🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Did the Mayor of Baltimore Employ the Best Strategy for Handling the Riot?

Did the Mayor of Baltimore Employ the Best Strategy for Handling the Riot?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 9 100.0%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9

Publius1787

Gold Member
Jan 11, 2011
6,211
676
Did the Mayor of Baltimore Employ the Best Strategy for Handling the Riot?

If her (Stephanie Rawlings) strategy had a name it would be "Don't offend the rioters because they might riot more." It is obvious that she held the police back in an emasculated state, effectively handing the City of Baltimore over to the thugs. The police commissioner said the lack of police response was due to the fact that "they're still kids,' so the rights of others be damned I guess. URGENT - Baltimore Police Commissioner Defends Response National News - KHBS Home

Like Obama's foreign policy places the interests of our enemies over that of our nation's, the Mayor of Baltimore placed the interests of thugs over that of the peaceful citizens of Baltimore. The police sat there and watched as they burned, looted, and assaulted their way from block to block for malt liquor, cigarettes, cash registers, lottery tickets, and anything else they could get their hands on. Millions of dollars of property damage accumulated (The Senior Center was priced at $16,000,000 alone) as the police were castrated by the leftist idea that by pursuing the criminals they will only create more crime. 15 buildings were set on fire, 144 vehicles were destroyed; about 20 police officers were injured, 85,000 children are at home instead of school, and who knows how many buildings were looted or suffered damages. There were also a number of innocent civilians injured (Still counting) and one in particular who is in critical condition as she was nearly burned alive in her home. In the end the thugs were allowed to create more dollars worth of damage in a few short hours than was achieved in days in the 1999 WTO riots.

There was one thing remarkable about Baltimore. Black church/civil rights leaders, unlike the police, were free to move about as they pleased. They took to the streets singing songs and conveying a positive message for the young thugs to follow. Chances that helped? Zero! Young thugs ran around them looting and burning as the church/civil rights leaders looked foolish posing for media photo ops in the middle of the intersection. Indeed, instead of condemning the black thugs destroying the city they tried to plaster a positive propaganda image so as to give the thugs cover for their crimes. But there is little doubt that they will be hailed as hero's for accomplishing absolutely nothing.

All this rioting was made possible by the Baltimore Mayor who thought that the rights of her honest citizens were less than that of the thugs. After all, she did say that she respects their right to "protest;" without giving a moments notice to the rights of others to travel down a public street, sit safely at a local restaurant, or to enjoy a ball game they paid for. No, the rights of the citizens of Baltimore are subject to whatever street the thugs want to randomly travel down without so much as a permit. When it came between the honest citizen and the thug, the mayor let it be known clearly that she was worried for the thugs. The thugs knew that they had free reign and acted accordingly. The absence of police retaliation for criminal acts made that clear to the young thugs. The mayors statements made that clear to the young thugs. The fact that she waited a full 24 hours to impose a curfew after the damage was done made that clear to the young thugs. And when they found out that they could loot and burn whatever they wanted in full view of the cops, it became exceptionally clear to the young thugs. Perhaps the most clear of all the lessons learned is that Stephanie Rawlings is an incompetent Mayor.

When Baltimore turns into Detroit, we know we can thank the Democrats of Baltimore who were too fearful of hurting the feelings of the thugs they represent.
 
Last edited:
It really depends on what you mean by "strategy".

Oh her strategy was clear. It was "don't offend the thugs lest they get more angry and burn down more of the city." The idea is garbage. You may not be able to handle all of the riot but you at least try to get a grasp on part of it. Watching the cops sit there and do nothing was an embarrassment and the people of Baltimore deserve better.
 
It really depends on what you mean by "strategy".

Oh her strategy was clear. It was "don't offend the thugs lest they get more angry and burn down more of the city." The idea is garbage. You may not be able to handle all of the riot but you at least try to get a grasp on part of it. Watching the cops sit there and do nothing was an embarrassment and the people of Baltimore deserve better.

Let me clarify.

What do you mean when you say "strategy"? Are you talking about her plan to get re-elected?
 
It really depends on what you mean by "strategy".

