Cordial relations with France

[there4eyeM]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

 

[gipper]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

 

[irosie91]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

The Met Opera Sings ‘La Marseillaise’

 

[OldLady]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

I don't like him being in Paris on Bastille Day. Too dangerous.

 

[OldLady]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

No, I think they just want Russia to butt out of our elections.
And our essential infrastructure.
And our cyberspace generally.

Yeah, yeah, I know we hack them too. We haven't done the equivalent of the Wikileaks emails yet, though. We can make our own decisions on who will be President without an adversarial government sticking its nose in and doing open theft and propaganda campaigns. SOB's.

 

[Correll]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

Actually the French REvolution was a bloodbath that many Americans of the time were horrified by, and WWI was way more about the British.


And what have they done for US lately?

 

[there4eyeM]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

I don't like him being in Paris on Bastille Day. Too dangerous.

Not to worry; he's already lost his head on numerous occasions.

 

[Correll]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

I don't like him being in Paris on Bastille Day. Too dangerous.

Not to worry; he's already lost his head on numerous occasions.

Yeah, the French Revolution was soooo worthy of being celebrated.

So, many political executions that they had to invent a machine to cut off heads.

 

[Iceweasel]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

I don't like him being in Paris on Bastille Day. Too dangerous.

Don't worry, he'll be fine.

 

[Iceweasel]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

I don't like him being in Paris on Bastille Day. Too dangerous.

Not to worry; he's already lost his head on numerous occasions.

As Griffith demonstrated wither her beheading porn.

 

[August West]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

Actually the French REvolution was a bloodbath that many Americans of the time were horrified by, and WWI was way more about the British.


And what have they done for US lately?

Verdun and Paris are in England? They did try to talk us out of invading Iraq to find non existent wmds. You remember that? Were you eating freedom fries before your main course of Crow?

 

[Correll]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

Actually the French REvolution was a bloodbath that many Americans of the time were horrified by, and WWI was way more about the British.


And what have they done for US lately?

Verdun and Paris are in England? They did try to talk us out of invading Iraq to find non existent wmds. You remember that? Were you eating freedom fries before your main course of Crow?

They said there wasn't WMDs?

Link please.

 

[August West]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

Actually the French REvolution was a bloodbath that many Americans of the time were horrified by, and WWI was way more about the British.


And what have they done for US lately?

Verdun and Paris are in England? They did try to talk us out of invading Iraq to find non existent wmds. You remember that? Were you eating freedom fries before your main course of Crow?

They said there wasn't WMDs?

Link please.

An empty can of Raid and a hazmat suit are not WMDs. 28,000 killed and wounded for nothing. Good job!

 

[Correll]

A dignified, civilized, friendly encounter between the two nations celebrated the French Revolution and the entry into WWI of the U.S. at their side. Co-operation instead of confrontation is the way forward.

Actually the French REvolution was a bloodbath that many Americans of the time were horrified by, and WWI was way more about the British.


And what have they done for US lately?

Verdun and Paris are in England? They did try to talk us out of invading Iraq to find non existent wmds. You remember that? Were you eating freedom fries before your main course of Crow?

They said there wasn't WMDs?

Link please.

An empty can of Raid and a hazmat suit are not WMDs. 28,000 killed and wounded for nothing. Good job!

You implied that they said there was no WMDs, prior to the invasion.


I asked you to back that shit up.

YOu have failed.

 

[eagle1462010]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

No, I think they just want Russia to butt out of our elections.
And our essential infrastructure.
And our cyberspace generally.

Yeah, yeah, I know we hack them too. We haven't done the equivalent of the Wikileaks emails yet, though. We can make our own decisions on who will be President without an adversarial government sticking its nose in and doing open theft and propaganda campaigns. SOB's.

They tried to influence elections in the last cycle, in the last cycle, in the last cycle.......................Where was the outrage then............committee hearings demanding investigations and changes...............

Suddenly it's life or death for our country..............SURE IT'S JUST TO FIX OR ELECTION PROCESS......

 

[Nia88]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

Liberals dont like war. We're not republicans. But it would be nice to have an election without Russian interference. Even if Trump didnt collude with the Russians, it clear that Russian did interfere. They want to see America fall.

 

[Correll]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

Liberals dont like war. We're not republicans. But it would be nice to have an election without Russian interference. Even if Trump didnt collude with the Russians, it clear that Russian did interfere. They want to see America fall.

Yet you libs have been pushing for war, in Syria and Russia.


It seems that you might be against war, in general.


BUT willing to embrace pro-war policies for partisan political gain, ie by thus opposing your political enemy Trump.


Despite the potentially huge cost in lives, potentially American lives.


This is beyond vile.

 

[Nia88]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

Liberals dont like war. We're not republicans. But it would be nice to have an election without Russian interference. Even if Trump didnt collude with the Russians, it clear that Russian did interfere. They want to see America fall.

Yet you libs have been pushing for war, in Syria and Russia.


It seems that you might be against war, in general.


BUT willing to embrace pro-war policies for partisan political gain, ie by thus opposing your political enemy Trump.


Despite the potentially huge cost in lives, potentially American lives.


This is beyond vile.

There's already war in Syria. There has been a push to oust Assad because he keeps killing his people but not necessarily a full on war.

Who's pushed for war in Russia? Yes there should be consequences for them, but war isn't the answer .

 

[Correll]

Makes sense, yet the Left and the Deep State appear to want war with Russia.

Liberals dont like war. We're not republicans. But it would be nice to have an election without Russian interference. Even if Trump didnt collude with the Russians, it clear that Russian did interfere. They want to see America fall.

Yet you libs have been pushing for war, in Syria and Russia.


It seems that you might be against war, in general.


BUT willing to embrace pro-war policies for partisan political gain, ie by thus opposing your political enemy Trump.


Despite the potentially huge cost in lives, potentially American lives.


This is beyond vile.

There's already war in Syria. There has been a push to oust Assad because he keeps killing his people but not necessarily a full on war.

Who's pushed for war in Russia? Yes there should be consequences for them, but war isn't the answer .

Your internal rationalizations for your support of pro-war policies will not matter to the dead, nor your responsibility for them.

"NOt necessarily a full on war"?

"consequences"?


You are like a child playing with fire.

When it gets out of control, your response will be to find someone else to blame and then cry about the dead.