Redfish
Diamond Member
so the back story is fake news??? who put it out?no I am not, explain
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
so the back story is fake news??? who put it out?no I am not, explain
shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or theI said there is a process for amending the constitution that includes Congress. Was I wrong?
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artV-1/ALDE_00000507/
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
They can and have already impeached a Supreme Court Justice, he just wasn't convicted in the Senate. The requirement of good behavior allows them to removed for bad behavior.
Why don't you try expressing a complete thought? Was I wrong? Congress does have a role to play in the amendment process, no? They can propose Amendments, no? So what unilateral action are you accusing us of wanting now, Clown?shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the
You mean this:Article III
Then who would enforce it? It has to have some teeth to it or it is meaningless.
Taking away a woman's right to choose is a lie?![]()
Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report
President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.www.foxnews.com
President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.
"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.
Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.
What is very troubling is he believes he should do so.![]()
Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report
President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.www.foxnews.com
President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.
"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.
Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.
Not congress.
For one thing, they don't even enforce their own (which are really watered down as it is).
I never mentioned that so I'm not sure why you even brought that up.
The court created a ruling out of nothing that covered the Executive.
It should work out fine for an unethical judge.
A few very BIG decisions… one after the other
The court created a ruling out of nothing that covered the Executive.
It would be ignorant for any of us to say for sure. All we have are media reports. If the claims are being made then there should be a hearing where the person can make a defense and the consequences imposed if they are found to have violated their oath of office. This process is spotty at best which is why Biden is calling for reforms.which justice has done something unethical and what did he or she do? you obviously think one or more of them have been bribed, who and when?
so the back story is fake news??? who put it out?
The Democratic Party supports religious freedomYour party is full of people that hate religion and especially hate Christianity because it is the one true religion. I mean, why does the Democrat Party support Islam, which is far more anti-womens rights and anti-LGBTQ than Christianity? Because they know it’s a false religion that steers people away from God. The only “Christian churches” they support are fake ones that support gay marriage. Their whole purpose is to keep people from Jesus. Look at your leftwing Hollywood elites who love displaying all things Satanic. Hollywood is run by a gang of pedophiles and rapists like Harvey Weinstein, who nearly every Hollywood actor was great friends with and adored.
It ain’t leaning rightin your opinion because the SC is currently leaning right, admit it, you would not be pushing this if we had a left leaning SC as we did for many years.
It supports all things pagan and satanic.The Democratic Party supports religious freedom
As does this country (with exceptions like you) all the way back to the founding of Rhode Island and Roger Williams
You’re a fucking nutjobIt supports all things pagan and satanic.
It supports all things pagan and satanic.