Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?
Tag.......No, you will always be "it", troll.Tag you're it.........Thats about all you have left, isnt it?Yeah, that is probably like secret knowledge in your social circles, loli'm surprised you actually know what a comma is let alone be able to spell it.........
Oh, by the way tag, you're it.........
tag.....roflmao
(And the hysterically funny part is you have no idea why.......)
So you are wrong by proxy arguments now, that is fine, you are still wrong.Tag.......No, you will always be "it", troll.Tag you're it.........Thats about all you have left, isnt it?Yeah, that is probably like secret knowledge in your social circles, lol
Oh, by the way tag, you're it.........
tag.....roflmao
(And the hysterically funny part is you have no idea why.......)
With any luck you've managed to pop a few blood vessels.........It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?
Oh, yes, you are, several things; a brain, honesty, moral bearings, a conscience, I guess I will leave it there for now.
Tag.......So you are wrong by proxy arguments now, that is fine, you are still wrong.Tag.......No, you will always be "it", troll.Tag you're it.........Thats about all you have left, isnt it?
Oh, by the way tag, you're it.........
tag.....roflmao
(And the hysterically funny part is you have no idea why.......)
It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?Look at the first code you posted, the second would contradict the first.Now that code has nothing to do with booby traps, ya have to look at application.CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
Sec. 83.001. CIVIL IMMUNITY. A defendant who uses force or deadly force that is justified under Chapter 9, Penal Code, is immune from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from the defendant's use of force or deadly force, as applicable.
it certainly does apply it specifically applies as stated under chaper 9
from the prior post
PENAL CODE
Sec. 9.44. USE OF DEVICE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. The justification afforded by Sections 9.41 and 9.43
--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?Look at the first code you posted, the second would contradict the first.Now that code has nothing to do with booby traps, ya have to look at application.
it certainly does apply it specifically applies as stated under chaper 9
from the prior post
PENAL CODE
Sec. 9.44. USE OF DEVICE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. The justification afforded by Sections 9.41 and 9.43
--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?Look at the first code you posted, the second would contradict the first.it certainly does apply it specifically applies as stated under chaper 9
from the prior post
PENAL CODE
Sec. 9.44. USE OF DEVICE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. The justification afforded by Sections 9.41 and 9.43
--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
This is what a normal conversation is as opposed to Jimbowie's typical; "you're an idiot, your a moron, you're an asshole" (yes, at times......Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?Look at the first code you posted, the second would contradict the first.
--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
) idea of arguing........
Part of it is (I think) state statutes also where things like electrifying a booby trap is illegal no matter what. If I remember correctly it was illegal in the Commonwealth of Virginia possibly in other states, localities also.Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?Look at the first code you posted, the second would contradict the first.
--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
This is what a normal conversation is as opposed to Jimbowie's typical; "you're an idiot, your a moron, you're an asshole" (yes, at times......Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
Thanks!
Part of it is (I think) state statutes also where things like electrifying a booby trap is illegal no matter what. If I remember correctly it was illegal in the Commonwealth of Virginia possibly in other states, localities also.Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
Well it appears my initial concept of the law (application) was at least partially wrong, at least in a broad, overarching sense. Unlike some who walk on water and change water into wine I'm willing to admit I'm not infallible.Part of it is (I think) state statutes also where things like electrifying a booby trap is illegal no matter what. If I remember correctly it was illegal in the Commonwealth of Virginia possibly in other states, localities also.Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
there may be some local ordinances
A dog outside........ Plausible deniability.......This is what a normal conversation is as opposed to Jimbowie's typical; "you're an idiot, your a moron, you're an asshole" (yes, at times......Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
Thanks!
when i was much younger
there was someone that was constantly
stealing stuff out an old truck i was rebuilding
so i started letting joey my German Shepard
sleep in it at night after a couple of nights
joey was at the back door in the morning
and a nice tool bag laid along side the ol truck
was it a booby trap i dont know
did i have any more problems with parts disappearing
no not after that
--LOL
So now this homeowner could be charged with a federal offense? This should be good. What is it? What federal offense did I commit by giving a coworker the shits?Call bull shit all you want. Funny thing is I posted a legal US federal link...........I'm calling bullshit. What laws are you talking about?Loosing the debate? What debate, that there are laws against booby trapping property? Or do you somehow think I've been arguing for the protection of criminals all of this time? Honestly, is that what your muddled mind came up with?. Sounds like some is losing the debate, and that someone is you... lolNo shit Sherlock. Did you figure that out all on your own or did someone have to help you?Trying to steal someone's property is also illegal.
There was a time I worked at a call center and we had someone stealing the lunches of other employees. So I brought some Dominos Pizza for lunch and laced it thoroughly with a concentrated laxative a friend concocted at a lab. We found out very quickly who the thief was.
I technically booby trapped pizza. I just want to make sure there isn't a warrant out for my arrest.
