It's called weather, chicken little.Why so much nasty weather?
Forecasters attributed the violent weather to warm temperatures, an unstable atmosphere, strong wind shear and abundant moisture streaming from the Gulf.
Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky, Arkansas, Mississippi,
At Least 16 Dead In Flooding And Tornadoes As Storms Slash From Texas To Ohio
Day after day of heavy rains have pounded the central U.S., rapidly swelling waterways and prompting a series of flash flood emergencies in from Texas to Ohio.www.huffpost.com
It's as if God is punishing red states for their stupidity.
Climate Change is all bunk?
- Thread starter Delldude
- Start date
You didn't go to meteorologist school they did. You sound like RFK Jr.
God seems to punish red states for blue state faggitry.
Skull
Platinum Member
ReinyDays
Gold Member
I went to meteorology school ... and ding is spot-on correct ... one storm has very little effect on the 100-year climate average ...
The Rocky Mountains force the cold dry Westerlies up and over ... this leave underneath room for soaking wet hot Gulf of Cuba air to flow in low ... then buoyancy happens ... ka-boom ...
The laugher here is "generational" storms are normal, average, expected ... each of us gets four of them every hundred years ... on average ... your insurance policy should be covering these losses ...
You don't need to go to meteorology school to know the difference between weather and climate, dumdum.
You sound like Jane Fonda.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,285
- 27,205
- 2,905
AI debunked the CC hysteria? This is very interesting, using AI to analyze 'scientific' data. There has been an extraordinary amount of unpermitted conjecture relative to 'peer reviewed findings' and it appears AI has come to specific conclusions based on available data.
The Climate Scam is Over..
Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims
On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate Change journal published a ground-breaking study using AI (Grok-3) to debunk the man-made climate crisis narrative. Click on the link below for the paper titled: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis:
Link
This peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man's role in the climate change narrative it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.
Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using AI to critically review scientific data will soon become the standard in both the physical and medical sciences.
______________________
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims. During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance.
______________________
The sun takes center stage instead. Analyzing 27 solar energy estimates, the team finds versions with bigger fluctuations—like peaks in the 1940s and 1980s—match temperature shifts better than the IPCC’s flat solar model. Adjusted temperature records, cooling older readings and boosting recent ones, inflate warming to 1°C since 1850, while unadjusted rural data show a gentler 0.5°C rise. “
This upends the climate story,” says Jonathan Cohler. “Nature, not humanity, may hold the wheel.” Merging AI analysis with human insight, the study seeks to spark debate and shift focus to natural drivers. It’s available at Science of Climate Change.
_____________________
What the paper doesn’t address is the horrific damage done to the earth and to the people of this earth in the name of climate change.
In 2021, during the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, the U.S. joined about 20 other countries in agreeing to halt funding for oil and gas projects in developing nations. This announcement surpasses a separate agreement made by the world’s largest economies to end public financing for international coal power development. Also in 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance for multilateral development banks “aimed at squeezing off fossil fuel financing except in certain circumstances.”
Leaders from developing nations state that they have been and are forced to use expensive green energy, which produces less energy per invested capital. This has made it even harder for billions of people to escape poverty. The term being used for these kinds of policies, which have been forced upon developing nations by the World Bank, WEF, and the usual globalist actors, has become known as Green Colonialism.
Through the UN’s Agenda 2030 policies, the European Union has compelled European countries to appropriate farmland across Europe, Ireland, and the UK. Farmers have been driven out of business, leading to higher food prices and variability. Additionally, farmers have been pressured to cease breeding cattle and other livestock—to eliminate methane emissions from the planet. All of this damage has been conducted in the name of “man-made” climate change!
Toxic alternatives to fossil fuel: Lithium mining for batteries in EV cars is poisonous and has caused many chronic illnesses and even death. Children are often used to mine lithium. The waste from these batteries is not easily disposed of. Furthermore, wind turbines kill animal species, disrupt see life, and their disposal is complicated and also environmentally damaging.
The Climate Scam is Over..
Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claimswww.malone.news
Bwahhhhhhhhhahhhhhhhahhhhhhhh...
Oh.... This is just too good.
Snake has swallowed its own tail!
Just can't get better entertainment value than this.
- Thread starter
- #28
It gets even better:
Trump eyes huge climate research cuts at NOAA
ICYMI: Administrator Zeldin in WSJ: “EPA Ends the ‘Green New Deal’” | US EPA
EPA News Release: ICYMI: Administrator Zeldin in WSJ: “EPA Ends the ‘Green New Deal’”
www.epa.gov
ReinyDays
Gold Member
It gets even better:
Trump eyes huge climate research cuts at NOAA
ICYMI: Administrator Zeldin in WSJ: “EPA Ends the ‘Green New Deal’” | US EPA
EPA News Release: ICYMI: Administrator Zeldin in WSJ: “EPA Ends the ‘Green New Deal’”
NOAA will still collect data for climate research ... as part of her weather forecasting mandate ... we don't get reliable forecasts past 72 hours ... we should probably fix that before we worry about predictions 100 years hence ... NOAA is still the place to go for the raw data we average together for our climatic values ...
