At what point the USA would accept peace?

[AZrailwhale]

Ok. Does it mean, that you choose the option "- The USA shouldn't accept Russia-prefered mutually acceptable peace treaty even after the first Russian counter-force strike"?

That means that around ninety five percent of the Russian missiles will either blow up on launch, fail to clear their silos or will land on Russian territory when their sustainer engines fail. The US will retaliate on launch and Russia will cease to exist. The UK will do the same because flight times are less to there and who knows what France will do, probably just annex what little Russian territory isn’t an irradiated wasteland.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You didn't know it only because you don't want to know. But yes. Ukraine is a part of Russia (in the wider meaning of the word, as Canada is a part of America), and there are American troops who fired US missiles (ATACMS are american missiles) on the territory of the Russian federation.
Anyway. If a ship with joint Russian-Yemeni crew, launch some Russian made Club-M cruise missiles [even conventional] at one of US bases in Alaska - will you consider it as a "direct" conflict?

When the explosions are examined and the fissile material is identified, the US will launch on Russia. Would you trade a bunch military bases or cities for an American one? I know you are ignorant and dumb, but fissile material has a signature and can be traced to the mine it came from. No American president could survive not massively retaliating for a nuclear attack on American soil. You don’t understand Americans and underestimate us. We took down two governments and conquered both Iraq and Afghanistan because terrorists associated with their governments killed three thousand Americans, the reaction to a nuclear attack would be devastating to Russia.

 

[Mushroom]

but fissile material has a signature and can be traced to the mine it came from.

Not only that, also the plant that the material was processed at, and which process was used to refine it.

Sometimes even able to identify the exact batch and when it was made.

 

[Zavulon]

That means that around ninety five percent of the Russian missiles will either blow up on launch, fail to clear their silos or will land on Russian territory when their sustainer engines fail. The US will retaliate on launch and Russia will cease to exist. The UK will do the same because flight times are less to there and who knows what France will do, probably just annex what little Russian territory isn’t an irradiated wasteland.

If you are that sure and really want to gamble with the very survival of the American nation - pick the option "four", plz.

 

[Zavulon]

When the explosions are examined and the fissile material is identified, the US will launch on Russia. Would you trade a bunch military bases or cities for an American one? I know you are ignorant and dumb, but fissile material has a signature and can be traced to the mine it came from. No American president could survive not massively retaliating for a nuclear attack on American soil. You don’t understand Americans and underestimate us. We took down two governments and conquered both Iraq and Afghanistan because terrorists associated with their governments killed three thousand Americans, the reaction to a nuclear attack would be devastating to Russia.

Ok. The Russians won't even denie, that it those missiles were made in Russia. They will laugh in your face and say, that those Russian-made missiles were given to Yemenis exactly to help them to fight American aggresion, and it was Yeminis hand that turned the key (while the list of targets and all other preparations were made and authorised by Russians).

After that - will you attack Russian cities immediately, without even attempt to protect your civilians or attack Russian nuclear forces to decrease their retaliation?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Ok. The Russians won't even denie, that it those missiles were made in Russia. They will laugh in your face and say, that those Russian-made missiles were given to Yemenis exactly to help them to fight American aggresion, and it was Yeminis hand that turned the key (while the list of targets and all other preparations were made and authorised by Russians).

After that - will you attack Russian cities immediately, without even attempt to protect your civilians or attack Russian nuclear forces to decrease their retaliation?

Gee, isn't that the argument that you are making that allows Russia to directly attack NATO and the USA? Grow up.

 

[Zavulon]

Gee, isn't that the argument that you are making that allows Russia to directly attack NATO and the USA? Grow up.

Exactly. If Russia directly attack mainlands of the USA with Russia-made, Russia-financed, Russia-organized, Russia-guided and Russia-authorized weapons and forces - the existence of a specially hired Yemeni in the chain of command won't make a difference. You do realise that it is pretty stupid and poor excuse. You would rightfully consider it as a direct attack of the Russian Federation on the United States of America. The same way the existence of a specially hired Ukrainian in the whole system of the US C3I is really poor excuse. Actually, its no excuse at all. It was a direct attack of the United States of America against Russian Federation.
And in those circumstances Russia simply have very few options:

• retaliate equally (to demonstrate USA that their actions are unacceptable);
• retaliate escalatory (to push them back)
• kill the beast (to cease US existence and close the American question once and forever).