Court: No warrant needed to obtain cellphone info

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How about if I call my lawyer or my doctor ?

This doesn’t make any sense.

On what grounds would the government obtain a court order to access a phone conversation between you and your doctor or lawyer?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Good, one step closer to exercising our Second Amendment rights to Restoring the Rule of Law. Let's hope the federal government accelerates it's suspension of the Constitution.

There you have it folks - The2ndAmendment actually WANTS the Constitution to be suspended.


I think its thus safe to say The2ndAmendment hates America.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

The idea that businesses can be compelled by the government to produce records against the will of the customer is outright tyrannical.

LOL! The customer doesn't own the business's records! The BUSINESS owns them.

By your idiotic reckoning, if I bought fertilizer to build a bomb to blow up innocent people, the government would have to ask me nicely before seizing the record of that transaction from the business who owns it.

 

[Contumacious]

Samuel Alito Will Save America’s Privacy


A lower court’s ruling on warrantless cellphone searches is doomed at the Supreme Court—thanks to Justice Alito.


By Mark Joseph Stern|Posted Wednesday, July 31, 2013, at 3:42 PM

A 5th Circuit ruling approved the collection of cellphone location records without a search warrant.

Photo by Craig F. Walker/Denver Post via Getty Images

In a 2-1 ruling on Tuesday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave the Justice Department a welcomed gift: the unfettered authority to collect location records from cellphones without a search warrant. According to the federal appeals court, the Fourth Amendment’s proscription on “unreasonable searches and seizures” doesn’t apply to cellphone records at all for the simple reason that “the Government does not require a member of the public to own or carry a phone.”

.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Samuel Alito Will Save America’s Privacy


A lower court’s ruling on warrantless cellphone searches is doomed at the Supreme Court—thanks to Justice Alito.


By Mark Joseph Stern|Posted Wednesday, July 31, 2013, at 3:42 PM

A 5th Circuit ruling approved the collection of cellphone location records without a search warrant.

Photo by Craig F. Walker/Denver Post via Getty Images

In a 2-1 ruling on Tuesday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave the Justice Department a welcomed gift: the unfettered authority to collect location records from cellphones without a search warrant. According to the federal appeals court, the Fourth Amendment’s proscription on “unreasonable searches and seizures” doesn’t apply to cellphone records at all for the simple reason that “the Government does not require a member of the public to own or carry a phone.”

.

Alito will save America from the conservative 5th circuit?

 

[Contumacious]

Samuel Alito Will Save America’s Privacy


A lower court’s ruling on warrantless cellphone searches is doomed at the Supreme Court—thanks to Justice Alito.


By Mark Joseph Stern|Posted Wednesday, July 31, 2013, at 3:42 PM

A 5th Circuit ruling approved the collection of cellphone location records without a search warrant.

Photo by Craig F. Walker/Denver Post via Getty Images

In a 2-1 ruling on Tuesday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave the Justice Department a welcomed gift: the unfettered authority to collect location records from cellphones without a search warrant. According to the federal appeals court, the Fourth Amendment’s proscription on “unreasonable searches and seizures” doesn’t apply to cellphone records at all for the simple reason that “the Government does not require a member of the public to own or carry a phone.”

.

Alito will save America from the conservative 5th circuit?

Firstly , the appellation "conservative" means nothing.

The question is weather the "judge" is a fascist - state supremacist or not.

Judge Dennis , the dissenter was a Bill Clinton nominee.

The majority was composed of

Reavly , who was a Jimmy Carter appointee

and

Clement, a Bush II, appointee.

.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Firstly , the appellation "conservative" means nothing.

Maybe to you it doesn't but ask any lawyer who has had cases in the 9th Circuit and in the 5th Circuit and the word begins to have meaning.

Almost all of the people still alive in the south who voted for Jimmy Carter are Republicans now.

 

[g5000]

How funny is it people are bitching about a court decision which is merely ratifying legislation which was signed into law by Reagan?

The Nazi references are particularly funny.

Wut?

And they are funny because

Your Nazi references are funny because in your kneejerk reflex partisan ignorance, you mistook this as an Obama thing, and thus had a party with the Nazi references.

As I pointed out, this has all been legal since Reagan.

And the domestic spying on American phone records has been going on since at least 2006. This was known in 2006. It was in all the papers.

 

[Contumacious]

How funny is it people are bitching about a court decision which is merely ratifying legislation which was signed into law by Reagan?

The Nazi references are particularly funny.

Wut?

And they are funny because

Your Nazi references are funny because in your kneejerk reflex partisan ignorance, you mistook this as an Obama thing, and thus had a party with the Nazi references.

As I pointed out, this has all been legal since Reagan.

And the domestic spying on American phone records has been going on since at least 2006. This was known in 2006. It was in all the papers.

Excuse me Ding Dong

the reason the federal government is a behemoth is because BOTH parties are populated by government supremacist scumbags.

Reagan, will all his bullshit rhetoric , did NOT reduce the size of government:

Conservative con man

"There was no "Reagan Revolution." Any "revolution" in the direction of liberty (in Ronnie's words "to get government off our backs") would reduce the total level of government spending. And that means reduce in absolute terms, not as proportion of the gross national product, or corrected for inflation, or anything else. There is no divine commandment that the federal government must always be at least as great a proportion of the national product as it was in 1980. If the government was a monstrous swollen Leviathan in 1980, as libertarians were surely convinced, as the inchoate American masses were apparently convinced and as Reagan and his cadre claimed to believe, then cutting government spending was in order. At the very least, federal government spending should have been frozen, in absolute terms, so that the rest of the economy would be allowed to grow in contrast. Instead, Ronald Reagan cut nothing, even in the heady first year, 1981. "

.