DNC Lawsuit, cheered by USMB conservatives, is dismissed

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

 

[easyt65]

Then, when you realize that she is never going to be charged, tell us how you were not even interested at all.

Only snowflakes are interested in bragging about how Leftist criminals are protected from / allowed to get away with violating both Constitution and Law, interested in justifying their criminal acts with such stupid declarations as, "We had to engage in violence to protect non-violence", as the Left's violent Fascist antifa leader recently declared.

 

[easyt65]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

Again, it was INTERNAL DNC fecal matter flinging that had nothing to do with anyone outside the DNC.

Bwuhahaha.....

 

[Ted Frazier]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

That's a strawman. I never claimed that the lawsuit was filed by a conservative.
Conservatives in this thread were excited about Bernie people and Democrats going at it. Remember, during the Democratic primaries conservatives favored Bernie over Hillary.

Do you want me to show you the links to the threats started by conservatives again?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

That's a strawman. I never claimed that the lawsuit was filed by a conservative.
Conservatives in this thread were excited about Bernie people and Democrats going at it. Remember, during the Democratic primaries conservatives favored Bernie over Hillary.

Do you want me to show you the links to the threats started by conservatives again?

Post away little one. I don't give a rat's ass what SOMEONE ELSE said. When you address me you may use my words against me not the words of random strangers on the internet.

 

[Ted Frazier]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

Again, it was INTERNAL DNC fecal matter flinging that had nothing to do with anyone outside the DNC.

Bwuhahaha.....

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

 

[easyt65]

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

I answered that already:

'Slow News Day / Days'.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

Again, it was INTERNAL DNC fecal matter flinging that had nothing to do with anyone outside the DNC.

Bwuhahaha.....

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

I'm not ignoring it. I simply don't care.

Someday when they find a cure for your down syndrome you'll realize that the only words or opinions that matter are the ones formed in your own head.
Until then I guess you'll have to continue relying on others to find your purpose in life.

 

[Ted Frazier]

I am a Conservative, and I don't see this as an event which justifies crowing by half-wits* for any reason---particularly as a taunt to Conservatives.

It was a battle between "Out-in-the-Open Socialists" and "Socialists still masquerading as Democrats".

__________
*You seem to think DebbieWasserman-Shultz is now smelling like a Rose to Socialists and Demo-Socialists alike...which I think justifies the reference to "half-wit".

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

Again, it was INTERNAL DNC fecal matter flinging that had nothing to do with anyone outside the DNC.

Bwuhahaha.....

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

I'm not ignoring it. I simply don't care.

Someday when they find a cure for your down syndrome you'll realize that the only words or opinions that matter are the ones formed in your own head.
Until then I guess you'll have to continue relying on others to find your purpose in life.

Save that face Grampa. Save it!


save face

1. 1.
   retain respect; avoid humiliation.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

After posting tons of threads on the lawsuit, conservatives go "meh", because they lost. Predictable.

We didn't lose anything. The lawsuit was not filed by a conservative. And just to clarify we still win because that bitches political ambitions are now in a trash bin

Again, it was INTERNAL DNC fecal matter flinging that had nothing to do with anyone outside the DNC.

Bwuhahaha.....

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

I'm not ignoring it. I simply don't care.

Someday when they find a cure for your down syndrome you'll realize that the only words or opinions that matter are the ones formed in your own head.
Until then I guess you'll have to continue relying on others to find your purpose in life.

Save that face Grampa. Save it!


save face

1. 1.
   retain respect; avoid humiliation.

A skill beyond your ability

 

[washamericom]

Have you noticed that message board people post tons of threads announcing lawsuits against people they don't like... But if the verdict doesn't fit their narrative they don't even report it?

Well, it has been days since the fraud lawsuit against DNC leader Debbie Wasserman filed by a kooky Bernie supporter was dismissed.

Conservatives here are quiet. All you hear is crickets.

Now go do a search on "dnc Lawsuit" and you'll see how interested and excited they were before the verdict.

Losers are invited to come out of hiding in this thread.
Feel free to accuse Debbie Wasserman of yet another crime she will never be indicted or convicted for, if it makes you feel better.



Florida judge dismisses fraud lawsuit against DNC

she fell from grace. not sure what you are celebrating. she was eying the whitehouse.

Now you're pretending she was "eyeing the White House". LOL. She wasn't. Link? Gateway Pundit links don't count as links, by the way..

who decides which links or statues are permissible ?
debbie's running for higher office was no secret. sorry to bum out your thread.

No. Debbie wasn't looking to run for President. Show links instead of repeating your bullshit.

it's first hand amigo. sorry. but they all talked about it. maybe you can corner one of the interns to tell you. they said she is more prepared to be president than anyone we know.

maybe call her yourself, she still has an office... somewhere.

but she won't be running, too bad, she an pocahontas would have made a formidible team.

and yes, bernie got slighted, by a secret conspiracy.

The DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz insult Bernie and 12 million ...
www.foxnews.com/.../dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schultz-insult-bernie-and-12-million-...
Jul 25, 2016 - The DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz insult Bernie and 12 ... “He isn't going to bepresident,” Wasserman Schultz proclaimed in one email ...

 

[Seawytch]

I'm not sure it's something to cheer about from either side.

First, the DNC argument before the court was that the Democratic National Committee did not have to have an open, fair, or Democratic process to choose their nominee. The argument that the Court had no authority to enforce the DNC Charter was victorious, but really, do you want to win that argument?

DNC Lawyers Argue DNC Has Right to Pick Candidates in Back Rooms

The full transcript is interesting. The DNC lawyers argued that they have a first amendment right to deceive you the supporters into believing you have a voice in the process of picking a nominee.

So yes, cheer the victory, the Bernie folks were shot down, and they're going to run right out and back the Democratic Party now aren't they? Well not so far they aren't. Fundraising numbers for the DNC is down big time.

This is actually the crux of the Democratic Party's problem. you think that anyone who doesn't agree with the Republicans is automatically a supporter of the Democrats. Not so far they aren't.

Yes. Everybody has always known that the DNC has always had the right to chose any candidate they wanted. It's exactly the same as the RNC in that way. Neither party is obligated to do anything they don't want to do. The RNC could have given the nomination to ANYONE. They weren't obligated to give it to Trump.

And aside from that, no properly registered voter was denied the right to vote for Sanders.

 

[washamericom]

No. Debbie wasn't looking to run for President. Show links instead of repeating your bullshit.

Debbie was a treasonous toady who returned to her mistress after being fired for her betrayal and espionage.

You guys should start threads about how Debbie will in your opinion be charged with treason and Espionage. LOL.

Then, when you realize that she is never going to be charged, tell us how you were not even interested at all.

why don't you just start a new thread that works instead of defending this one ?

 

[busybee01]

I'm not sure it's something to cheer about from either side.

First, the DNC argument before the court was that the Democratic National Committee did not have to have an open, fair, or Democratic process to choose their nominee. The argument that the Court had no authority to enforce the DNC Charter was victorious, but really, do you want to win that argument?

DNC Lawyers Argue DNC Has Right to Pick Candidates in Back Rooms

The full transcript is interesting. The DNC lawyers argued that they have a first amendment right to deceive you the supporters into believing you have a voice in the process of picking a nominee.

So yes, cheer the victory, the Bernie folks were shot down, and they're going to run right out and back the Democratic Party now aren't they? Well not so far they aren't. Fundraising numbers for the DNC is down big time.

This is actually the crux of the Democratic Party's problem. you think that anyone who doesn't agree with the Republicans is automatically a supporter of the Democrats. Not so far they aren't.

Clinton got 55% of the vote and Sanders got 43%. Why shouldn't Clinton have won the nomination?

 

[Seawytch]

you continue to ignore the question of why conservatives posted multiple threads rooting for the far-left plaintiffs. don't pretend not to be sad.

I answered that already:

'Slow News Day / Days'.

Oh please. There hasn't been a slow news day since Twitler took office.

 

[LaDexter]

Feel free to accuse Debbie Wasserman of yet another crime she will never be indicted or convicted for, if it makes you feel better.

LOL!!!

DWS rigged the Iowa Caucus so that Bernie, who got more votes.... lost.

DWS doesn't care one bit about the US. She cares about ISRAEL... and needed a "US President" who would continue to cover up the truth about Israel... and when the task is covering up and pocketing bribes to do so, nobody was ever "more qualified" than Hitlery...

 

[busybee01]

I'm not sure it's something to cheer about from either side.

First, the DNC argument before the court was that the Democratic National Committee did not have to have an open, fair, or Democratic process to choose their nominee. The argument that the Court had no authority to enforce the DNC Charter was victorious, but really, do you want to win that argument?

DNC Lawyers Argue DNC Has Right to Pick Candidates in Back Rooms

The full transcript is interesting. The DNC lawyers argued that they have a first amendment right to deceive you the supporters into believing you have a voice in the process of picking a nominee.

So yes, cheer the victory, the Bernie folks were shot down, and they're going to run right out and back the Democratic Party now aren't they? Well not so far they aren't. Fundraising numbers for the DNC is down big time.

This is actually the crux of the Democratic Party's problem. you think that anyone who doesn't agree with the Republicans is automatically a supporter of the Democrats. Not so far they aren't.

