Does the current event of Cali wildfires contribute to manmade global warming? Scientists claim wildfires release huge quantities of greenhouse gases.

We are taking carbon out from those long term sources quicker than it is probably being sequestered, probably.

The thing is the system is so complex we have no idea how the system is trying to balance that out.


No, we can tell that atmospheric CO2 is rising. The CO2 FRAUD's problem is that while atmospheric CO2 is rising, atmospheric temperature did not.


THEORY REJECTED
 
The thing is the system is so complex



It really isn't. Earth Climate Change is actually very easy to understand... these two OPs do it...




 
You read my mind, and this is EXACTLY where I was going.
If I am evil because I drive a Suburban, the greenhouse gases and pollution from these Cali wildfires and like a billon Suburbans and a trillion COW FARTS.
WE MUST STOP COW FARTS, BUT WE WILL NOT PREVENT WILDFIRES! HUH?

Just remember what Smokey used to say:

https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.6ca8b2ed44cd16ad916e191a0e3311f4?rik=LxSP04Q08I9G%2fQ&riu=http%3a%2f%2flegendsrevealed.com%2fentertainment%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2015%2f10%2fsmokey1.jpg&ehk=z6e6otdw9ZnvcM2XqaYMeryd8TjirbFJk%2b5pHaBFX8o%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0


Bottom line is that if we can launch missions to Pluto and beyond, we can design communities to limit and control predictable, repeating, weather patterns of dryness and wind. California sits right next to a billion gallons of sea water and has huge aquifers to drain off water from the mountains yet has no means of pumping it where needed by fire hydrant?

Then these idiots build burnable homes on top of steep hillsides prone to fire acceleration with all kinds of dry brush around their homes and with no code to incorporate systems in the homes to soak them and the areas down to help suppress their burning.

I see a lot of EPA liability here. There is more than just an "act of nature" going on here. Gavin has spent far too much time worrying about pronouns instead.
 
No, we can tell that atmospheric CO2 is rising. The CO2 FRAUD's problem is that while atmospheric CO2 is rising, atmospheric temperature did not.


THEORY REJECTED

Again, regardless of us causing warming or not, my position is that we adjust to the situation, not demolish our standards of living in a futile effort to prevent things from happening.
 
It really isn't. Earth Climate Change is actually very easy to understand... these two OPs do it...





The system is far too complex to model beyond basic understanding of what is happening.

I've worked on models of wastewater treatment, which deal with far simpler biological systems, and even those have their limits, like all models.
 
There is not a chance in hell the smoke from these wildfires are good for the environment.

Not sure what we are all arguing.

How about all the solid waste from destroyed property?

What about toxic smoke from burning of toxic items like plastic and rubber?

If you claim a cow fart is bad, but wildfires are not…you are pretty stupid.

Cali has really dropped the ball on fuels reduction and eliminating overgrown vegetation.

You choose to live where this shit happens, and then you vote for stupid politicians and stupid policies.

Congrats Cali. You got what you voted for!
 
Again, regardless of us causing warming or not, my position is that we adjust to the situation, not demolish our standards of living in a futile effort to prevent things from happening.



That first requires a correct diagnosis.


 
The system is far too complex to model beyond basic understanding of what is happening.

I've worked on models of wastewater treatment, which deal with far simpler biological systems, and even those have their limits, like all models.



You and the rest cannot refute one word of those two OPs.


"far too complex" is inaccurate. It is actually pretty straighforward.
 
You and the rest cannot refute one word of those two OPs.


"far too complex" is inaccurate. It is actually pretty straighforward.

What I am saying is the OP is asking a useless question trying to "get the libs"

It's playing their own stupid game.
 
There is not a chance in hell the smoke from these wildfires are good for the environment.

Not sure what we are all arguing.

How about all the solid waste from destroyed property?

What about toxic smoke from burning of toxic items like plastic and rubber?

If you claim a cow fart is bad, but wildfires are not…you are pretty stupid.

Cali has really dropped the ball on fuels reduction and eliminating overgrown vegetation.

You choose to live where this shit happens, and then you vote for stupid politicians and stupid policies.

Congrats Cali. You got what you voted for!



CO2 FRAUD loves the fires. The media blames the fires on "warming" that doesn't exist.

It would be nice if there was ONE SINGLE PERSON in the "conservative media" who would actually ask questions and behave like a journalist, but that is not the case...
 
What I am saying is the OP is asking a useless question trying to "get the libs"

It's playing their own stupid game.



Disagree, it is another opportunity to show that CO2 FRAUD harms America by lying to America.

We should do what we can to stop the fires. CO2 keeps lying about the cause of the fires, so we cannot build desalination plants etc.


CO2 FRAUD harms America and the environment.

CO2 FRAUD is the problem.
 
Cali is prone to these environmental disasters that must contribute to climate change so much.

Billions of cubic yards of smoke in the atmosphere.

What is Cali doing to prevent these fires?


The people running California LOVE these fires. They'll never do a thing to prevent them. Every time one of these "disasters" strikes, it's a massive cash grab by the public employees unions (firefighters, cops, emergency services, etc.) and all the associated parasites (news organizations, vendors, etc.).

Firefighters from all over the state, for example, (and their leadership) get paid $10,000-$15,000 per week per person during these incidents, plus "bonus" pay for traveling, expenses, etc.

The massive quasi-governmental utilities like PG&E will not lift a finger to lessen the likelihood of fires and mass disasters caused by their old, poorly maintained equipment. They have no incentive to do so, and in fact they usually institute rate hikes after every big disaster.

It's a con, all of it.
 
CO2 FRAUD loves the fires. The media blames the fires on "warming" that doesn't exist.

It would be nice if there was ONE SINGLE PERSON in the "conservative media" who would actually ask questions and behave like a journalist, but that is not the case...
Wildfires and Volcanoes should be made illegal, I guess.
 
Disagree, it is another opportunity to show that CO2 FRAUD harms America by lying to America.

We should do what we can to stop the fires. CO2 keeps lying about the cause of the fires, so we cannot build desalination plants etc.


CO2 FRAUD harms America and the environment.

CO2 FRAUD is the problem.

And you don't fight AGW fraud by adding your own bad information to the argument.
 
Not filling reservoirs and cutting funding for firefighters IS SMART DEMOCRAT STRATEGY.

:113: :113:

Insurance companies dropped a bunch of homeowners a few weeks ago.

THE INSURANCE COMPANIES KNEW THE DEMOCRAT STRATGEY WOUOD RESULT IN THOUSANDS OF STRUCTURE FIRES.
 
I hate that I do not GAF about the Hollywood left wing cultists who have mow lost their homes…like Ben Affleck.

Ben will be fine.

Lots of people without his money lost everything because of shitty Democrat policies.
 
Are there enough heterosexual women in the LAFD?

THIS SEEMS LIKE A HUGE PROBLEM.

What % of the nation is HETEROSEXUAL WOMEN….AND HOW MANY ARE SERVING IN THE LAFD?
 

Forum List

Back
Top