No problem.
These people have to know they are misleading you. I guess it generates ad revenue so they don't care. The defense had already stipulated these contentions pretrial. Then at the last minute they tried to back track.
www.documentcloud.org
These people have to know they are misleading you. I guess it generates ad revenue so they don't care. The defense had already stipulated these contentions pretrial. Then at the last minute they tried to back track.
DocumentCloud
This is why the supporting crimes don't need to be litigated.
"And because the object-crime enhancement punishes a criminal intent, not a criminal act, see Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d at 27, and the object crime need not be proven at trial or even completed, see id., it makes sense for New York to deter falsification of business records to conceal or commit any crimes, regardless of whether New York specifically punishes the object crime at issue."
This is why the supporting crimes can be federal..
Case law also supports interpreting Penal Law § 175.10 to include federal crimes as well as state crimes. In interpreting the meaning of the word "crime" in other sections of the Penal Law, appellate courts have agreed that the term can fairly encompass offenses in a foreign jurisdiction.
These people have to know they are misleading you. I guess it generates ad revenue so they don't care. The defense had already stipulated these contentions pretrial. Then at the last minute they tried to back track.
DocumentCloud
This is why the supporting crimes don't need to be litigated.
"And because the object-crime enhancement punishes a criminal intent, not a criminal act, see Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d at 27, and the object crime need not be proven at trial or even completed, see id., it makes sense for New York to deter falsification of business records to conceal or commit any crimes, regardless of whether New York specifically punishes the object crime at issue."
This is why the supporting crimes can be federal..
Case law also supports interpreting Penal Law § 175.10 to include federal crimes as well as state crimes. In interpreting the meaning of the word "crime" in other sections of the Penal Law, appellate courts have agreed that the term can fairly encompass offenses in a foreign jurisdiction.
Made up legal bullshit?
certilmanbalin.com
It's not required.
Defendants have the right to know the crimes they are being accused of, Dumbass.
Your post doesn't change a Constitutional right, Simp.
Lol, regale me with your insight into the constitution.
It’s now up to the jury to figure out the unidentified crime with some half assed lib loon judge notion that after a Guilty verdict is declared then the crime where guilt was found will be identified
Made up legal bullshit?
It is based on precedent.
Did you even look at the people vs taveras that was referenced by the judge last year during pretrial? Bove was aware of this of course.
People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
We also reject defendant's contention that a separate crime automatically becomes a material element of falsifying business records in the first degree whenever the People rely on the "intent to conceal" prong of that statute on the theory that concealment, as opposed to an intent to commit another crime or aid in the commission thereof, presupposes a prior completed crime. Read as a whole, it is clear that falsifying business records in the second degree is elevated to a first-degree offense on the basis of an enhanced intent requirement — "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof" — not any additional actus reus element
Essentially you are taking the opinion of a couple people and claiming that over rides precedent...a laughable position.
Here is an example of the guy you believe being wrong...yet again...
To achieve that extraordinary goal, he has alleged that the document violations (which expired long ago under the statute of limitations) were committed to hide some other crime. (Turley)
yet..
It's Official: The Statute of Limitations Was Tolled, Not Suspended, During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Certilman Balin
It's Official: The Statute of Limitations Was Tolled, Not Suspended, During the COVID-19 Pandemic
a result, any statute of limitations that began to run and did not expire prior to March 20, 2020 will have 228 days added on to it. Any statute of limitations that began to run during that tolling period will have the amount of days between the date of accrual and November 3, 2020 added on to it. So, for example, the six-year statute of limitations for a breach of contract action that accrued on March 19, 2020, will now not expire until after November 2, 2026.
Turley can't even get the statute of limitations right. Lol.
Ultimately it appears you will believe what you want to believe and what you want to believe is Trump's a victim.
Fake news
Trump trial’s biggest issue is whether jurors embrace the Lawrence O’Donnell strategy
The Trump trial is coming down to its closing arguments. But the big question might not be about guilt, it might be whether jurors embrace a strategy similar to a far-left TV host.www.foxnews.com
Well, for the layperson, it can be confusing trying to figure out what Trump did wrong.. Oh, that's right, it's hard to figure out because he didn't do anything wrong... But boy, can these fake prosecutors make it look like he did..
sigh
from the site
Merchan has allowed the government to bring back into life a dead misdemeanor and convert it into 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. To accomplish this legal regeneration, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has vaguely referenced a variety of crimes that Trump allegedly was trying to conceal through the business record violations....
Bragg is expected to finally state with clarity what he is alleging ... at the closing arguments of the case.
comments
Wow, we find out what the crimes is AFTER closing arguments!
THUGS
If Trump can get convicted of this, which BTW: the federal govt "passed" on prosecuting
We are all in big trouble. It essentially means that NO courtroom in the US can be trusted.. once they find out what party you belong to.
Fake Justice.
Quit yer whining snowflake.
Quit your support for Soviet LAWFARE in the United States.