Yes. Everybody has always known that the DNC has always had the right to chose any candidate they wanted. It's exactly the same as the RNC in that way. Neither party is obligated to do anything they don't want to do. The RNC could have given the nomination to ANYONE. They weren't obligated to give it to Trump.

Yeah, when trying to defend something, don't insist that everyone else could do it.

The RNC did not want Trump. A large number of Republicn officials, elected and part of the Party establishment still don't want Trump. The RNC started the Opposition Research when it was painfully obvious that Trump was winning. They ended that research when Trump was the nominee chosen by the voters in the process. In other words the Republicans let the voters choose the nominee that everyone thought was going to lose.

The Democratic National Commitee decided to trick the voters, trick the supporters into thinking it was a fair and open process. It was grass roots baby. Trust us. When that became apparent that it wasn't, the Democratic Party shrugged and said you were the fools for thinking it was going to be open, and actually allow the voters to pick the candidate.
Sahnders shoud get the
Now, let me tell you how it affected me, a person who voted Democratic my entire life. First, I swore I would not vote for Hillary about the day before she declared her nomination. I knew too much about her and her scheming to give her my vote. But I was still willing to vote for other Democrats. In fact, that was my original plan. Vote against Hillary and see if I could help get some Democrats onto the Local, State, and Statewide offices. Not to mention the House and Senate.

Over time, that changed. That changed when it became apparent that the Democratic National Committee was not playing fair. Hillary would have probably won the nomination anyway, the DNC was not taking any chances. They manipulated everything to make sure that Bernie lost. Bernie was supposed to be like Trump the joke candidate. Only the people were not laughing. They liked what Bernie had to say, and a lot liked what Trump had to say.

So about that time I decided to withhold my vote from any Democrat. I decided if the party was that corrupt, they did not deserve my vote. I had voted in every election since 1988, and I had voted Democratic every single time since that first election. Now, I was walking away from the party that I had supported my entire life. Not because I liked what the Republicans were. I think that Trump is wrong on a number of issues. But because I could at least say that Trump won fair and square.

The Democratic Party ran a sideshow pretending to be the party of the people. The Republicans accepted a terrible candidate because that's what the people wanted. The Democrats foisted a terrible candidate on the people pretending that she was their choice.

The Curtain fell, the Wizard was exposed. Then the emails were released, and that confirmed my belief, and my decision. The Democratic Party is free to pick anyone they want. I am free to vote against them in every election to come. I will, until they live up to their own charter, and actually become the party of the people they used to be.

Clinton got 55% of the primary vote compared to 43% for Sanders. You are seriously suggesting that Sanders should have gotten the nomination even though he lost the popular vote. That would be foisting someone on the Democrats. You come across as a sore loser.

 

[LaDexter]

Clinton got 55% of the primary vote compared to 43% for Sanders.

Bernie should have been 2-0, and instead was 1-1 because DWS rigged the Iowa caucus to bypass the popular vote and bow to Israel's wish that Hillary win...

 

[koshergrl]

Have you noticed that message board people post tons of threads announcing lawsuits against people they don't like... But if the verdict doesn't fit their narrative they don't even report it?

Well, it has been days since the fraud lawsuit against DNC leader Debbie Wasserman filed by a kooky Bernie supporter was dismissed.

Conservatives here are quiet. All you hear is crickets.

Now go do a search on "dnc Lawsuit" and you'll see how interested and excited they were before the verdict.

Losers are invited to come out of hiding in this thread.
Feel free to accuse Debbie Wasserman of yet another crime she will never be indicted or convicted for, if it makes you feel better.



Florida judge dismisses fraud lawsuit against DNC

We don't need the lawsuit, she's going to be relaxing in the pokey before too long.

 

[busybee01]

Feel free to accuse Debbie Wasserman of yet another crime she will never be indicted or convicted for, if it makes you feel better.

LOL!!!

DWS rigged the Iowa Caucus so that Bernie, who got more votes.... lost.

DWS doesn't care one bit about the US. She cares about ISRAEL... and needed a "US President" who would continue to cover up the truth about Israel... and when the task is covering up and pocketing bribes to do so, nobody was ever "more qualified" than Hitlery...

Clinton got 55% of the primary vote compared to 43% for Sanders.

Bernie should have been 2-0, and instead was 1-1 because DWS rigged the Iowa caucus to bypass the popular vote and bow to Israel's wish that Hillary win...

Clinton had a firewall. In the South, Sanders had no support. Clinton got around 75% of the vote in South Carolina, 65% in Texas and Florida, 89% in Louisiana and Mississippi. Iowa was meaningless. Even if Sanders had won Iowa, he still would have lost the nomination. Reagan lost the first 5 or so contests against Ford and still nearly won.