WHILE you're thinking about these graphs, let's do another little exercise
Because graphs .. well... kinda like polls ... third party information from an unreliable second party.
So I'd like you to do this little verification exercise:
You can go to the DDHQ web site, and build a timeline of when they say they received data
You can also go to the Michigan SOS web site, to the press releases, and build a timeline of when they claim they released it, and specifically, when they claim the dump/typo/counting error (whatever it was) occurred, and how long it took to fix it
If everything's hunky dory and everyone's telling the truth, the two timelines should match. Right?
Because graphs .. well... kinda like polls ... third party information from an unreliable second party.
So I'd like you to do this little verification exercise:
You can go to the DDHQ web site, and build a timeline of when they say they received data
You can also go to the Michigan SOS web site, to the press releases, and build a timeline of when they claim they released it, and specifically, when they claim the dump/typo/counting error (whatever it was) occurred, and how long it took to fix it
If everything's hunky dory and everyone's telling the truth, the two timelines should match. Right?