Cop Blocking

Great way to experience the justice system from within. 'Interference with a criminal investigation' and whether a state allows a subject to be videotapes without consent coming readily to mind. Can be arrested for ANYTHING. Whether you actually end up being prosecuted and convicted is a completely different matter. But you will find yourself in handcuffs, in the back of police car, and then in a jail cell after getting stripped searched. So ask yourself first, "am I sure there's really nothing on tv tonight?" :)
 
Great way to experience the justice system from within. 'Interference with a criminal investigation' and whether a state allows a subject to be videotapes without consent coming readily to mind. Can be arrested for ANYTHING. Whether you actually end up being prosecuted and convicted is a completely different matter. But you will find yourself in handcuffs, in the back of police car, and then in a jail cell after getting stripped searched. So ask yourself first, "am I sure there's really nothing on tv tonight?" :)

False. In most cases, one doesn't need anybody's consent to video or audio record them in public, and one most especially doesn't need the consent of any public official being video or audio recorded. No one has any expectation of privacy in public.

» Supreme Court Upholds Right to Film Police, Even in Illinois Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

The very idea that the government should be empowered to stop a free people from doing so is absurd.

The only remaining concerns with regard to legality are covert audio recordings or any recordings for commercial purposes, and the laws in the handful of states, mostly run by Democrat political machines, that are intended to hamper the people's ability to monitor official conduct in public are being systematically challenged and shot down. In fact, the guts of these laws have already been ripped out by the federal courts, and rightly so.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top