Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We do it already ... your private insurance company rations care.That's it? That's your answer? 'Everyone else is doing it so we may as well do it too'?
They do ration to an extent. But, with the government, the rationing is going to really hit the aged hard, the ones that need it the most.
This I cannot subscribe to, this is the area where private insurance stands out from the government solutions.
If your young, it's easy to say the "duty to die" crap. But, as the young grow old, I guarantee that attitude will change.
We do it already ... your private insurance company rations care.
They do ration to an extent. But, with the government, the rationing is going to really hit the aged hard, the ones that need it the most.
Does the term pre-existing condition strike any bells?
This I cannot subscribe to, this is the area where private insurance stands out from the government solutions.
If by "stands out" you mean "sucks the life out of" I suppose you have a point
If your young, it's easy to say the "duty to die" crap. But, as the young grow old, I guarantee that attitude will change.
Nobody is saying that...
All we're saying is that it is ALREADY being done...by those private insurance companies that apparently you think are so much more humane than the government.
We do it already ... your private insurance company rations care.
They do ration to an extent. But, with the government, the rationing is going to really hit the aged hard, the ones that need it the most. This I cannot subscribe to, this is the area where private insurance stands out from the government solutions.
If your young, it's easy to say the "duty to die" crap. But, as the young grow old, I guarantee that attitude will change.
Silly ass. If there is a choice of an expensive procedure for a young person with their productive life ahead of them, or for me, with my most productive years past, it would seem to me that the right decision is obvious. No matter how much I dislike it.
This is obviously a red herring, in any case. Were it not, the nations with national health care systems would have lower longevity than we do. However, that is not the case. They not only have much longer average longevity, they have seniors that are healthier than those in this nation.
But whine and cry all you like. We are going to have a health care system in this nation, finally. And you will help pay for it.
But, I know if it came down to it, you would be screaming for your pathetic life like a baby.
We do it already ... your private insurance company rations care.
They do ration to an extent. But, with the government, the rationing is going to really hit the aged hard, the ones that need it the most. This I cannot subscribe to, this is the area where private insurance stands out from the government solutions.
If your young, it's easy to say the "duty to die" crap. But, as the young grow old, I guarantee that attitude will change.
Do you REALLY think that if Blue Cross Blue Shield was insuring 80 year olds they wouldn't ration care as much, if not more, than the government insurance does???
When you think about it, these private insurance companies have it made in the shade! They insure people only up to age 65, after which time most people go onto Medicare at a time in their lives when they likely will have the MOST medical expenses.
And if an insurance company has the unforunate luck of having one of it's 30 year old beneficiaries get cancer or another expensive disease, they only have to insure them up to the point that the individual is declared disabled and starts early Medicare coverage.
And from my experience, Medicare does not ration ANYTHING. There is no prior authorization needed for any test and everything that is done is paid for. If it is found that tests were performed inappropriately, the provider ordering them will be royally fucked...but at least there is never a denial of care for any test that your provider orders or performs (except for preventive care which makes no sense at all).
They do ration to an extent. But, with the government, the rationing is going to really hit the aged hard, the ones that need it the most.
Does the term pre-existing condition strike any bells?
If by "stands out" you mean "sucks the life out of" I suppose you have a point
If your young, it's easy to say the "duty to die" crap. But, as the young grow old, I guarantee that attitude will change.
Nobody is saying that...
All we're saying is that it is ALREADY being done...by those private insurance companies that apparently you think are so much more humane than the government.
Yeah I'm saying I will have better insurance from my "private expensive insurance company" than from the government. There isn't a word or phrase you can say that tells me different. The government is incapable of running an insurance company of that magnatide and you can't prove otherwise. You disecting what I said line by line is no more than a liberal opinion from you. I guess all I can say is, go pound sand.
Does the term pre-existing condition strike any bells?
If by "stands out" you mean "sucks the life out of" I suppose you have a point
Nobody is saying that...
All we're saying is that it is ALREADY being done...by those private insurance companies that apparently you think are so much more humane than the government.
Yeah I'm saying I will have better insurance from my "private expensive insurance company" than from the government. There isn't a word or phrase you can say that tells me different. The government is incapable of running an insurance company of that magnatide and you can't prove otherwise. You disecting what I said line by line is no more than a liberal opinion from you. I guess all I can say is, go pound sand.
The government already runs the largest insurance company in the world, dude. Social security.
It also runs the two largest HC systems in the world.
Try again.
