Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL you basically just shit on the concept of "checks and balances". NiceThe WH is refusing to compromise any damn ways. Imagine that. "my way or the highway" bullshit.
And besides all of that bullshit rhetoric, the plans for this bill hasn't even been finalized. Typical knee-jerk bullshit.
The boner don't even know what he will try to do yet.
The White House sets policy and the H. of Rep. with the Senate pass the funding, if they don't it's on them. If they do with strings attached, knowing it will be vetoed and make politifal theater out of it, it's on them.
They then have the opportunity to overturn the veto; the Crazy Right
Wing will never convince the sane and pragmatic members of The Congress to drink their kool-ade - as We The People have seen since the "Boner" took office.
The house cant overturn a veto. They dont have the votes.
Regardless, the OP is bullshit. It isn't even fuckin finalized yet.
Those dems offered three dollars in cuts for one dollar in revenues that wouldn't have raised middle class rates. And that's one reason Obama is still potus.If you spend-o-holics had not run up a freaking $18 trillion dollar debt then you wouldn't be forced to cut spending now would you. If the debt doubles again then you people are going to know real pain and suffering so stop kicking the can down the road.
If you spend-o-holics had not run up a freaking $18 trillion dollar debt then you wouldn't be forced to cut spending now would you. If the debt doubles again then you people are going to know real pain and suffering so stop kicking the can down the road.
I am one hundred percent for cutting spending. Which is why I have been calling for a total ban on tax expenditures for years.There's nothing but IOUs in the SS trust fund.Fact. Social Security is paid out of appropriated funds.Nonsense.
Nope. Social Security is considered mandatory and is not subject to the appropriations process.
If the US hits the debt ceiling, the chances of not being able to pay Social Security and our military climbs with every passing day.
So cut spending.
So...presto! You just got handed $1.2 trillion! What will you do with it?
Me? I would lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and use some to pay down the debt. Then once the debt was paid off, I'd lower tax rates for everyone even more.
Problem fricking solved.
No but he is the one saying "my way or the highway"If the debt ceiling is not raised, Social Security checks cannot go out.GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price"
See link here:
GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price
IMO the Crazy Right Wing is putting tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Not only have they create a giant and maybe fatal schism within their party, they are planning on putting ideology first, the safety and security of the people a distant second, and potentially proving Franklin correct when he allegedly said, "Your have a Republic, if you can keep it".
What you you think? Question address to those who will actually think about this critical issue.
What was more callous than Obama threatening to withhold Social Security checks?
Obama was not the one refusing to raise the debt ceiling, piss drinker.
I am one hundred percent for cutting spending. Which is why I have been calling for a total ban on tax expenditures for years.There's nothing but IOUs in the SS trust fund.Fact. Social Security is paid out of appropriated funds.
Nope. Social Security is considered mandatory and is not subject to the appropriations process.
If the US hits the debt ceiling, the chances of not being able to pay Social Security and our military climbs with every passing day.
So cut spending.
So...presto! You just got handed $1.2 trillion! What will you do with it?
Me? I would lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and use some to pay down the debt. Then once the debt was paid off, I'd lower tax rates for everyone even more.
Problem fricking solved.
Sounds like what I would do.
I agree but it has been said there will be NO COMPROMISE.No but he is the one saying "my way or the highway"If the debt ceiling is not raised, Social Security checks cannot go out.GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price"
See link here:
GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price
IMO the Crazy Right Wing is putting tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Not only have they create a giant and maybe fatal schism within their party, they are planning on putting ideology first, the safety and security of the people a distant second, and potentially proving Franklin correct when he allegedly said, "Your have a Republic, if you can keep it".
What you you think? Question address to those who will actually think about this critical issue.
What was more callous than Obama threatening to withhold Social Security checks?
Obama was not the one refusing to raise the debt ceiling, piss drinker.
He sets the policy, the Majority in the H. of Rep. can't even agree on a leader, let alone bring forth a comprehensive compromise to the table.
How many times have they tried to repeal Obamacare? How many amendments did they offer to fix what needs fixing?
I am one hundred percent for cutting spending. Which is why I have been calling for a total ban on tax expenditures for years.There's nothing but IOUs in the SS trust fund.Nope. Social Security is considered mandatory and is not subject to the appropriations process.
If the US hits the debt ceiling, the chances of not being able to pay Social Security and our military climbs with every passing day.
So cut spending.
So...presto! You just got handed $1.2 trillion! What will you do with it?
Me? I would lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and use some to pay down the debt. Then once the debt was paid off, I'd lower tax rates for everyone even more.
Problem fricking solved.
Sounds like what I would do.
I suppose ^^^ this is one of the reasons you two aren't taken seriously.
Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
How about you send in money to pay what you think the government should do. I'll send them money to do what they are authorized to do.Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
And what might be the consequences and costs associated with such a policy?
How about the Tea Party members of Congress reduce their salary by 50% and reject the benefits they now receive, then they can talk honestly about cutting entitlements.
I agree but it has been said there will be NO COMPROMISE.No but he is the one saying "my way or the highway"If the debt ceiling is not raised, Social Security checks cannot go out.GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price"
See link here:
GOP conservatives unveil debt ceiling hike that comes with steep price
IMO the Crazy Right Wing is putting tens of millions of Americans in jeopardy. Not only have they create a giant and maybe fatal schism within their party, they are planning on putting ideology first, the safety and security of the people a distant second, and potentially proving Franklin correct when he allegedly said, "Your have a Republic, if you can keep it".
What you you think? Question address to those who will actually think about this critical issue.
What was more callous than Obama threatening to withhold Social Security checks?
Obama was not the one refusing to raise the debt ceiling, piss drinker.
He sets the policy, the Majority in the H. of Rep. can't even agree on a leader, let alone bring forth a comprehensive compromise to the table.
How many times have they tried to repeal Obamacare? How many amendments did they offer to fix what needs fixing?
Yes, the republicans are fuckin idiots. Even if they did pass it, I doubt they could override a veto. Waste of fuckin time. Just like the democrats.
Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
And what might be the consequences and costs associated with such a policy?
How about the Tea Party members of Congress reduce their salary by 50% and reject the benefits they now receive, then they can talk honestly about cutting entitlements.
I am one hundred percent for cutting spending. Which is why I have been calling for a total ban on tax expenditures for years.There's nothing but IOUs in the SS trust fund.
If the US hits the debt ceiling, the chances of not being able to pay Social Security and our military climbs with every passing day.
So cut spending.
So...presto! You just got handed $1.2 trillion! What will you do with it?
Me? I would lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and use some to pay down the debt. Then once the debt was paid off, I'd lower tax rates for everyone even more.
Problem fricking solved.
Sounds like what I would do.
I suppose ^^^ this is one of the reasons you two aren't taken seriously.
Yes, we all know that its revolting to pay off debt, live responsibly, balance check books, save money etc.
Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
And what might be the consequences and costs associated with such a policy?
How about the Tea Party members of Congress reduce their salary by 50% and reject the benefits they now receive, then they can talk honestly about cutting entitlements.
All of your loonbat brethren voted for that asinine healthcare fiasco. I don't recall the tea party being in power. I don't recall any repubs who voted for that failed policy either. Why arent your loonbats throwing away their cadillac policies?
How about you send in money to pay what you think the government should do. I'll send them money to do what they are authorized to do.Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
And what might be the consequences and costs associated with such a policy?
How about the Tea Party members of Congress reduce their salary by 50% and reject the benefits they now receive, then they can talk honestly about cutting entitlements.
Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.Looks good to me. The plan gives you 1.5 trillion to waste while you figure out how to cut 1/4 of that each year.
As a callous conservative I'm sure it does look good to you, of course that goes without thinking of the unintended (or maybe they are intended) impact on the aged, the infirm and all those babies not aborted.
And what might be the consequences and costs associated with such a policy?
How about the Tea Party members of Congress reduce their salary by 50% and reject the benefits they now receive, then they can talk honestly about cutting entitlements.
All of your loonbat brethren voted for that asinine healthcare fiasco. I don't recall the tea party being in power. I don't recall any repubs who voted for that failed policy either. Why arent your loonbats throwing away their cadillac policies?
Not only do you know nothing about budgets you know nothing about health care. Simply echoing the stuff you read or hear from right wing sources is both insufficient (to be considered credible) and foolish.
All made up figures.Let's see... medicare 380 billion a year food and housing 800 billion, healthcare 1 trillion... I'm sure we can find other place we can cut.
I am one hundred percent for cutting spending. Which is why I have been calling for a total ban on tax expenditures for years.So cut spending.
So...presto! You just got handed $1.2 trillion! What will you do with it?
Me? I would lower tax rates for EVERYONE, and use some to pay down the debt. Then once the debt was paid off, I'd lower tax rates for everyone even more.
Problem fricking solved.
Sounds like what I would do.
I suppose ^^^ this is one of the reasons you two aren't taken seriously.
Yes, we all know that its revolting to pay off debt, live responsibly, balance check books, save money etc.
Don't pretend you know anything about economics. Most citizens borrow to own a home, take a vacation or marry, buy a car or their children's braces.
All governments borrow and all budgets are plans, plans that can go awry for many reasons and necessitate modifications and expenditures unaccounted for and thus unplanned.
