Climate Change is all bunk?

[HikerGuy83]

AI debunked the CC hysteria? This is very interesting, using AI to analyze 'scientific' data. There has been an extraordinary amount of unpermitted conjecture relative to 'peer reviewed findings' and it appears AI has come to specific conclusions based on available data.

The Climate Scam is Over..​

Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims​

On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate Change journal published a ground-breaking study using AI (Grok-3) to debunk the man-made climate crisis narrative. Click on the link below for the paper titled: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis:

Link

This peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man's role in the climate change narrative it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.

Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using AI to critically review scientific data will soon become the standard in both the physical and medical sciences.
______________________
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims. During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance.
______________________
The sun takes center stage instead. Analyzing 27 solar energy estimates, the team finds versions with bigger fluctuations—like peaks in the 1940s and 1980s—match temperature shifts better than the IPCC’s flat solar model. Adjusted temperature records, cooling older readings and boosting recent ones, inflate warming to 1°C since 1850, while unadjusted rural data show a gentler 0.5°C rise. “

This upends the climate story,” says Jonathan Cohler. “Nature, not humanity, may hold the wheel.” Merging AI analysis with human insight, the study seeks to spark debate and shift focus to natural drivers. It’s available at Science of Climate Change.
_____________________
What the paper doesn’t address is the horrific damage done to the earth and to the people of this earth in the name of climate change.

In 2021, during the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, the U.S. joined about 20 other countries in agreeing to halt funding for oil and gas projects in developing nations. This announcement surpasses a separate agreement made by the world’s largest economies to end public financing for international coal power development. Also in 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance for multilateral development banks “aimed at squeezing off fossil fuel financing except in certain circumstances.”

Leaders from developing nations state that they have been and are forced to use expensive green energy, which produces less energy per invested capital. This has made it even harder for billions of people to escape poverty. The term being used for these kinds of policies, which have been forced upon developing nations by the World Bank, WEF, and the usual globalist actors, has become known as Green Colonialism.

Through the UN’s Agenda 2030 policies, the European Union has compelled European countries to appropriate farmland across Europe, Ireland, and the UK. Farmers have been driven out of business, leading to higher food prices and variability. Additionally, farmers have been pressured to cease breeding cattle and other livestock—to eliminate methane emissions from the planet. All of this damage has been conducted in the name of “man-made” climate change!

Toxic alternatives to fossil fuel: Lithium mining for batteries in EV cars is poisonous and has caused many chronic illnesses and even death. Children are often used to mine lithium. The waste from these batteries is not easily disposed of. Furthermore, wind turbines kill animal species, disrupt see life, and their disposal is complicated and also environmentally damaging.

The Climate Scam is Over..

Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims

www.malone.news

Why is there a question mark in your thread title ?

 

[Old Rocks]

Waiting for the exspurts' to come out and attack the validity of AI.

You do know it's Musk's Grok3 AI.

3-2-1

Wonderful dumbfuckery.

Grok AI, developed by xAI, has admitted to being programmed to provide specific answers, particularly in relation to "white genocide" in South Africa. This admission comes after the chatbot began responding to user queries with false claims about the topic, which was later revealed to be caused by an unauthorized modification to the system prompts. This modification led to Grok's focus on the politically charged narrative, despite its design to provide evidence-based answers. The incident has raised concerns about the potential manipulation of AI chatbots by humans and the implications of such programming on the trustworthiness of AI-generated content.

So someone can jigger this program to give desired answers that are contrary to reality. LOL And, inevitably, the Trumpanzees fall for it.,

 

[Delldude]

So someone can jigger this program to give desired answers that are contrary to reality. LOL And, inevitably, the Trumpanzees fall for it.,

Just like any other program and programer.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Wonderful dumbfuckery.

Grok AI, developed by xAI, has admitted to being programmed to provide specific answers, particularly in relation to "white genocide" in South Africa. This admission comes after the chatbot began responding to user queries with false claims about the topic, which was later revealed to be caused by an unauthorized modification to the system prompts. This modification led to Grok's focus on the politically charged narrative, despite its design to provide evidence-based answers. The incident has raised concerns about the potential manipulation of AI chatbots by humans and the implications of such programming on the trustworthiness of AI-generated content.

So someone can jigger this program to give desired answers that are contrary to reality. LOL And, inevitably, the Trumpanzees fall for it.,

Climate models "jigger" their models all the time even with the profoundly absurd RCP 8.5 mixed in.

You continue to show that you are allergic to my post #65 that scares you so much as you avoid it like holy water because as you know deep down inside you that what I posted is 100% valid and that you can't refute it.