Again, I'm not making any judgement nor am I advocating protecting the criminal but some of you moronic hacks seem to have it in your head that I am......... Stupid is as stupid does.
Do you always read into or is this a new thing for you? I never said you could be charged with a crime for what you did, I only posted what the link said. You decide it it applied to your situation or not.So now this homeowner could be charged with a federal offense? This should be good. What is it? What federal offense did I commit by giving a coworker the shits?Call bull shit all you want. Funny thing is I posted a legal US federal link...........I'm calling bullshit. What laws are you talking about?Loosing the debate? What debate, that there are laws against booby trapping property? Or do you somehow think I've been arguing for the protection of criminals all of this time? Honestly, is that what your muddled mind came up with?. Sounds like some is losing the debate, and that someone is you... lolNo shit Sherlock. Did you figure that out all on your own or did someone have to help you?
There was a time I worked at a call center and we had someone stealing the lunches of other employees. So I brought some Dominos Pizza for lunch and laced it thoroughly with a concentrated laxative a friend concocted at a lab. We found out very quickly who the thief was.
I technically booby trapped pizza. I just want to make sure there isn't a warrant out for my arrest.
Again, I'm not making any judgement nor am I advocating protecting the criminal but some of you moronic hacks seem to have it in your head that I am......... Stupid is as stupid does.
If it doesn't apply why did you post it? Don't you think Americans are criminalized enough as is without you trying to find creative ways to criminalize them further? Did it ever occur to you that this guy tresspassed and attempted to steal private property and maybe he deserved a little shock? Why would you try so hard to put someone defending their property in jail? Because he's a Trump supporter?Do you always read into or is this a new thing for you? I never said you could be charged with a crime for what you did, I only posted what the link said. You decide it it applied to your situation or not.So now this homeowner could be charged with a federal offense? This should be good. What is it? What federal offense did I commit by giving a coworker the shits?Call bull shit all you want. Funny thing is I posted a legal US federal link...........I'm calling bullshit. What laws are you talking about?Loosing the debate? What debate, that there are laws against booby trapping property? Or do you somehow think I've been arguing for the protection of criminals all of this time? Honestly, is that what your muddled mind came up with?. Sounds like some is losing the debate, and that someone is you... lol
There was a time I worked at a call center and we had someone stealing the lunches of other employees. So I brought some Dominos Pizza for lunch and laced it thoroughly with a concentrated laxative a friend concocted at a lab. We found out very quickly who the thief was.
I technically booby trapped pizza. I just want to make sure there isn't a warrant out for my arrest.
Again, I'm not making any judgement nor am I advocating protecting the criminal but some of you moronic hacks seem to have it in your head that I am......... Stupid is as stupid does.
Obviously you haven't been following the conversation over the last couple of pages between JON_BESERK and I.......... You should go back and read it. Also if you read what I posted instead of reading in I never advocated for the criminal, I simply posted a link to a law and you made an incorrect assumption........ That was pretty stupid of you......If it doesn't apply why did you post it? Don't you think Americans are criminalized enough as is without you trying to find creative ways to criminalize them further? Did it ever occur to you that this guy tresspassed and attempted to steal private property and maybe he deserved a little shock? Why would you try so hard to put someone defending their property in jail? Because he's a Trump supporter?Do you always read into or is this a new thing for you? I never said you could be charged with a crime for what you did, I only posted what the link said. You decide it it applied to your situation or not.So now this homeowner could be charged with a federal offense? This should be good. What is it? What federal offense did I commit by giving a coworker the shits?Call bull shit all you want. Funny thing is I posted a legal US federal link...........I'm calling bullshit. What laws are you talking about?Loosing the debate? What debate, that there are laws against booby trapping property? Or do you somehow think I've been arguing for the protection of criminals all of this time? Honestly, is that what your muddled mind came up with?
There was a time I worked at a call center and we had someone stealing the lunches of other employees. So I brought some Dominos Pizza for lunch and laced it thoroughly with a concentrated laxative a friend concocted at a lab. We found out very quickly who the thief was.
I technically booby trapped pizza. I just want to make sure there isn't a warrant out for my arrest.
Again, I'm not making any judgement nor am I advocating protecting the criminal but some of you moronic hacks seem to have it in your head that I am......... Stupid is as stupid does.
Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.
You were being an idiot and I was being honest, loser.This is what a normal conversation is as opposed to Jimbowie's typical; "you're an idiot, your a moron, you're an asshole" (yes, at times......Somehow I missed the justifiable part or misread it, it looked like a contradiction. Happens to the best of us. My bad.It doesn't? One says you can't, the other says you're immune....... Am I missing something somewhere?--LOL
no it doesnt
--LOL
in the penal code (the first one ) it say justification in other words under the set circumstances
it is legal
the second one civil code says you have immuity from a lawsuit if it was justifiable
there are examples that go over the line
like rigging a shotgun to go off
if someone tampers with a window for example
Thanks!
