🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Dangerous Times: Obama Bows To The Mullahs

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Jul 5, 2004
13,399
1,707
245
It looks like the fix is in.

The mullahs will certainly get their nukes and ICBMs, and neither Israel nor the Saudis (who are scared to death of the mullahs) will rely on American protection as long as Obama is in office.

Obama just put out the welcome mat for Mullah Rouhani, the killer of 245 U.S. Marines in Beirut in 1984, and the ultraleft UK Guardian just claimed that its readers voted for Great Humanitarian Rouhani to be the next winner of the Nobel Peace Prize.

The post-Stalinist Guardian is not known for telling the truth too often, and nobody knows if that "survey" is real or not. But the Guardian and the BBC are the two biggest hard-left organs of propaganda in Europe, and they have long promoted a kind of Hitler-Stalin Pact between European socialists in the EU and radical Muslims of both stripes in the Middle East. These are politically powerful signals, and they will be read as such around the world.

Here is the way the dominos seem to be falling: We are going back to a binary power split between...

....


Under Obama, the United States is letting the world fall into crisis. Chances are that he wants to use the resulting chaos to force Israel into making concessions. But countries do not willingly commit suicide, and Israel has a much better option, which is to bring in Putin's Russia to balance a far-left-ruled United States.

In previous Middle East crises the United States could act as a trusted mediator -- but nobody can trust Obama, as the Republicans in Congress know so well. Any peace settlement will therefore require a two-nuclear-power guarantee to be trustworthy.

Obama is a crisis-monger. It is the only way he knows how to operate. But nobody can predict how his crises will come out. So far he has mainly destroyed American credibility.



Read more: Articles: Dangerous Times: Obama Bows to the Mullahs
Follow us: [MENTION=20123]American[/MENTION]Thinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
Dangerous Times: Obama Bows To The Mullahs

What a completely loopy OP. Next.
 
Last edited:
meanwhile Hussein Obama keeps killing or capturing Al Qaeda leaders.

we should be glad he has an olive branch in one hand and a sword in the other.

its how a responsible leader acts.
 
meanwhile Hussein Obama keeps killing or capturing Al Qaeda leaders.

we should be glad he has an olive branch in one hand and a sword in the other.

its how a responsible leader acts.

so why is he arming Al Qaeda in Syria....?
 
Ever since Obama pretended to have "killed bin Laden" Val Jarrett has been running AQ
 
so why is he arming Al Qaeda in Syria....?

the Free Syrian Army, isn't Al Qaeda.

the FSA is not 'moderate' by any means.....they do not seek a secular state....but instead they want to impose sharia law and make Christians and Alawites second class citizens...it is also infiltrated with the Muslim Brotherhood...

i guess you can call that a modicum better than the jihadis groups who want to KILL Christians and Alawites.....but that still isn't 'moderate' by western standards.....

and guns that Obama supplies will of course eventually get into the hands of the jihadist AQ groups....why is Obama putting us on the same side as AQ....?
 
American voters aren't in the mood for an aggressive foreign policy against any country. We saw this with Syria, and it's about time. Too bad the voters didn't feel this way in 2003, when it could've kept the GOP from making their Iraq War Debacle.

Americans would rather put up with a nuclear Iran than start another war over WMD, and conservatives need to accept this and work on getting past it.

Besides, it's the fault of conservatives that Americans no longer support the GOP's cowboy adventurism. Had the Iraq War not been such a mess, maybe the voters would support your stupid aggressiveness against Iran. But the GOP hamhanded it from day one, and now you have no one to blame but yourself for the lack of support for your gung-ho stupidity.

So, am I basically blaming the GOP for the possibility of Iran nukes? You bet I am.
 
American voters aren't in the mood for an aggressive foreign policy against any country. We saw this with Syria, and it's about time. Too bad the voters didn't feel this way in 2003, when it could've kept the GOP from making their Iraq War Debacle.

Americans would rather put up with a nuclear Iran than start another war over WMD, and conservatives need to accept this and work on getting past it.

Besides, it's the fault of conservatives that Americans no longer support the GOP's cowboy adventurism. Had the Iraq War not been such a mess, maybe the voters would support your stupid aggressiveness against Iran. But the GOP hamhanded it from day one, and now you have no one to blame but yourself for the lack of support for your gung-ho stupidity.

So, am I basically blaming the GOP for the possibility of Iran nukes? You bet I am.

in other words.....damned if we do.....damned if we don't......:talktothehand:
 

Forum List

Back
Top