Climatology is a good dumping ground for folks who can't learn math ... and schools can still collect tuition at the tax-payers expense ... makes me feel sorry for tax-payers ... [giggle] ...
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,285
- 27,205
- 2,905
Forecast: Financial storms ahead for DEI climatologists! High winds of stress interspersed with mortgage delinquencies, increased alcohol consumption, marital disengagement and credit card failure! Suggest immediate sheltering in place at institutions of real science and narrative deprogramming centers. Green tea can sometimes take the edge off of suicidal ideation!
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,449
- 13,057
- 2,400
ReinyDays
Gold Member
What do you have against baboons? ...
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
LOL Grok is hardly credible.AI debunked the CC hysteria? This is very interesting, using AI to analyze 'scientific' data. There has been an extraordinary amount of unpermitted conjecture relative to 'peer reviewed findings' and it appears AI has come to specific conclusions based on available data.
The Climate Scam is Over..
Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims
On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate Change journal published a ground-breaking study using AI (Grok-3) to debunk the man-made climate crisis narrative. Click on the link below for the paper titled: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis:
Link
This peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man's role in the climate change narrative it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.
Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using AI to critically review scientific data will soon become the standard in both the physical and medical sciences.
______________________
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims. During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance.
______________________
The sun takes center stage instead. Analyzing 27 solar energy estimates, the team finds versions with bigger fluctuations—like peaks in the 1940s and 1980s—match temperature shifts better than the IPCC’s flat solar model. Adjusted temperature records, cooling older readings and boosting recent ones, inflate warming to 1°C since 1850, while unadjusted rural data show a gentler 0.5°C rise. “
This upends the climate story,” says Jonathan Cohler. “Nature, not humanity, may hold the wheel.” Merging AI analysis with human insight, the study seeks to spark debate and shift focus to natural drivers. It’s available at Science of Climate Change.
_____________________
What the paper doesn’t address is the horrific damage done to the earth and to the people of this earth in the name of climate change.
In 2021, during the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, the U.S. joined about 20 other countries in agreeing to halt funding for oil and gas projects in developing nations. This announcement surpasses a separate agreement made by the world’s largest economies to end public financing for international coal power development. Also in 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance for multilateral development banks “aimed at squeezing off fossil fuel financing except in certain circumstances.”
Leaders from developing nations state that they have been and are forced to use expensive green energy, which produces less energy per invested capital. This has made it even harder for billions of people to escape poverty. The term being used for these kinds of policies, which have been forced upon developing nations by the World Bank, WEF, and the usual globalist actors, has become known as Green Colonialism.
Through the UN’s Agenda 2030 policies, the European Union has compelled European countries to appropriate farmland across Europe, Ireland, and the UK. Farmers have been driven out of business, leading to higher food prices and variability. Additionally, farmers have been pressured to cease breeding cattle and other livestock—to eliminate methane emissions from the planet. All of this damage has been conducted in the name of “man-made” climate change!
Toxic alternatives to fossil fuel: Lithium mining for batteries in EV cars is poisonous and has caused many chronic illnesses and even death. Children are often used to mine lithium. The waste from these batteries is not easily disposed of. Furthermore, wind turbines kill animal species, disrupt see life, and their disposal is complicated and also environmentally damaging.
The Climate Scam is Over..
Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims
Shareprofit
Platinum Member
- Aug 25, 2021
- 1,409
- 726
- 928
You're an American so we would expect nothing less.
That is a textbook example of the dunning effect. Personally, I prefer to be underestimated. It works to my advantage. They never see it coming.You're an American so we would expect nothing less.
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 7,205
- 7,422
- 1,940
Don't think that Democrats care about facts and science. They believe otherwise and that's final as far as they are concerned. I have parried with them for decades online, and in person. They have only gotten worse. Now they pretend high school boys need tampons, and despise Trump finding corruption and waste in federal government.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,285
- 27,205
- 2,905
Personally I think we should hunt the polar bears to Extinction
They contribute nothing of note to the environment except predation on seals and beluga whales. They're extremely poor hunters and are only successful about one in every eight tries.
They don't prey on enough to make a difference in the life cycle and they are extremely dangerous animals to encounter.
Not only are they not cute they will kill you in 10 seconds without hesitation. The planet would be better off without them.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,285
- 27,205
- 2,905
The climate topic is a perfect one for the left because it encourages mass cooperation and therefore mass control.
Having said that It's good that Nixon establish the EPA when he did It wasn't awful lot of abuse prior to that. I can remember growing up near the French River in Massachusetts and see it run a different color everyday. Unless you put limits on people they will enact no limits on their own. Climate change in general however is a demonstrable hoax and continues to be supplemented with junk science.
The renewable energy goal is a worthy one but wind and solar are total bullshit. Not only do they not use less energy and resources they're more expensive and more damaging to the environment than the prior system is.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
US shifts military resources in Mideast in response to Israel strikes and possible Iran attack- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
-
Government says it won't release Mahmoud Khalil despite judge's order
- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 3
