Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
MAROON? And you consider yourself the "educated" voter eh? LMAO. Fucking moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
MAROON? And you consider yourself the "educated" voter eh? LMAO. Fucking moron.
No thanks. Who other than Democrats wants to welcome legions of ignorant, uniformed voters to the polls? I certainly don't want to be obligated to their ignorant desires or choices. Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
.
Do you think it's time to start talking about compulsory voting?
.
Places with mandatory voting also have less wealth inequality, lower levels of political corruption and higher levels of satisfaction with the way democracy is working than voluntary systems."
Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
MAROON? And you consider yourself the "educated" voter eh? LMAO. Fucking moron.
Why should the vote of a maroon cancel out my informed vote?
MAROON? And you consider yourself the "educated" voter eh? LMAO. Fucking moron.
Yeah, you stupid fuck. Have you never watched cartoons? Roger Rabbit. This is old slang, as in "What a maroon."
Places with mandatory voting also have less wealth inequality, lower levels of political corruption and higher levels of satisfaction with the way democracy is working than voluntary systems."
They're also far more homogeneous in terms of population, so their shared values are higher and there is less variance around issues.
What are your plans to ethnically cleanse the US population so that it matches the population homogeneity of these other nations which you hold up as good examples for the US to follow?
Corruption/criminal activity exists in every walk of life, but----- but "Places with mandatory voting also have less wealth inequality, lower levels of political corruption and higher levels of satisfaction with the way democracy is working than voluntary systems."
.
No. Those who choose not to vote do so at their peril however. Often the law of big numbers kicks in and enough people are in the middle of the road to modulate any large swings of power and the man on the street is usually not directly affected by national votes so they can get by not voting. Every blue moon however...you're affected..
In this years mid-term election, a pathetic 36.6 percent voted.
In Australia about 92% of eligible voters voted in their last election.
Do you think it's time to start talking about compulsory voting?
The Economist explains
Where is it compulsory to vote?
Sep 19th 2013
<snip>
...in some countries skipping the polling booth can land you in trouble. In Australia non-voters can expect a letter from the electoral commission demanding an explanation for their absenteeism. If they don’t have a good excuse they are fined A$20 ($19). If they fail to pay they can end up in court, where the fine is upped to A$170, plus court fees. Refuse to cough up and they face jail. A survey by Britain’s electoral commission in 2006 categorised three other countries as having “very strict” compulsory-voting regimes. In Brazil and Peru, non-voters are banned from carrying out various administrative transactions (Brazilians cannot apply for passports or sit professional exams, in theory at least), as well as facing small fines. In Singapore, non-voters have their names removed from the electoral roll—which many of them are presumably not too worried by. A host of other countries have varyingly strict rules on voting, along with some curious get-outs. Illiterate people are excused in Brazil and Ecuador; soldiers are excluded in Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Lebanon. The elderly are off the hook in several countries. And in Bolivia, where voting is notionally compulsory, married people are enfranchised from the age of 18, whereas singletons must wait until they are 21.
Proponents of mandatory voting argue that democracy is too important to be optional. Others say that compulsory self-determination is something of a contradiction in terms.
<snip>
.