Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The map above is striking. It is a perfect illustration that politics and facts at times seem mutually exclusive. In short, with just a few exceptions, the states whose politicians preach small government are much more dependent on it than other states.
States in green or closer to green on the map above are less dependent on the federal government. States in red or closer to red on the map above are more dependent on the federal government.
The extent to which the average American’s tax burden would vary based on his state of residence represents a significant point of differentiation between state economies. But it’s only once piece of the puzzle.
What if, for example, a particular state can afford not to tax its residents at high rates because it’s receiving disproportionately more funding from the federal government than states with apparently oppressive tax codes? That would change the narrative significantly, revealing federal dependence where bold, efficient stewardship was once thought to preside.
Do they really want a small federal government? It would kill their states’ economies.
Many of the southern states that have no state income tax or have low taxes do so on the backs of the states that pay much more in federal taxes. Governors like Texas Rick Perry make the rounds attempting to bring business to their states. They do it under the pretext of these states having better business environments because of low taxes and regulations. They should note they can have low taxes because they are subsidized by the federal government and the poor.
Do you get these out of a playbook or on the playground?
Do you get these out of a playbook or on the playground?
Can't argue the facts, can you.
Do you get these out of a playbook or on the playground?
Can't argue the facts, can you.
Would you listen? I mean, are you allowed to?
Can't argue the facts, can you.
Would you listen? I mean, are you allowed to?
Sure.
Stop the childish insults and talk like an adult.
And address the facts of the OP.
Can't argue the facts, can you.
Would you listen? I mean, are you allowed to?
Sure.
Stop the childish insults and talk like an adult.
And address the facts of the OP.
Do they really want a small federal government? It would kill their states’ economies.
Would you listen? I mean, are you allowed to?
Sure.
Stop the childish insults and talk like an adult.
And address the facts of the OP.
what factz?
lets look at Tennessee where most of the govt assistance goes...I bet it was to my county of Shelby....what do you think?
Its a fallacy to begin with.Do you get these out of a playbook or on the playground?
Can't argue the facts, can you.
Hell, take out the 20 year Senator and the 30 year congress critter and see how it balances out.Blah blah blah. This is old news. Take out the military bases and show the chart again.
Dependent on the FED? Really? Is that why Red States under largely 'Rightwing' control are beating the pants off of Blue ones with budget surpluses? Seems to me that they aren't at ALL dependent on the FED for shit. And tell us WHY people are leaving in droves from blue State shitholes?States Preaching Small Government Most Dependent On Federal Government
No wonder they don't really want to secede ( or, for some maroons, succeed).The map above is striking. It is a perfect illustration that politics and facts at times seem mutually exclusive. In short, with just a few exceptions, the states whose politicians preach small government are much more dependent on it than other states.
States in green or closer to green on the map above are less dependent on the federal government. States in red or closer to red on the map above are more dependent on the federal government.
The extent to which the average Americans tax burden would vary based on his state of residence represents a significant point of differentiation between state economies. But its only once piece of the puzzle.
What if, for example, a particular state can afford not to tax its residents at high rates because its receiving disproportionately more funding from the federal government than states with apparently oppressive tax codes? That would change the narrative significantly, revealing federal dependence where bold, efficient stewardship was once thought to preside.
Do they really want a small federal government? It would kill their states economies.
Many of the southern states that have no state income tax or have low taxes do so on the backs of the states that pay much more in federal taxes. Governors like Texas Rick Perry make the rounds attempting to bring business to their states. They do it under the pretext of these states having better business environments because of low taxes and regulations. They should note they can have low taxes because they are subsidized by the federal government and the poor.
Dependent on the FED? Really? Is that why Red States under largely 'Rightwing' control are beating the pants off of Blue ones with budget surpluses? Seems to me that they aren't at ALL dependent on the FED for shit. And tell us WHY people are leaving in droves from blue State shitholes?States Preaching Small Government Most Dependent On Federal Government
No wonder they don't really want to secede ( or, for some maroons, succeed).The map above is striking. It is a perfect illustration that politics and facts at times seem mutually exclusive. In short, with just a few exceptions, the states whose politicians preach small government are much more dependent on it than other states.
States in green or closer to green on the map above are less dependent on the federal government. States in red or closer to red on the map above are more dependent on the federal government.
The extent to which the average Americans tax burden would vary based on his state of residence represents a significant point of differentiation between state economies. But its only once piece of the puzzle.
What if, for example, a particular state can afford not to tax its residents at high rates because its receiving disproportionately more funding from the federal government than states with apparently oppressive tax codes? That would change the narrative significantly, revealing federal dependence where bold, efficient stewardship was once thought to preside.
Do they really want a small federal government? It would kill their states economies.
Many of the southern states that have no state income tax or have low taxes do so on the backs of the states that pay much more in federal taxes. Governors like Texas Rick Perry make the rounds attempting to bring business to their states. They do it under the pretext of these states having better business environments because of low taxes and regulations. They should note they can have low taxes because they are subsidized by the federal government and the poor.
You know places with less taxation, business friendly? You idiots are desperate, and are going to lose your asses come November. Count on it.