Oh her strategy was clear. It was "don't offend the thugs lest they get more angry and burn down more of the city." The idea is garbage. You may not be able to handle all of the riot but you at least try to get a grasp on part of it. Watching the cops sit there and do nothing was an embarrassment and the people of Baltimore deserve better.

Let me clarify.

What do you mean when you say "strategy"? Are you talking about her plan to get re-elected?
Her stupidity did nothing to limit the rioting OR get relected. Silly question.
 
The rioters should have been >>

1. arrested

2. had the shit kicked out of them

When we protested against the Vietnam War, Washington DC cops (black & white both) kicked ass. They cracked heads and busted legs with their billy clubs. When the National Guard was there, they had fixed bayonets on their rifles, and steel-tipped boots. If that was the case in Baltimore, there wouldn't have been looting, arson or rock-throwing.

The mayor got it WRONG. She thought tough tactics by police and the Guard would "escalate" the rioting. It was just the opposite. It was her weak, hands-off tactic that escalated it.
 
It really depends on what you mean by "strategy".

Oh her strategy was clear. It was "don't offend the thugs lest they get more angry and burn down more of the city." The idea is garbage. You may not be able to handle all of the riot but you at least try to get a grasp on part of it. Watching the cops sit there and do nothing was an embarrassment and the people of Baltimore deserve better.

Let me clarify.

What do you mean when you say "strategy"? Are you talking about her plan to get re-elected?

What do you think of her "strategy" to handle the lawless "thugs" who looted and burned buildings?
 
It depends on what her goals were. If it was to get black people as much free stuff as they could carry her strategy worked exceedingly well.
 
Every Democrat run city in the country should have a few of these for the inevitable riots that ensue when their feel good liberal policies fail....

Incredibly effective and non-lethal.

water-cannon_1848171i.jpg
wc.jpg
web-turkey-epa.jpg
 
I believe her chance of being re-elected is gone.
I believe her chance of being re-elected is gone.

Marion Berry (Smoked Crack with some hookers and got caught on video) (Reelected)
William Jefferson (Found with $90,000 in his freezer) Re-elected
Charlie Rangel (Cheated on his Taxes) Re-elected over and over
Kwame Kilpatrick (Re-elected after the public was aware of all his corruption and racketeering charges)
Maxine Waters (Funneled Stimulus money into her husbands bank) (Re-elected)
Monica Conyers (Re-elected despite her racketeering/corruption charges)
Jessie Jackson Jr. (Kept getting re-elected until he went to jail)

Since when has majority black democrat districts ever held their corrupt and incompetent politicians to account for their actions? They like their politicians corrupt and incompetent. They will defend a black politician no matter how guilty they obviously are just like they will defend a black thug resisting arrest and assaulting cops no matter how obviously guilty he was (See Mike Brown/Trayvon Martin).
 
It depends on what her goals were. If it was to get black people as much free stuff as they could carry her strategy worked exceedingly well.

And she likewise sent the message that they can get away with anything they want. Ladies and gentlemen I give you the politics of 63.7% black Baltimore. You can bet your ass that by the next census it will be over 70%. Then it will slowly degrade into Detroit.

More recently she apologized to the thugs for calling them "thugs." They know with her in office they can get whatever they want. Why boot her out?
 
Last edited:
I believe her chance of being re-elected is gone.
I believe her chance of being re-elected is gone.

Marion Berry (Smoked Crack with some hookers and got caught on video) (Reelected)
William Jefferson (Found with $90,000 in his freezer) Re-elected
Charlie Rangel (Cheated on his Taxes) Re-elected over and over
Kwame Kilpatrick (Re-elected after the public was aware of all his corruption and racketeering charges)
Maxine Waters (Funneled Stimulus money into her husbands bank) (Re-elected)
Monica Conyers (Re-elected despite her racketeering/corruption charges)
Jessie Jackson Jr. (Kept getting re-elected until he went to jail)

Since when has majority black democrat districts ever held their corrupt and incompetent politicians to account for their actions? They like their politicians corrupt and incompetent. They will defend a black politician no matter how guilty they obviously are just like they will defend a black thug resisting arrest and assaulting cops no matter how obviously guilty he was (See Mike Brown/Trayvon Martin).

I stand corrected. Thank you. Let me rephrase that. Her chances of re-election should be gone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top