Did the election mandate that the House do as they are told by the Senate?

Did the election dictate the House do as told by the Senate?


  • Total voters
    13

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
May 6, 2007
56,047
18,142
Simple enough question. Obama claimed he would compromise with the House, meanwhile the Senate has stated they will do no such thing.
 
So Senators have the behaviour traits of a 14 year old ... yeah...tell us something we don't already know.
 
Simple enough question. Obama claimed he would compromise with the House, meanwhile the Senate has stated they will do no such thing.

Since fiscal initiatives are the job of the House, they'll have to go first and then we'll see. Whatever the Senate says doesn't relieve the House of their obligation. If they get to work on a deal, your point may be moot.
 
Sheesh. Everyone know that for the house, lobbyists trumps all.

The lobbyists can use the left over super pac money to lobby with.
Legal per law and tax codes.
 
Granny says, "Dat's right...

... `merica...

... love it or leave it."
:cool:
 
Did the election mandate that the House do as they are told by the Senate?

No, it was a mandate to do as they are told by the voters: stop the two years of obstruction and engage in responsible governance.
 
Getting less than 51% of the vote is hardly a mandate for anything. The republican road block was left in place for a reason.
 
Well, since the Senate is the primary reason nothing has gotten done in over a year I don't see why we should work with them at all.
 
The House should do what they think is right for America, it's up to the Senate and you know who to either cooperate or veto what is right for America.
 
Did the election "mandate" that the house do "as they are told" by the Senate?

No.

Did the election cause the Republican Party to lose a significant amount of political capital?

Yes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top