Democrats pushing gun control and it has nothing to do with anything

Wolfstrike

Gold Member
Jan 12, 2012
2,237
433
160
Los Angeles
Every time there's a tragedy the democrat politicians pull their pre-written anti-gun speeches out of their pocket and start spouting their propaganda.

The Democrats are heavily influenced by Socialism, which is the largest mass-murdering form of government in human history, and we are going to listen to them give us pointers on peace?

The funny part is, they're not even making promises so stop massacres.

We should refer to the Second Amendment as to what it was intended for, the right of self defense.

We're supposed to hand over our gun rights (the right to self defense) and see how things pan out, and allow the government to pass more oppressing laws to deal with the future massacres in a non-gun society.

The statistics don't show an unarmed society solves anything.

The Democrats continue to repeat their ridiculous "solution" knowing a certain number of the population will grant them oppressive power.



This politician in England, Jo Cox thought she was going to have a nice successful career selling England down the tubes.

Guns are banned in England, did it stop her from being shot?

The assassin also stabbed her, should England have passed a knife ban?





Gun control won't even stop a mass murder.

For the last 20 years our government has been expecting a biological attack, how will a gun ban stop that?
 
Every time there's a tragedy the democrat politicians pull their pre-written anti-gun speeches out of their pocket and start spouting their propaganda.

The Democrats are heavily influenced by Socialism, which is the largest mass-murdering form of government in human history, and we are going to listen to them give us pointers on peace?

The funny part is, they're not even making promises so stop massacres.

We should refer to the Second Amendment as to what it was intended for, the right of self defense.

We're supposed to hand over our gun rights (the right to self defense) and see how things pan out, and allow the government to pass more oppressing laws to deal with the future massacres in a non-gun society.

The statistics don't show an unarmed society solves anything.

The Democrats continue to repeat their ridiculous "solution" knowing a certain number of the population will grant them oppressive power.



This politician in England, Jo Cox thought she was going to have a nice successful career selling England down the tubes.

Guns are banned in England, did it stop her from being shot?

The assassin also stabbed her, should England have passed a knife ban?


Don't laugh:

UK police behind effort to ban knives to end ‘knife violence’
 
Gun control is the Democrats' primary goal. They know they are stymied so long as millions of citizens are armed.
 
Every time there's a tragedy the democrat politicians pull their pre-written anti-gun speeches out of their pocket and start spouting their propaganda.

The Democrats are heavily influenced by Socialism, which is the largest mass-murdering form of government in human history, and we are going to listen to them give us pointers on peace?

The funny part is, they're not even making promises so stop massacres.

We should refer to the Second Amendment as to what it was intended for, the right of self defense.

We're supposed to hand over our gun rights (the right to self defense) and see how things pan out, and allow the government to pass more oppressing laws to deal with the future massacres in a non-gun society.

The statistics don't show an unarmed society solves anything.

The Democrats continue to repeat their ridiculous "solution" knowing a certain number of the population will grant them oppressive power.



This politician in England, Jo Cox thought she was going to have a nice successful career selling England down the tubes.

Guns are banned in England, did it stop her from being shot?

The assassin also stabbed her, should England have passed a knife ban?


Don't laugh:

UK police behind effort to ban knives to end ‘knife violence’

Too funny. Next will be "Save a Dork, Surrender Your Fork"
 
13417556_869900389782426_6566467287841985937_n.jpg
 
Too funny. Next will be "Save a Dork, Surrender Your Fork"

If it wasn't in print, I wouldn't have believed it myself.

That's the kind of society that liberals want to create here. They believe by disarming the public, the criminals will obey the laws and do the same. A murderer will not murder unless he has the convenience of a gun. They also believe that if they can get rid of guns, our suicide rate will drop because people so depressed about life won't look for alternatives to killing themselves.

Liberals don't mind guns really, they just hate the idea of people being able to defend themselves. When people are capable of defending themselves, they don't need government to do it for them. To a liberal, a citizen not needing government is like listening to cats sliding down a chalk board.
 
It's a damned shame that America has become accustomed to the murder of millions of babies each year, but get upset when people are killed in a bar. Where is the outrage for the babies?
 
The low information democratic party voter that parrots every incorrect thing about firearms believes that gun control actually works. The elite in that party knows better. For them its about disarming the law abiding citizens. .
 
The low information democratic party voter that parrots every incorrect thing about firearms believes that gun control actually works. The elite in that party knows better. For them its about disarming the law abiding citizens. .

The left doesn't care. It's NOT about gun control. It's about "people control". The left would love nothing more than to live under tyranny. Taking guns from the hands of patriots is just their first step.

As I stated earlier, if the left were truly concerned about "violence", they would have to come to terms with their willingness to allow the murder of millions of babies each year.

That will never happen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top