Defunding immigration bill....Impossible

[TooTall]

Defunding the bill is impossible because it isn't a bill?

Defunding the "not doing" of something? How does that work?

Nobody said it was a bill did they? The Congress pays for the functions of government through appropriations. Because they very seldom pass a budget, they continue paying for programs with a continuing resolution. Maybe the Republicans can actually pass a budget this coming year, but that remains to be seen.

Hey idiot! Look at the thread title you stupid fuck.

Nobody said it was a bill did they?
Do you know what this is ? you silly bastard!

 

[PredFan]

Defunding the bill is impossible because it isn't a bill?

Defunding the "not doing" of something? How does that work?

Nobody said it was a bill did they? The Congress pays for the functions of government through appropriations. Because they very seldom pass a budget, they continue paying for programs with a continuing resolution. Maybe the Republicans can actually pass a budget this coming year, but that remains to be seen.

Hey idiot! Look at the thread title you stupid fuck.

Nobody said it was a bill did they?
Do you know what this is ? you silly bastard!

Did you look at the thread title? No you didn't.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Obutthurt is a socialist pos like the libtards on here. He knows this is wrong for America and will do it regardless.

It's a little early for you to start hitting the booze... don't ya think?

I am right and you know it, but you are just too stupid to go against your fantasy lover. Retard.

 

[g5000]

Defunding the bill is impossible because it isn't a bill?

A defunding bill. Not defunding a bill.

Ah! Still, how much money could it cost to not do something?

That's the point I made in my first and second posts in this topic.

 

[BullKurtz]

House GOP panel Defunding immigration order impossible TheHill

It would be “impossible" to defund President Obama’s executive actions on immigration through a government spending bill, the House Appropriations Committee said Thursday.
In a statement released by Committee Chairman Hal Rogers's (R-Ky.) office hours before Obama's scheduled national address, the committee said the primary agency responsible for implementing Obama's actions is funded entirely by user fees.
As a result, the committee said the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) agency would be able to continue to collect fees and carry out its operations even if the government shut down.
We cannot, literally cannot, defund that agency in an appropriations bill because we don’t appropriate that agency. That agency is entirely fee-funded,” spokeswoman Jennifer Hing said.
“As of right now, our understanding is the primary agency responsible for implementing any type of executive order is CIS and we don’t fund CIS. There are no appropriated dollars,” she added.

Wrong....Homeland Security is the office in charge....easy to line item veto their spending. Once again you're caught lying.

 

[g5000]

Wrong....Homeland Security is the office in charge....easy to line item veto their spending. Once again you're caught lying.

What line item would you defund if Obama stays the deportation of immigrants that Congress is going to give amnesty to?

 

[TooTall]

Defunding the bill is impossible because it isn't a bill?

Defunding the "not doing" of something? How does that work?

Nobody said it was a bill did they? The Congress pays for the functions of government through appropriations. Because they very seldom pass a budget, they continue paying for programs with a continuing resolution. Maybe the Republicans can actually pass a budget this coming year, but that remains to be seen.

Hey idiot! Look at the thread title you stupid fuck.

Nobody said it was a bill did they?
Do you know what this is ? you silly bastard!

Did you look at the thread title? No you didn't.

I can't see the thread title after scrolling down three or four posts. Did my answer offend you?

 

[PredFan]

Defunding the bill is impossible because it isn't a bill?

Defunding the "not doing" of something? How does that work?

Nobody said it was a bill did they? The Congress pays for the functions of government through appropriations. Because they very seldom pass a budget, they continue paying for programs with a continuing resolution. Maybe the Republicans can actually pass a budget this coming year, but that remains to be seen.

Hey idiot! Look at the thread title you stupid fuck.

Nobody said it was a bill did they?
Do you know what this is ? you silly bastard!

Did you look at the thread title? No you didn't.

I can't see the thread title after scrolling down three or four posts. Did my answer offend you?

Thread title says it's a bill, nit wit.

