Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Because there aren't many true communist countries left.
China is a capitalist country these days, buddy. It's a very corrupt, pro-business, free enterprise country with a totalitarian government. Not unlike the U.S.
.
Former WVU Tech chief talks Cap and Trade, "Bayless said a recent analysis showed that every one of 928 recent scientific studies documented global warming, while 53 percent of articles in the "popular press" questioned its existence."
Charles Bayless: Climate Change Denial Is Like 'Denying You've Got Cancer And Hoping It Will Get Better'
06/28/2013
As former CEO of two major power companies in West Virginia, Charles Bayless may not seem like the poster boy for climate change advocacy. Yet in the wake of Obama’s unprecedented Georgetown speech, Bayless is using his position as a major player in a coal-producing state to speak in favor of the president’s agenda.
"If you're a West Virginian and a coal company and you're denying climate change, it's sort of like denying you've got cancer and hoping it will get better,” the Public News Service quoted Bayless as saying. “It won't. And the longer you deny it, the worse the fall will be.”
.
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Because there aren't many true communist countries left.
China is a capitalist country these days, buddy. It's a very corrupt, pro-business, free enterprise country with a totalitarian government. Not unlike the U.S.
Another fruitcake throwing around that fake 97% number like it's gospel!More and more the AGW Cult shows how totally batshit fucking Heaven's Gate Jim Jones Kool Aid insane they are
Who an I supposed to believe: 97% of scientists who actually study this topic, or some guy on an internet forum who calls himself Crusader Frank and thinks science is the equivalent of a suicide cult?
More and more the AGW Cult shows how totally batshit fucking Heaven's Gate Jim Jones Kool Aid insane they are
Who an I supposed to believe: 97% of scientists who actually study this topic, or some guy on an internet forum who calls himself Crusader Frank and thinks science is the equivalent of a suicide cult?
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Because there aren't many true communist countries left.
China is a capitalist country these days, buddy. It's a very corrupt, pro-business, free enterprise country with a totalitarian government. Not unlike the U.S.
And there it is, the obligatory "true communist" remark given by every lefty when shown the shortcomings of the manifesto...
Yes, yes we know, communism is perfect it's just nobody actually does true communism.. Sure, and the fact that it won't work might have something to do with that?? Maybe??
Here's the problem you lefties aren't getting. Communism won't work because people are just a few hundred years away from drawing on cave walls. We still covet, we still suffer from jealousy, we still want things we don't need, and we still have crimes of passion. When those things are no longer a factor, when we evolve to the point we aren't driven towards those things maybe, MAYBE then it might work. But even then it would require a unified global change by everyone, and that's not likely any time soon. As long as one country or group doesn't go along with it, we will have that country taking an unfair advantage and soon the other countries will want that as well.
You people need to grow up and stop living in your idealistic fantasy world.
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
.
Former WVU Tech chief talks Cap and Trade, "Bayless said a recent analysis showed that every one of 928 recent scientific studies documented global warming, while 53 percent of articles in the "popular press" questioned its existence."
Charles Bayless: Climate Change Denial Is Like 'Denying You've Got Cancer And Hoping It Will Get Better'
06/28/2013
As former CEO of two major power companies in West Virginia, Charles Bayless may not seem like the poster boy for climate change advocacy. Yet in the wake of Obama’s unprecedented Georgetown speech, Bayless is using his position as a major player in a coal-producing state to speak in favor of the president’s agenda.
"If you're a West Virginian and a coal company and you're denying climate change, it's sort of like denying you've got cancer and hoping it will get better,” the Public News Service quoted Bayless as saying. “It won't. And the longer you deny it, the worse the fall will be.”
.
It tells us that once again the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood is on the same side as America's enemies.No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Poor ed is so confused. He now forgets that Nancy Pelosi's nephew benefitted when Solyndra went belly up and investors went home with a pile of money thanks to her extracting it out of taxpayers ahead of time in legislation most people never even heard of. Edthe cannot acknowledge that Pelosi is a Democrat and all the people who got their grubby little greedy fingers on all that free money were Demmies. After all, some people believe everything the spinners say.It tells us that once again the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood is on the same side as America's enemies.No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Oh, goody -- more self-important leftists who started their research with their conclusion and worked backwards. Climate "science" is usually done that way.
No Communist country is buying into this Green BS.
What does that tell you?
