Terri4Trump
Gold Member
- Jun 22, 2019
- 7,465
- 1,634
- Thread starter
- #21
Wow, so now you agree with Trump, what a shock.
Hah! Good catch
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Wow, so now you agree with Trump, what a shock.
She helped lead us into two terrible wars, one we are still in. Complete disaster.She was part of a disastrous administration......
That's a lie.
She’s a disgrace.
That's a lie.
Anyone care to post something truthful and helpful to the conversation?
Both wars are still going on. The damage done by them when they invaded Iraq has not ended. Everything that took place in Syria is directly attributable to our invasion of Iraq.
If Iraq were still a regional threat to Iran they would not be taking tankers and maybe bombing oil refining stations.
Our invasion of Iraq will go down as one of the worst decisions in the history of the planet.
Our failure to carry out the war according to military strategy was the massive error. We had the choice to go in and completely wipe out Hussein's organization and select competent sychopants to take over military control. We allowed a serious power vacuum which has directly resulted in unacceptable instability in the entire region.
As a matter of fact, our entire Mideast Policy is a farce and completely unacceptable.
Rice, Powell, Bush and the rest of that crowd are directly responsible for it.
Our failure to carry out the war according to military strategy was the massive error. We had the choice to go in and completely wipe out Hussein's organization and select competent sychopants to take over military control. We allowed a serious power vacuum which has directly resulted in unacceptable instability in the entire region.
As a matter of fact, our entire Mideast Policy is a farce and completely unacceptable.
Rice, Powell, Bush and the rest of that crowd are directly responsible for it.
I don't understand your post. The military action was perfect. We took over a country that size in a couple of weeks. The failure was the political aftermath. First we established some boob as the "leader" (I forget his name) that cause anger among the Iraqis and it went downhill after that.
She was part of a disastrous administration......
That's a lie.
She’s a disgrace.
That's a lie.
Anyone care to post something truthful and helpful to the conversation?
The failure was invading a sovereign nation that was no threat to us......
The failure was invading a sovereign nation that was no threat to us......
Wrong answer.
As I posted before:
If we had invaded Germany in 1937, all of WWII and the Holocaust and the destruction of Europe and the following cold war would have been avoided at a miniscule tiny cost. Of course, I don't expect shallow socialist propagandists like you to think so deeply, but Bush did.
Saddam was every bit as evil as Hitler in his behavior. He demonstrated a willingness to invade neighbors. He WAS developing nukes, which the Israelis destroyed in the 80's. He DID use WMD's on his neighbors the Kurds, killing millions.
Again, I do not expect thoughtless shallow trolls like you to think this stuff through.
George Bush likely saved millions and millions of lies preventing whatever holocausts Saddam was dreaming of.
But you go right ahead and stick with your little CNN KoolAid analysis of what happened.
There are a lot of evil people out there in the world, 99% of them we just ignore
There are a lot of evil people out there in the world, 99% of them we just ignore
Well, if we were running trillion dollar surpluses and had a billion person army, we could handle them all. But we don't.
If we had invaded Germany in 1937
Saddam was every bit as evil as Hitler in his behavior.