It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
lawyers giving opinions are war criminals?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It is so. They were actively involved in the commission of a war crime. That makes them war criminals.
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It is so. They were actively involved in the commission of a war crime. That makes them war criminals.
x1Hey fly catcher! Speaking of shit, you are exactly like a pile of freshly made dog shit. You DO attract flies.
Anyway, wading through that gibberish you just posted, it appears that you have added your mere opinion to my expressed opinion of some leftist political opinion.
But you objected to offering opinions.
You are a special kind of shit. In this latest example, you have again established that you are a complete dipshit!![]()
And you're a punk and a coward. Bet if we met 1x1 you'd piss your pants. I suspect you've got some experience doing that too.
did you seriously bust out some internet tough guy rant in attempt to mute his point? wow....
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It is so. They were actively involved in the commission of a war crime. That makes them war criminals.
I would love to see you make this argument with their actions mapped to the definition of war crimes
Logic 101.
If all A are a subset of B and all B are a subset of C, then A is a subset of C.
Waterboarding is torture.
Torture is a war crime.
Therefore, waterboarding is a war crime.
Logic 101.
If all A are a subset of B and all B are a subset of C, then A is a subset of C.
Waterboarding is torture.
Torture is a war crime.
Therefore, waterboarding is a war crime.
Waterboarding was not a war crime dumb ass. In fact it was still legal for awhile under Obama as well. You see retard, in this Country, one can not go retroactively back and make a claim of a crime. Since it was NOT illegal until Obama and Holder made it illegal you have no case. TRY again.
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It is so. They were actively involved in the commission of a war crime. That makes them war criminals.
Logic 101.
If all A are a subset of B and all B are a subset of C, then A is a subset of C.
Waterboarding is torture.
Torture is a war crime.
Therefore, waterboarding is a war crime.
Waterboarding was not a war crime dumb ass. In fact it was still legal for awhile under Obama as well. You see retard, in this Country, one can not go retroactively back and make a claim of a crime. Since it was NOT illegal until Obama and Holder made it illegal you have no case. TRY again.
It won't be an ex post facto law because torture has already been defined as a crime by our laws for decades.
The witch-hunt appears to be over -- at least on this front.
Newsweak reports:
Report: Bush Lawyer Said President Could Order Civilians to Be 'Massacred' - Declassified Blog - Newsweek.com
About damn time. The fuckers may disagree with what the "memos" contended and, in disagreeing, they may even be in the right. (I certainly take issue with this part: "The chief author of the Bush administration's "torture memo" told Justice Department investigators that the president's war-making authority was so broad that he had the constitutional power to order a village to be "massacred * * * "). But to argue that they deserve to even arguably be professionally disciplined over what amounts to a LEGAL OPINION [and a sharp disagreement as to that opinion] is to undermine the foundation of professional advocacy and the rendering OF legal opinions. The "investigation" into whether the lawyers should be "disciplined" was, from jump street, totally political in the worst form of unduly partisan bullshit, and utterly absurd.
This should warm the heart of a statist like you...your beloved government has the authority to commit genocide.
If only you had a heart...
Another in your endless, stupid, pointless lies.
I wonder if you could ever make an argument without reliance on lies? It appears unlikely.
First of all, as you already know, I am not a Statist. I stand opposed to Statists and Statism. This is why I oppose the bullshit you spew. Indeed, the truth is that YOU are the Statist. Yep. Tis true. Too bad you don't seem to understand the meaning of the term or how it applies to you. You appear not to even grasp the import of your own miserably ignorant political philosophy.
Secondly, that part of the Yoo memo, as paraphrased in the quote I offered in the OP, is the very thing I contested in the OP. there may be a kernel of truth to it despite the fact that it is repugnant, but I disputed it before and I dispute it now.
Thirdly, you remain pointless.
If you only had a brain. And integrity. You could use a hefty dose of that, too.
yeah...because they pretended it wasn't torture...not because it isn't.And waterboarding was NOT defined as torture dumb ass. In fact we do it to our own troops in training exercises.
Waterboarding was not a war crime dumb ass. In fact it was still legal for awhile under Obama as well. You see retard, in this Country, one can not go retroactively back and make a claim of a crime. Since it was NOT illegal until Obama and Holder made it illegal you have no case. TRY again.
It won't be an ex post facto law because torture has already been defined as a crime by our laws for decades.
And waterboarding was NOT defined as torture dumb ass. In fact we do it to our own troops in training exercises.
yeah...because they pretended it wasn't torture...not because it isn't.And waterboarding was NOT defined as torture dumb ass. In fact we do it to our own troops in training exercises.
if i call my rabbit a duck, he still isn't a duck.
Not as sad as the fact that you and some of your ilk blithely bandy about the term "war criminal" as though because you maintain it, it's so.
It is so. They were actively involved in the commission of a war crime. That makes them war criminals.
No. They were idealogues and weren't acting as lawyers should. But they weren't war criminals. And suggesting they were diminishes any point you would otherwise have made.
So no.... it isn't so.
It won't be an ex post facto law because torture has already been defined as a crime by our laws for decades.
And waterboarding was NOT defined as torture dumb ass. In fact we do it to our own troops in training exercises.
We do it to our own troops as part of torture resistance training, which makes my point.
And since you want to get into military usage, the Army Field Manuel defines it as torture. We've also put enemy POWs on trial for war crimes for using waterboarding on American soldiers. The State Department's list of states which engage in torture includes several states which are listed as torturers for their use of waterboarding (and before you claim it's something Hillary did, those listings were made during the Bush administration).
It's a pretty sad day when you're got people cheering that war criminals will get away with their crimes.
lawyers giving opinions are war criminals?![]()