Do not fall for people who CLAIM TO BE LIBERTARIAN, only to censor speech more than anyone else

and as I explained then

we are a republic not a democracy,,

and because we are anyone can contest the election all they want,,

get over it,,
I'm done with your idiotic persistent denial we are a democracy. You are a parroting idiot.

And as I already told you, Trump contested in court, as he had every right to.

But when he failed, he DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO OVERTHROW OUR DEMOCRACY.

Get over it,.

I am done with you. You clearly think repetition makes your lies and cult beliefs true.
 
I'm done with your idiotic persistent denial we are a democracy. You are a parroting idiot.

And as I already told you, Trump contested in court, as he had every right to.

But when he failed, he DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO OVERTHROW OUR DEMOCRACY.

Get over it,.

I am done with you. You clearly think repetition makes your lies and cult beliefs true.
The whole democracy vs republic thing is one of those dumb arguments where people choose to argue over definitions rather than address the real issue. When people say we're a republic, not a democracy, they're usually responding to people who seem to think that, because we are a democracy, anything goes as long as its backed by majority rule.

It's far more important, in my view, that everyone can agree that our government is limited by a constitution that carefully enumerates the extent of the state's power. That's far more important than whether decisions are made by majority rule or executive fiat.
 
Last edited:
I'm done with your idiotic persistent denial we are a democracy. You are a parroting idiot.

And as I already told you, Trump contested in court, as he had every right to.

But when he failed, he DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO OVERTHROW OUR DEMOCRACY.

Get over it,.

I am done with you. You clearly think repetition makes your lies and cult beliefs true.
we are a republic,,

I know this because our CONSTITUTION says we are,,

no one tried to overthrow the government,,

stop following your leftist talking points and think for yourself,,
 
unless the majority of the people stand and fight,,

in fact as long as one person stands and fights we still have a republic,,

do you stand with those people??
So you sound like you're one person, and we still have an oligarchy. The fact is that the majority of the people can't agree on basic facts, so the idea that the majority of the people are going to stand and fight for the Constitution, when they can't even agree about what it says, is nonsense. The United States has become too big and too ideologically diverse to function.
 
So you sound like you're one person, and we still have an oligarchy. The fact is that the majority of the people can't agree on basic facts, so the idea that the majority of the people are going to stand and fight for the Constitution, when they can't even agree about what it says, is nonsense. The United States has become too big and too ideologically diverse to function.
it says what it says,,
and written in simple english so anyone that trys to interpret it should be hit with a shovel,,

so again,,

do you stand with us or not??
 
it says what it says,,
and written in simple english so anyone that trys to interpret it should be hit with a shovel,,

so again,,

do you stand with us or not??
I don't know who "us" is, so, reflexively, no, I don't "stand" with you. While I think going back to the explicit meaning of the Constitution would be a step in the right direction, I would also want to limit the federal government much more than the Constitution does. I think we should go back to the Articles of Confederation at a minimum, frankly. But one is as likely as the other, which is to say not at all.
 
I don't know who "us" is, so, reflexively, no, I don't "stand" with you. While I think going back to the explicit meaning of the Constitution would be a step in the right direction, I would also want to limit the federal government much more than the Constitution does. I think we should go back to the Articles of Confederation at a minimum, frankly. But one is as likely as the other, which is to say not at all.
sounds like youre content with the oligarchy,,
 
I'm not a Libertarian but I voted for the LP candidate in 2020. I even started a topic saying I was before the election.

In ten years, you will have a hard time finding anyone to admit they voted for Trump.

I voted for Trump in 2016 and will again this Sunday. It's Democrats who won't admit to voting for Kamala
 
See? We can't even agree on what words mean.
you may want to read up on why the articles of confederation failed,,

if we were still under it we wouldnt exist and what would exist would look worse than pre-EU europe,,

not going to say progressives havent damaged the constitution since 1900 and that damage needs repaired,,

but under what has survived of the original intent of the constitution is the only reason we have it better than every other country on the planet,,

I chose to stand with others and preserve what we have and fight to repair the damage thats been done,,
 
Mostly it's democrats who are so disenchanted with their party and their candidate that they whine about a 3rd party. Libertarian is a bona fide 3rd party. They have a convention and everything and they have a candidate, Chase Oliver, for president. Go vote for Oliver if you want to waste a vote but the truth is that democrats aren't libertarian and they don't want a 3rd party. They have so much hatred for Trump that they can't bear to vote republican but they wish that that the democrat party had a better candidate and that ain't gonna happen.
 
There are many LEGITIMATE 3rd Parties. But people are gonna make choices. I once voted for the Constitution Party but other than that, I vote Republican. Never will I vote for a Democrat
 
you may want to read up on why the articles of confederation failed,,

if we were still under it we wouldnt exist and what would exist would look worse than pre-EU europe,,

not going to say progressives havent damaged the constitution since 1900 and that damage needs repaired,,

but under what has survived of the original intent of the constitution is the only reason we have it better than every other country on the planet,,

I chose to stand with others and preserve what we have and fight to repair the damage thats been done,,
Why did the Articles of Confederation fail? They got us through a whole revolution but suddenly they just failed?
 

Forum List

Back
Top