If it already wasn't, The Supreme Court Is Now On The Ballot.

[struth]

Forgive him. He's simply parroting lines fed to him by his masters. You can't blame the tool.

You can bet if thomas were white he wouldn’t be lying about him

 

[Rawley]

You can bet if thomas were white he wouldn’t be lying about him

Nah, They are lying about Alito too

 

[struth]

Nah, They are lying about Alito too

The demklan hates Catholics too

 

[berg80]

There is no extremism, you folks are just little bitches when you don't get your way. Grow up.

How frustrating it must be for you to have such a stunted intellect.

 

[berg80]

Nah, They are lying about Alito too

Compromised comprehension skills can lead to those kinds of erroneous conclusions.

 

[berg80]

I doubt anything could penetrate the 4 inches of neanderthal Dem skull.

I appreciate your humiliating capitulation.

 

[Rawley]

Compromised comprehension skills can lead to those kinds of erroneous conclusions.

Hurry up, I'm holding my breath waiting for your answer as to who Uncle Clarence took money from with cases before the court.

 

[berg80]

Hurry up, I'm holding my breath waiting for your answer as to who Uncle Clarence took money from with cases before the court.

Harlan Crow. Heard of him?

 

[struth]

Harlan Crow. Heard of him?

What case did he have before the court?

 

[berg80]

What case did he have before the court?

Google... Clarence Thomas's billionaire friend did have business before the supreme court

 

[ThisIsMe]

It’s hard to know the precise combination of developments that changed President Biden’s mind about Supreme Court reforms and prompted him to place them more centrally in the framework of the 2024 election.

Was it the ethics scandals of Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and the Supreme Court’s own ineptitude in dealing with them? Was it the series of controversial decisions across a whole host of issues and areas of civic life in which the court wrested power away from the executive and legislative branches and placed it firmly in the judicial branch? Was it the six-justice conservative majority aggressively uprooting the court’s own precedents in pursuit of its own preferred legal and policy outcomes? Was it the fact that he’s trailing in the polls with his own re-election more at risk that at any previous point in his presidency?

All of the above are in play, of course. A tipping point was reached, and it’s unlikely any one development was the difference-maker.

Biden Elevates Supreme Court Reform To His Re-Election Agenda

It’s hard to know the precise combination of developments that prompted President Biden to embrace Supreme Court reforms.

talkingpointsmemo.com

trump's Court's popularity is in the shitter. Deservedly so. Perhaps this is a move by Joe to capitalize on voter sentiment. No matter the motive, reform is overdue. There must be accountability for crass ethics violations and for the lack of recusals when there are demonstrable conflicts of interest (hello Clarence). I can understand the Founders wanting to somewhat insulate the Court in order to maintain its independence. But they did not contemplate such a corrupt Court nor such polarized times.

So, if the court is a majority democrat and they are enacting the democrat agenda…THEN they would be a fair court…right?

Also, thomas hasn’t done anything wrong, there is no impropriety because none of those people have cases in front of the court.

 

[struth]

Google... Clarence Thomas's billionaire friend did have business before the supreme court

I didn’t find anything…which was what I expected

 

[berg80]

So, if the court is a majority democrat and they are enacting the democrat agenda…THEN they would be a fair court…right?

Also, thomas hasn’t done anything wrong, there is no impropriety because none of those people have cases in front of the court.

Failing to report lavish gifts he is required to report isn't doing anything wrong?

 

[berg80]

I didn’t find anything…which was what I expected

How odd, that's what I expected too. It was reported by Bloomberg.

 

[struth]

How odd, that's what I expected too. It was reported by Bloomberg.

What was?

 

[fncceo]

It’s hard to know the precise combination of developments that changed President Biden’s mind

You mean besides extreme desperation?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Failing to report lavish gifts he is required to report isn't doing anything wrong?

A rules violation, certainly not cause for recusal.

So fine him or whatever it is they do for that infraction and then move on

 

[justoffal]

It’s hard to know the precise combination of developments that changed President Biden’s mind about Supreme Court reforms and prompted him to place them more centrally in the framework of the 2024 election.

Was it the ethics scandals of Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and the Supreme Court’s own ineptitude in dealing with them? Was it the series of controversial decisions across a whole host of issues and areas of civic life in which the court wrested power away from the executive and legislative branches and placed it firmly in the judicial branch? Was it the six-justice conservative majority aggressively uprooting the court’s own precedents in pursuit of its own preferred legal and policy outcomes? Was it the fact that he’s trailing in the polls with his own re-election more at risk that at any previous point in his presidency?

All of the above are in play, of course. A tipping point was reached, and it’s unlikely any one development was the difference-maker.

Biden Elevates Supreme Court Reform To His Re-Election Agenda

It’s hard to know the precise combination of developments that prompted President Biden to embrace Supreme Court reforms.

talkingpointsmemo.com

trump's Court's popularity is in the shitter. Deservedly so. Perhaps this is a move by Joe to capitalize on voter sentiment. No matter the motive, reform is overdue. There must be accountability for crass ethics violations and for the lack of recusals when there are demonstrable conflicts of interest (hello Clarence). I can understand the Founders wanting to somewhat insulate the Court in order to maintain its independence. But they did not contemplate such a corrupt Court nor such polarized times.

Stop being a big cry baby. There's nothing wrong with the court the way it is. Stop looking for shortcuts and stop trying to control everything. This is what Harry Reid got you.. This is what you wanted... so go ahead... make more mistakes and have them shoved up your ass again.

 

[Rawley]

Harlan Crow. Heard of him?

Bzzzzz The only question is whether you are a liar or an ignorant stooge. Crow has never had a case before the SC (at least when Uncle Clarence has been on the bench, I don't about before)