 

[rightwinger]

House GOP panel Defunding immigration order impossible TheHill

It would be “impossible" to defund President Obama’s executive actions on immigration through a government spending bill, the House Appropriations Committee said Thursday.
In a statement released by Committee Chairman Hal Rogers's (R-Ky.) office hours before Obama's scheduled national address, the committee said the primary agency responsible for implementing Obama's actions is funded entirely by user fees.
As a result, the committee said the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) agency would be able to continue to collect fees and carry out its operations even if the government shut down.
We cannot, literally cannot, defund that agency in an appropriations bill because we don’t appropriate that agency. That agency is entirely fee-funded,” spokeswoman Jennifer Hing said.
“As of right now, our understanding is the primary agency responsible for implementing any type of executive order is CIS and we don’t fund CIS. There are no appropriated dollars,” she added.

Wrong....Homeland Security is the office in charge....easy to line item veto their spending. Once again you're caught lying.

Wrong again buck-o
But thanks so much for playing

 

[BullKurtz]

House GOP panel Defunding immigration order impossible TheHill

It would be “impossible" to defund President Obama’s executive actions on immigration through a government spending bill, the House Appropriations Committee said Thursday.
In a statement released by Committee Chairman Hal Rogers's (R-Ky.) office hours before Obama's scheduled national address, the committee said the primary agency responsible for implementing Obama's actions is funded entirely by user fees.
As a result, the committee said the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) agency would be able to continue to collect fees and carry out its operations even if the government shut down.
We cannot, literally cannot, defund that agency in an appropriations bill because we don’t appropriate that agency. That agency is entirely fee-funded,” spokeswoman Jennifer Hing said.
“As of right now, our understanding is the primary agency responsible for implementing any type of executive order is CIS and we don’t fund CIS. There are no appropriated dollars,” she added.

Wrong....Homeland Security is the office in charge....easy to line item veto their spending. Once again you're caught lying.

Wrong again buck-o
But thanks so much for playing

This ain't a game punk....and if it was it would invoke the mercy rule for the number of times you been caught lying.

 

[BullKurtz]

Wrong....Homeland Security is the office in charge....easy to line item veto their spending. Once again you're caught lying.

What line item would you defund if Obama stays the deportation of immigrants that Congress is going to give amnesty to?

Easy, the issuance of SS cards, green cards, federal guidelines for issuance of drivers licenses....most of this has already been purchased by the piece of shit in advance but we can make a mess of the implementing.....BTW...the Feds OWE the State of Arizona $900.000,000 for the warehousing of their illegals....how about paying up, motherfucker.

 

[NLT]

Liberals what is the advantage of letting 5+ million illlegal immigrants stay in this country and take all the low income work from the poor legal residenst of the US? Besides creating 5+ million more democratic voters? Be honest, how is this advantageous to the US?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

House GOP panel Defunding immigration order impossible TheHill

It would be “impossible" to defund President Obama’s executive actions on immigration through a government spending bill, the House Appropriations Committee said Thursday.
In a statement released by Committee Chairman Hal Rogers's (R-Ky.) office hours before Obama's scheduled national address, the committee said the primary agency responsible for implementing Obama's actions is funded entirely by user fees.
As a result, the committee said the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) agency would be able to continue to collect fees and carry out its operations even if the government shut down.
We cannot, literally cannot, defund that agency in an appropriations bill because we don’t appropriate that agency. That agency is entirely fee-funded,” spokeswoman Jennifer Hing said.
“As of right now, our understanding is the primary agency responsible for implementing any type of executive order is CIS and we don’t fund CIS. There are no appropriated dollars,” she added.

 

[rightwinger]

Liberals what is the advantage of letting 5+ million illlegal immigrants stay in this country and take all the low income work from the poor legal residenst of the US? Besides creating 5+ million more democratic voters? Be honest, how is this advantageous to the US?

They get to work on the books
They get to pay taxes
They are covered by all labor laws
We don't have to expend money chasing them
They can go home when they please
Their existence really pisses off conservatives