Why are you ignoring Post #65 LINK

I think the reason why you avoid totally discussion is because you are paid to promote your master's pseudoscience garbage and ignore the rebuttals as you are a mental midget who couldn't argue rationally because you are a child emotionally.

 

[ReinyDays]

because you are a child emotionally.

 

[Old Rocks]

Climate models "jigger" their models all the time even with the profoundly absurd RCP 8.5 mixed in.

You continue to show that you are allergic to my post #65 that scares you so much as you avoid it like holy water because as you know deep down inside you that what I posted is 100% valid and that you can't refute it.

Why are you ignoring Post #65 LINK

I think the reason why you avoid totally discussion is because you are paid to promote your master's pseudoscience garbage and ignore the rebuttals as you are a mental midget who couldn't argue rationally because you are a child emotionally.

So you have some cherry picked data, ignoring the fact that most of that is for just the US. We are not the whole world. However, every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that say AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

 

[Delldude]

We are not the whole world. However, every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that say AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

Wonder who pays for their research grants?

Climate misinformation by source: Roy Spencer

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

 

[Cellblock2429]

So you have some cherry picked data, ignoring the fact that most of that is for just the US. We are not the whole world. However, every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that say AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

View attachment 1117061

/——/ Quick, send Al Gore more money.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AI debunked the CC hysteria? This is very interesting, using AI to analyze 'scientific' data. There has been an extraordinary amount of unpermitted conjecture relative to 'peer reviewed findings' and it appears AI has come to specific conclusions based on available data.

The Climate Scam is Over..​

Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims​

On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate Change journal published a ground-breaking study using AI (Grok-3) to debunk the man-made climate crisis narrative. Click on the link below for the paper titled: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis:

Link

This peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man's role in the climate change narrative it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.

Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using AI to critically review scientific data will soon become the standard in both the physical and medical sciences.
______________________
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims. During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance.
______________________
The sun takes center stage instead. Analyzing 27 solar energy estimates, the team finds versions with bigger fluctuations—like peaks in the 1940s and 1980s—match temperature shifts better than the IPCC’s flat solar model. Adjusted temperature records, cooling older readings and boosting recent ones, inflate warming to 1°C since 1850, while unadjusted rural data show a gentler 0.5°C rise. “

This upends the climate story,” says Jonathan Cohler. “Nature, not humanity, may hold the wheel.” Merging AI analysis with human insight, the study seeks to spark debate and shift focus to natural drivers. It’s available at Science of Climate Change.
_____________________
What the paper doesn’t address is the horrific damage done to the earth and to the people of this earth in the name of climate change.

In 2021, during the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, the U.S. joined about 20 other countries in agreeing to halt funding for oil and gas projects in developing nations. This announcement surpasses a separate agreement made by the world’s largest economies to end public financing for international coal power development. Also in 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance for multilateral development banks “aimed at squeezing off fossil fuel financing except in certain circumstances.”

Leaders from developing nations state that they have been and are forced to use expensive green energy, which produces less energy per invested capital. This has made it even harder for billions of people to escape poverty. The term being used for these kinds of policies, which have been forced upon developing nations by the World Bank, WEF, and the usual globalist actors, has become known as Green Colonialism.

Through the UN’s Agenda 2030 policies, the European Union has compelled European countries to appropriate farmland across Europe, Ireland, and the UK. Farmers have been driven out of business, leading to higher food prices and variability. Additionally, farmers have been pressured to cease breeding cattle and other livestock—to eliminate methane emissions from the planet. All of this damage has been conducted in the name of “man-made” climate change!

Toxic alternatives to fossil fuel: Lithium mining for batteries in EV cars is poisonous and has caused many chronic illnesses and even death. Children are often used to mine lithium. The waste from these batteries is not easily disposed of. Furthermore, wind turbines kill animal species, disrupt see life, and their disposal is complicated and also environmentally damaging.

The Climate Scam is Over..

Peer-reviewed AI analysis completely debunks all of the "man-made" claims

www.malone.news

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL....Either Crick left the site or the money for his hokum "studies" have all dried up.

USAID stopped funding the AGWCult

 

[Leo123]

For the most part. Does man add into the CO2 engine? Sure, but it is likely not enough done long enough to have any major impact. So do climate-alarmists tend to exaggerate? Sure. That was admitted years ago when a whole bunch of emails from the EU exposed the fact that the climate people were all cherry-picking only the data that supported their position, while ignoring that which conflicted with it.

The actual stratigraphic and climatological record indicates that we are merely currently recovering from one of many mini ice ages within the Subatlantic chronozone of the Holocene and are really currently recovering more towards historically normal climatological conditions.

Environmentalism is nothing but a money making scheme. I know a contractor that does nothing but facilitate the adherence to environmental regulations and doesn't even pound one nail.