America’s Industrious Spirit Is Gone: It Could Take Longer to Rebuild the Baltimore Bridge Than It Took to Build the Entire Transcontinental Railroad

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,218
34,587
2,290
As I posted a week or so ago, unless Biden gets off his ass and waives the environmental BS, this will be a nightmare.

Let me remind people of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis in 2007 and how a completely new bridge opened with a year. Because environmental rules were waived by the Feds and Minnesota, and the contractors weer given basically carte blanche to do what was needed.



The effort to rebuild the recently collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore, Maryland, could quickly turn into a years-long quagmire as a result of environmental red tape under the Biden administration, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The Baltimore Bridge was struck by a container ship navigating the Patapsco River out of the Port of Baltimore in late March, sending several cars and workers into the water and rendering the passageway unusable. It is unknown exactly how long the bridge could take to rebuild, as officials could expedite the process, but experts warned the DCNF that government red tape, such as environmental reviews filed by government entities or environmental activists, could slow down its construction after debris is cleared from the site and new plans for a replacement bridge are drawn up.

...

“Federal and state regulations, including in Maryland, give NIMBYs and environmentalists a lot of ways to block projects,” Young told the DCNF. “Hopefully the Key Bridge’s high visibility will help them restrain their worst anti-development impulses, but that is no guarantee.”

Many large infrastructure projects are often bogged down by environmental reviews, such as California’s high-speed rail project, which has spent more than $600 million on environmental reviews since it was approved by voters more than 15 years ago.

“My fear here is that people can generate environmental reviews that they flag concerns for, say the oyster population or if there’s a bird that breeds in the Patapsco River or water quality,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “All these things could easily be triggered through a federal review process and would drag on. Those reviews are not always efficient. The efficacy of those is to be determined by others, but they’re certainly not expedited.”

The Biden administration has expanded the national environmental review framework, rolling back changes that the Trump administration made to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires federal agencies to review the environmental impacts of projects before approval. If the federal government remains involved in the project, environmental reviews may bog down the process, as the average NEPA environmental impact statement between 2010 and 2018 took 4.5 years to complete, halting construction completely, according to the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality.

...

“I fear that the cost of regulations is going to be more impactful than people are giving it credit for,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “Depending on what design they go with, like what birds fly in the area or what fish are in the Patapsco River, the cost of studying that and mitigating the negative impacts would be a problem. The mitigation measures to make the bridge more resilient and safe are going to be an added cost. But that’s an added cost not captured by inflation for any bridge built today.”

The Maryland Governor’s Office deferred the DCNF to statements made in previous press conferences. The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment.



 
As I posted a week or so ago, unless Biden gets off his ass and waives the environmental BS, this will be a nightmare.

Let me remind people of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis in 2007 and how a completely new bridge opened with a year. Because environmental rules were waived by the Feds and Minnesota, and the contractors weer given basically carte blanche to do what was needed.


The effort to rebuild the recently collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore, Maryland, could quickly turn into a years-long quagmire as a result of environmental red tape under the Biden administration, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The Baltimore Bridge was struck by a container ship navigating the Patapsco River out of the Port of Baltimore in late March, sending several cars and workers into the water and rendering the passageway unusable. It is unknown exactly how long the bridge could take to rebuild, as officials could expedite the process, but experts warned the DCNF that government red tape, such as environmental reviews filed by government entities or environmental activists, could slow down its construction after debris is cleared from the site and new plans for a replacement bridge are drawn up.
...
“Federal and state regulations, including in Maryland, give NIMBYs and environmentalists a lot of ways to block projects,” Young told the DCNF. “Hopefully the Key Bridge’s high visibility will help them restrain their worst anti-development impulses, but that is no guarantee.”
Many large infrastructure projects are often bogged down by environmental reviews, such as California’s high-speed rail project, which has spent more than $600 million on environmental reviews since it was approved by voters more than 15 years ago.
“My fear here is that people can generate environmental reviews that they flag concerns for, say the oyster population or if there’s a bird that breeds in the Patapsco River or water quality,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “All these things could easily be triggered through a federal review process and would drag on. Those reviews are not always efficient. The efficacy of those is to be determined by others, but they’re certainly not expedited.”
The Biden administration has expanded the national environmental review framework, rolling back changes that the Trump administration made to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires federal agencies to review the environmental impacts of projects before approval. If the federal government remains involved in the project, environmental reviews may bog down the process, as the average NEPA environmental impact statement between 2010 and 2018 took 4.5 years to complete, halting construction completely, according to the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality.
...
“I fear that the cost of regulations is going to be more impactful than people are giving it credit for,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “Depending on what design they go with, like what birds fly in the area or what fish are in the Patapsco River, the cost of studying that and mitigating the negative impacts would be a problem. The mitigation measures to make the bridge more resilient and safe are going to be an added cost. But that’s an added cost not captured by inflation for any bridge built today.”
The Maryland Governor’s Office deferred the DCNF to statements made in previous press conferences. The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment.



