Emma Stone Gets Oscar For Going Full-Retard

[iamwhatiseem]

I was one of the people that gave up on it too early. I just didn’t get the point. Next time I’ll watch it to the end

It is very much not for everyone.
Emma's performance playing the character was outstanding.
The messaging is the usual Hollywood - "all men are evil" - "all women are awesome".
Every man in the movie is deeply flawed. All the women are smarter than the men.
That is par for the course in post 2000s movies.

 

[marvin martian]

I had to turn this piece of garbage off after only 10 minutes. It was so despicable it made me a little sick to my stomach. Yet Emma Stone was nominated for an Oscar for her portrayal of a mentally challenged woman, and she won.

One of the opening scenes shows her tossing food and smashing plates.

What range she has.

Like being retarded has never been tried before. (Forrest Gump)

"Poor Things" is right up there with movies like "There Will Be Blood" for being depressing and disgusting.

If you want to see this piece of filth out of morbid curiosity, go for it. It's hailed by critics as "The Raunchiest Film Of The Decade".
I won't bother watching this crapfest to the end. I had enough.

I'm interested to see what Rottentomatoes gave it as a rating. Here it is. 92. What a surprise!!!!

Mark Ruffalo is a shitstain.

 

[Resnic]

I had to turn this piece of garbage off after only 10 minutes. It was so despicable it made me a little sick to my stomach. Yet Emma Stone was nominated for an Oscar for her portrayal of a mentally challenged woman, and she won.

One of the opening scenes shows her tossing food and smashing plates.

What range she has.

Like being retarded has never been tried before. (Forrest Gump)

"Poor Things" is right up there with movies like "There Will Be Blood" for being depressing and disgusting.

If you want to see this piece of filth out of morbid curiosity, go for it. It's hailed by critics as "The Raunchiest Film Of The Decade".
I won't bother watching this crapfest to the end. I had enough.

I'm interested to see what Rottentomatoes gave it as a rating. Here it is. 92. What a surprise!!!!

Well, had to you watched it you would have known it is not a realistic approach to being a retard. The entire movie is fiction, it isn't realistic at all. The whole movie is over the top on purpose

It's about a woman that kills herself and is brought back to life by a scientist and is not the same person. He tries to increase her intelligence and takes her all over the world.

You turned it off after 10 minutes then just made up wild assumptions about a 2 and half hour movie? And you seem so angry about something you don't understand. No wonder your post count vs reaction score is what it is.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well, had to you watched it you would have known it is not a realistic approach to being a retard. The entire movie is fiction, it isn't realistic at all. The whole movie is over the top on purpose

It's about a woman that kills herself and is brought back to life by a scientist and is not the same person. He tries to increase her intelligence and takes her all over the world.

You turned it off after 10 minutes then just made up wild assumptions about a 2 and half hour movie? And you seem so angry about something you don't understand. No wonder your post count vs reaction score is what it is.

What's wrong with my score?

FYI, I don't try to artificially raise my score, nor do I try to be dishonest so that people won't neg me.
I say what's on my mind and you can agree with it or not. (BTW, I post a lot of holiday pics...people tend to just look at them and not comment)

Look, when I watch a movie and it seems like a waste of time, I turn to something else, or I read a book.

 

[martybegan]

Playing a “retard“has always been a formula for winning an Oscar

Cliff Robertson for Charly
Dustin Hoffman for Rain Man
Tom Hanks for Forrest Gump

You just create a character and stay in character

None of them are full retard. Tropic Thunder explains.

 

[marvin martian]

If you say so.

Several billion people say so, actually.

 

[Resnic]

Because you posted 130,000 times but only had 66k reactions. I mean they mean little, but still shows most of what you post is just garbage, just like your so called review where you watched 7.1% of a movie and then went off and an odd rant and overly upset over something that not only isn't even real, but also something you don't know anything about.

 

[mudwhistle]

Because you posted 130,000 times but only had 66k reactions. I mean they mean little, but still shows most of what you post is just garbage, just like your so called review where you watched 7.1% of a movie and then went off and an odd rant and overly upset over something that not only isn't even real, but also something you don't know anything about.

Roughly half of what I post is Halloween pics and Christmas pics.

The 12th Annual USMB 2021 Halloween Thread

HAPPY HALLOWEEN

www.usmessageboard.com

You can call them rubbish if you want, but I've been doing it every year since 2010 and I'm not gonna stop even if it harelips every cannibal in Indonesia.

Also, I have a very long ignore list so I don't have to deal with wankers calling me nasty names because they don't agree with me.