Given all the action China is taking, it tells me that you don't get any info from outside of your cult bubble. Hence the reason you're a denialist.
China becoming global climate change leader, study says
It's essentially impossible for an intelligent, honest and well-informed person to be a denialist. At most, a denialist can have 2 out of those 3.
Oh, goody -- more self-important leftists who started their research with their conclusion and worked backwards. Climate "science" is usually done that way.
And by repeating that crazy conspiracy lie, one that doesn't have a shred of evidence to back it up, you thus confirm the study's conclusions.
Does the denialist exist here who doesn't claim all the data is faked? No. Every single one of 'em is a conspiracy embracer, declaring that all the data is faked, and that the reviewers who say the data is good are also part of the conspiracy. The entire planet, except for them, is apparently part of the conspiracy.
Totally non-disprovable, marking it as pseudoscience. They can't even come together with one coherent theory. Some them deny any warming, and the rest have ten different theories as to what's causing the warming, none of which make any sense. If denialists want the same credibility that mainstream science has, they have to put forth an actual theory, make predictions based on it, and see those predictions come to pass over and over for decades.
Oh, you mean like the planet has been getting warmer the past 17 years, despite there being no significant warming?Oh, goody -- more self-important leftists who started their research with their conclusion and worked backwards. Climate "science" is usually done that way.
And by repeating that crazy conspiracy lie, one that doesn't have a shred of evidence to back it up, you thus confirm the study's conclusions.
Does the denialist exist here who doesn't claim all the data is faked? No. Every single one of 'em is a conspiracy embracer, declaring that all the data is faked, and that the reviewers who say the data is good are also part of the conspiracy. The entire planet, except for them, is apparently part of the conspiracy.
Totally non-disprovable, marking it as pseudoscience. They can't even come together with one coherent theory. Some them deny any warming, and the rest have ten different theories as to what's causing the warming, none of which make any sense. If denialists want the same credibility that mainstream science has, they have to put forth an actual theory, make predictions based on it, and see those predictions come to pass over and over for decades.
Oh, goody -- more self-important leftists who started their research with their conclusion and worked backwards. Climate "science" is usually done that way.
And by repeating that crazy conspiracy lie, one that doesn't have a shred of evidence to back it up, you thus confirm the study's conclusions.
Does the denialist exist here who doesn't claim all the data is faked? No. Every single one of 'em is a conspiracy embracer, declaring that all the data is faked, and that the reviewers who say the data is good are also part of the conspiracy. The entire planet, except for them, is apparently part of the conspiracy.
Totally non-disprovable, marking it as pseudoscience. They can't even come together with one coherent theory. Some them deny any warming, and the rest have ten different theories as to what's causing the warming, none of which make any sense. If denialists want the same credibility that mainstream science has, they have to put forth an actual theory, make predictions based on it, and see those predictions come to pass over and over for decades.
I predict, whether the climate warms or cools, whether it gets wetter or drier, warmists will blame humans. I further predict that their solution will be ever larger government control over our lives.
The nice thing about my prediction, you can back-test it over the last 40 years and see that I'm right already.
I predict, whether the climate warms or cools, whether it gets wetter or drier, warmists will blame humans. I further predict that their solution will be ever larger government control over our lives.
I predict, whether the climate warms or cools, whether it gets wetter or drier, warmists will blame humans. I further predict that their solution will be ever larger government control over our lives.
Ah, a fine 'tard rant about the socialist menace.
You know, when the point is how denialists are all such brainwashed political cultists, they might consider not always immediately leaping to confirm that point.
Oh, goody -- more self-important leftists who started their research with their conclusion and worked backwards. Climate "science" is usually done that way.
And by repeating that crazy conspiracy lie, one that doesn't have a shred of evidence to back it up, you thus confirm the study's conclusions.
Does the denialist exist here who doesn't claim all the data is faked? No. Every single one of 'em is a conspiracy embracer, declaring that all the data is faked, and that the reviewers who say the data is good are also part of the conspiracy. The entire planet, except for them, is apparently part of the conspiracy.
Totally non-disprovable, marking it as pseudoscience. They can't even come together with one coherent theory. Some them deny any warming, and the rest have ten different theories as to what's causing the warming, none of which make any sense. If denialists want the same credibility that mainstream science has, they have to put forth an actual theory, make predictions based on it, and see those predictions come to pass over and over for decades.
