Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Warming below 2,000 meter is not mine. It has been published in multiple peer reviewed studies.
Are you attempting to suggest that it's impossible to build a temperature sensor that will go below 2,000 meters?
Pal Review ... And its still bull shit.
There are plenty of devices capable but at that depth they are not reliable, at the moment. The pressures cause massive failures and they are hard to maintain. Ask any one on a deep sea drilling rig.
Warming below 2,000 meter is not mine. It has been published in multiple peer reviewed studies.
Are you attempting to suggest that it's impossible to build a temperature sensor that will go below 2,000 meters?
Pal Review ... And its still bull shit.
There are plenty of devices capable but at that depth they are not reliable, at the moment. The pressures cause massive failures and they are hard to maintain. Ask any one on a deep sea drilling rig.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. This is my field. It's obviously not yours.
OOOOOOO more cut and paste alarmist drivel without basis in facts...
How many times I got to tell you... MODELS ARE NOT EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING!OOOOOOO more cut and paste alarmist drivel without basis in facts...
LOLOLOL......so you idiotically imagine that NOAA's State of the Climate analysis is just "alarmist drivel without basis in fact", eh? LOLOL.....your brainwashed denial of reality and the crackpot conspiracy theories you base your denial on are sooooo insane and sooooo delusional, you deniers are lucky you haven't been netted up and taken to the 'funny farm' by now.
Only brainwashed denier cult retards imagine that the scientific understanding of the Earth's climate systems and atmospheric physics are entirely based on computer models. Scientists base their conclusions primarily on the enormous amounts of hard physical evidence that indicates that the world is rapidly warming and previously stable climate patterns are changing.How many times I got to tell you... MODELS ARE NOT EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING!OOOOOOO more cut and paste alarmist drivel without basis in facts...
LOLOLOL......so you idiotically imagine that NOAA's State of the Climate analysis is just "alarmist drivel without basis in fact", eh? LOLOL.....your brainwashed denial of reality and the crackpot conspiracy theories you base your denial on are sooooo insane and sooooo delusional, you deniers are lucky you haven't been netted up and taken to the 'funny farm' by now.
No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
Lets look at those models again shall we?
View attachment 32773
Dr. Roy Spencer has this number nailed...
Warming below 2,000 meter is not mine. It has been published in multiple peer reviewed studies.
Are you attempting to suggest that it's impossible to build a temperature sensor that will go below 2,000 meters?
Pal Review ... And its still bull shit.
There are plenty of devices capable but at that depth they are not reliable, at the moment. The pressures cause massive failures and they are hard to maintain. Ask any one on a deep sea drilling rig.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. This is my field. It's obviously not yours.
No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
Lets look at those models again shall we?
View attachment 32773
Dr. Roy Spencer has this number nailed...
He does. He has it nailed to his resignation because the inept dishonesty of this publication pretty much marks the end of the man's career.
What is the loss to earths energy budget when 15 degrees in Latitude is now covered in white snow and ice? (almost immediate reflection to space) There have been over 900 maximum low records in the southern hemisphere above 70 degree Lat in the last 5 months. The Albedo change and loss of warming to water is the equivalent of 3.6 ml Sq Km. @ 136W/M^2. (489.6 * 10^6 Watts) that much heat loss to our system will have consequences long term.
Two questions come to mind. The first is the reduced thermoline circulations and how that will impair the global circulations as a whole? And the second is the loss of heat in mid ocean areas that the polar circulations would have assisted in providing?
No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
Your reply amounts to just more insane drivel from a clueless retard, and is the equivalent of a member of the Flat Earth Society telling NASA that he is the real scientists and they are in a cult. BTW, you wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you, you poor demented cretin.No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
More proof that religious dogma trumps real science.
Why does the AGW cult hate real science?
Your reply amounts to just more insane drivel from a clueless retard, and is the equivalent of a member of the Flat Earth Society telling NASA that he is the real scientists and they are in a cult. BTW, you wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you, you poor demented cretin.No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
More proof that religious dogma trumps real science.
Why does the AGW cult hate real science?
It seems you're clueless about the meaning of "irony" too, you poor bewildered nutjob.Your reply amounts to just more insane drivel from a clueless retard, and is the equivalent of a member of the Flat Earth Society telling NASA that he is the real scientists and they are in a cult. BTW, you wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you, you poor demented cretin.No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
More proof that religious dogma trumps real science.
Why does the AGW cult hate real science?
The irony of this post from the AGW cult..
It seems you're clueless about the meaning of "irony" too, you poor bewildered nutjob.Your reply amounts to just more insane drivel from a clueless retard, and is the equivalent of a member of the Flat Earth Society telling NASA that he is the real scientists and they are in a cult. BTW, you wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you, you poor demented cretin.No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..Here we go again with the rapid warming bull shit... And all from Cricks FAILED MODELS!!
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
More proof that religious dogma trumps real science.
Why does the AGW cult hate real science?
The irony of this post from the AGW cult..
There are no "proofs" in science, dumbo. There is only a preponderance of evidence supporting one explanation for any phenomenon over all the others.It seems you're clueless about the meaning of "irony" too, you poor bewildered nutjob.Your reply amounts to just more insane drivel from a clueless retard, and is the equivalent of a member of the Flat Earth Society telling NASA that he is the real scientists and they are in a cult. BTW, you wouldn't know "real science" if it bit you, you poor demented cretin.No, you poor brainwashed cretin, the scientific conclusions about Earth's rapid warming are based on hard physical evidence, including rising temperatures, melting ice, changing seasonal timing, animal and plant migration to higher elevations or northward, rising sea levels, etc., etc..
You denier cult myths are fraudulent hokum.
More proof that religious dogma trumps real science.
Why does the AGW cult hate real science?
The irony of this post from the AGW cult..
Argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument to ignorance). This is the fallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn't been proven false. For example, someone might argue that global warming is certainly occurring because nobody has demonstrated conclusively that it is not. But failing to prove the global warming theory false is not the same as proving it true.
