This thread was originally posted in the HILLARY CLINTON forum.
Compare Hillary’s skin in this picture to how she looks in one of her campaign ads:
http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/07/Hillary-TW5.jpg
Hillary’s commercials are technicolor productions to make her look attractive. To be fair, every politician uses the same tricks. In Hillary’s case tricks like cheesecloth over the camera’s lens to hide her wrinkles are absolutely necessary. Everything from her talking points to her glowing look to the way she carries herself in a campaign ad is designed to hide Hillary’s hangdog look in real life.
Incidentally, makeup sprayed on with a paint gun for live appearances was learned from the way Richard Nixon looked without makeup in the very first television debate. In short: Image beats message every time.
Sorry to say that Hillary will continue to benefit from the strength of criminal enterprises. By that I mean criminal gangs in cities and states are never eliminated. An occasional big shot goes to jail, but the same criminal activity that began a hundred years ago continues unabated to this day. Not once has the structure of crime ever been wiped out. So there is not a chance crime and people like the Clintons will disappear on the federal level.
Taking the income tax away from the federal government will only reduce the scope of corruption. A much smaller number of crooks in government is the best that Americas can expect.
Finally, Mafia Dons, drug lords, etc. thrive on voluntary customers, while government gangsters force their customers to contribute the same way stickup artists do it.
Private sector charities have always been rackets, but at least the suckers donated voluntarily. Once in a while a private sector charity hustler went to jail. Long before the Clinton Foundation came along tax dollar charities created a new body of criminal law. As far as I know, not one tax dollar charity-hustling crook was arrested. It is unlikely the Clintons will be the first.
There is one flaw in Arvay’s piece:
Compare Hillary’s skin in this picture to how she looks in one of her campaign ads:
Hillary’s commercials are technicolor productions to make her look attractive. To be fair, every politician uses the same tricks. In Hillary’s case tricks like cheesecloth over the camera’s lens to hide her wrinkles are absolutely necessary. Everything from her talking points to her glowing look to the way she carries herself in a campaign ad is designed to hide Hillary’s hangdog look in real life.
Incidentally, makeup sprayed on with a paint gun for live appearances was learned from the way Richard Nixon looked without makeup in the very first television debate. In short: Image beats message every time.
Sorry to say that Hillary will continue to benefit from the strength of criminal enterprises. By that I mean criminal gangs in cities and states are never eliminated. An occasional big shot goes to jail, but the same criminal activity that began a hundred years ago continues unabated to this day. Not once has the structure of crime ever been wiped out. So there is not a chance crime and people like the Clintons will disappear on the federal level.
Taking the income tax away from the federal government will only reduce the scope of corruption. A much smaller number of crooks in government is the best that Americas can expect.
Finally, Mafia Dons, drug lords, etc. thrive on voluntary customers, while government gangsters force their customers to contribute the same way stickup artists do it.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Private sector charities have always been rackets, but at least the suckers donated voluntarily. Once in a while a private sector charity hustler went to jail. Long before the Clinton Foundation came along tax dollar charities created a new body of criminal law. As far as I know, not one tax dollar charity-hustling crook was arrested. It is unlikely the Clintons will be the first.
With the much publicized recent health scare regarding Hillary Clinton, there are rumors of the Democrat National Committee seriously considering replacing her. Here is why they can't.
In a nutshell, it is the Clinton Family Foundation. With millions of dollars collected from donors, including foreign governments, it is hardly a secret that those donors expect their money's worth – not in charity, but in influence. A Clinton in the White House will be the one and only avenue of repayment to those donors.
If Hillary does not win the presidency, those donors are going to be very, shall we say, disappointed – or may we go so far as to say, very angry?
The Clintons anticipated that problem, which is why Hillary has already averred that she will place her husband in charge of the economy. A major part of a working plan would be for her to appoint her husband as secretary of state, which would place Bill Clinton in position to effectively exercise all the powers of the presidency using Hillary's authority. The foundation donors will be pleased with that arrangement, because they can then collect their pound of flesh from the American taxpayer.
In a nutshell, it is the Clinton Family Foundation. With millions of dollars collected from donors, including foreign governments, it is hardly a secret that those donors expect their money's worth – not in charity, but in influence. A Clinton in the White House will be the one and only avenue of repayment to those donors.
XXXXX
If Hillary does not win the presidency, those donors are going to be very, shall we say, disappointed – or may we go so far as to say, very angry?
XXXXX
The Clintons anticipated that problem, which is why Hillary has already averred that she will place her husband in charge of the economy. A major part of a working plan would be for her to appoint her husband as secretary of state, which would place Bill Clinton in position to effectively exercise all the powers of the presidency using Hillary's authority. The foundation donors will be pleased with that arrangement, because they can then collect their pound of flesh from the American taxpayer.
September 14, 2016
Why the Democrats cannot replace Hillary Clinton
By Robert Arvay
Blog: Why the Democrats cannot replace Hillary Clinton
Why the Democrats cannot replace Hillary Clinton
By Robert Arvay
Blog: Why the Democrats cannot replace Hillary Clinton
There is one flaw in Arvay’s piece:
Hillary even lies when she tells the truth:
Hillary Clinton Says 'No,' Bill Won't Serve in Her Cabinet
By Liz Kreutz
May 16, 2016, 1:10 PM ET
Hillary Clinton Says Bill Won't Serve in Her Cabinet
By Liz Kreutz
May 16, 2016, 1:10 PM ET
Hillary Clinton Says Bill Won't Serve in Her Cabinet
She could have simply said it is “. . . illegal for the members of families of the president to be in the Cabinet.”.
The question should be “Will you make him United Nations Secretary General?”
The question should be “Will you make him United Nations Secretary General?”
