Biden plans to undermine the Supreme Court.

[Billiejeens]

Because for over fifty years the SCOTUS gave that decision to the women involved and not the government

So?

 

[Lesh]

So?

YOU. Want to government involved

Here… and nowhere else
You’re a zealot… and a drunk

 

[Billiejeens]

YOU. Want to government involved

Here… and nowhere else
You’re a zealot… and a drunk

I never drink
It's bad for one's health.

The Government got involved when they made up a right that had never before existed.

 

[Lesh]

I never drink
It's bad for one's health.

The Government got involved when they made up a right that had never before existed.

And yet oddly you want the government involved to prevent abortions

Hmmm

 

[Billiejeens]

And yet oddly you want the government involved to prevent abortions

Hmmm

You wanted the Government to legalize murder.

 

[Lesh]

You wanted the Government to legalize murder.

I want the government to stay the fuck out of it

 

[BluesLegend]

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court

Then the fool woke up from his left wing dream and remembered, 3 EQUAL and separate branches of government. He can't do jack shit.

 

[otto105]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

Yeah, by asking for ethics and accountability.

Scary shit man

 

[Billiejeens]

I want the government to stay the fuck out of it

You don't.

Before Roe, poice would arrest someone who killed their baby.

You applauded the federal government using its power to keep law enforcement from doing its job.

 

[Lesh]

You don't.

Before Roe, poice would arrest someone who killed their baby.

You applauded the federal government using its power to keep law enforcement from doing its job.

“Poice”

Yeah

You don’t drink

 

[Billiejeens]

“Poice”

Yeah

You don’t drink

That's your best response?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

And yet oddly you want the government involved to prevent abortions

Hmmm

Isn’t that murder? Shouldn’t the government be in the business of protecting the lives of it’s citizens?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

“Poice”

Yeah

You don’t drink

Oh man, a typo. You got him now.

 

[otto105]

Isn’t that murder? Shouldn’t the government be in the business of protecting the lives of it’s citizens?

Is a zygote a citizen?

 

[OKTexas]

I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.

First, term limits on the court would require a constitutional amendment, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!

Second, congress has no authority to impose any rules on the other co-equal branches of government. Jus like the executive and SCOTUS can't impose rules on congress.

Third, under our current Constitution, the only way to remove a justice or any other federal judge for that matter is impeachment. How would you think that would work out?

.

 

[ozro]

First, term limits on the court would require a constitutional amendment, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!

Second, congress has no authority to impose any rules on the other co-equal branches of government. Jus like the executive and SCOTUS can't impose rules on congress.

Third, under our current Constitution, the only way to remove a justice or any other federal judge for that matter is impeachment. How would you think that would work out?

.

But but but super senile Joe and his staff will do it with a pen and a phone.
Blood and ashes in the streets will soon follow

 

[candycorn]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

Not sure what an "endorsement" from the President would mean.

Just leave it alone, Joe.

 

[OKTexas]

And? These are all common sense suggestions. There should be no lifetime tenure on the SC (15-20 years max) and there should be an ethics code. As well as a morality code for nominees.
Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women was made public. Alito and Thomas should both be shown the door
for their ethics violations.

None of this is "undermining" the institution.

See Article 5 of the Constitution.

.

 

[OKTexas]

What's wrong with term limits and a code of ethics for justices?

Virtually all other national Supreme Courts have some sort of term limits on those serving on the court.

And why is a code of ethics bad? I have a code of ethics at work that if I don't abide by, I can get fired. And my job isn't near as important as a SCOTUS justice. Do you think that justices should be able to act unethically?

Impeachment is the method the Constitution prescribes to remove any federal judge. And constitutionally it's up to SCOTUS to establish their own rules, just like congress and the executive branch. Kind of like a co-worker can't tell you what to do unless the company rules give them that authority.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Other legislative and executive ways to make it happen.

No there's not, what do you fail to understand about 3 CO-EQUAL branches of government?

.