So another Daily Caller pile of crap.
 
Because environmental rules were waived by the Feds and Minnesota, and the contractors weer given basically carte blanche to do what was needed.
There were a couple of projects in CA about 15 years ago, if my memory serves, that showed how far gov't will go to make things work. One was a section of I-5 through Sacramento that needed to be expedited. An offer was made with incentives to get the job done quickly. The job was done in no time and the incentives were paid. Normally, it would have stretched out while the contractor worked the "cost, plus" angle. The other project was the new Bay Bridge in SF/Oakland. That was completed in short order as well, but it turns out they used Chinese bolts (in violation of the contract), that failed miserably and had to be replaced. Even with that, the project was completed in short order. Incentives work.
 
We have pfas, forever chemicals, in our well water. It's the next oncoming environmental issue. Towns and cities are going to be fighting the battle.
 
I'll wait and see...big opportunity for them to show some real leadership......probably will cost them big if they fumble around.
 
I'll wait and see...big opportunity for them to show some real leadership......probably will cost them big if they fumble around.
It's already costing them, I read yesterday where the Port of Virginia is easily handling the increased volume of shipping that would have been bound for Baltimore.

Decades of foresight enable Va. to process cargo diverted from Maryland after bridge collapse.​



Thanks for the revenue windfall MD. ;)
 
You may be declining but we have it far, far worse. Always have thanks to our unaccountable system that manufactures threats and stifles talent.

Canadians don't invent, nor have a booming manufacturing base.
 
As I posted a week or so ago, unless Biden gets off his ass and waives the environmental BS, this will be a nightmare.

Let me remind people of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis in 2007 and how a completely new bridge opened with a year. Because environmental rules were waived by the Feds and Minnesota, and the contractors weer given basically carte blanche to do what was needed.


The effort to rebuild the recently collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore, Maryland, could quickly turn into a years-long quagmire as a result of environmental red tape under the Biden administration, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The Baltimore Bridge was struck by a container ship navigating the Patapsco River out of the Port of Baltimore in late March, sending several cars and workers into the water and rendering the passageway unusable. It is unknown exactly how long the bridge could take to rebuild, as officials could expedite the process, but experts warned the DCNF that government red tape, such as environmental reviews filed by government entities or environmental activists, could slow down its construction after debris is cleared from the site and new plans for a replacement bridge are drawn up.
...
“Federal and state regulations, including in Maryland, give NIMBYs and environmentalists a lot of ways to block projects,” Young told the DCNF. “Hopefully the Key Bridge’s high visibility will help them restrain their worst anti-development impulses, but that is no guarantee.”
Many large infrastructure projects are often bogged down by environmental reviews, such as California’s high-speed rail project, which has spent more than $600 million on environmental reviews since it was approved by voters more than 15 years ago.
“My fear here is that people can generate environmental reviews that they flag concerns for, say the oyster population or if there’s a bird that breeds in the Patapsco River or water quality,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “All these things could easily be triggered through a federal review process and would drag on. Those reviews are not always efficient. The efficacy of those is to be determined by others, but they’re certainly not expedited.”
The Biden administration has expanded the national environmental review framework, rolling back changes that the Trump administration made to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires federal agencies to review the environmental impacts of projects before approval. If the federal government remains involved in the project, environmental reviews may bog down the process, as the average NEPA environmental impact statement between 2010 and 2018 took 4.5 years to complete, halting construction completely, according to the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality.
...
“I fear that the cost of regulations is going to be more impactful than people are giving it credit for,” Cavanaugh told the DCNF. “Depending on what design they go with, like what birds fly in the area or what fish are in the Patapsco River, the cost of studying that and mitigating the negative impacts would be a problem. The mitigation measures to make the bridge more resilient and safe are going to be an added cost. But that’s an added cost not captured by inflation for any bridge built today.”
The Maryland Governor’s Office deferred the DCNF to statements made in previous press conferences. The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment.



People in the USA can stop or slow way down virtually any construction job or force it to take drastic steps to build a bridge.
It does not take a person from Maryland to put the brakes on that bridge. It can be a party thousands of miles due to the use of the bridge by all states in effect.

Biden should work to fix it. But it is very doubtful he will do more than talk about it.
 
93 days!
1712269520293.jpeg
 
People in the USA can stop or slow way down virtually any construction job or force it to take drastic steps to build a bridge.
It does not take a person from Maryland to put the brakes on that bridge. It can be a party thousands of miles due to the use of the bridge by all states in effect.

Biden should work to fix it. But it is very doubtful he will do more than talk about it.
I'm guessing that they will go gangbusters to clear the channel but slow to replace the bridge to placate the greenies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top