Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 77,178
- 38,624
- 2,615
Thanks for the insight Q GirlHe might get suicided
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for the insight Q GirlHe might get suicided
And that is all you ever get from that one. Could make a fortune filling hot air balloons,All I hear / read from you is:
'I can't defend these criminals from the reality of what they have done so I will say something stupid to try to distract from it'...
SSDD....it's all you ever say with each moronic post.
"Anthony Ornato, the Secret Service official at the center of a hotly debated rumor about former President Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, has retired."
Despite Ornato, along with other SS members, came forward to offer 1st-hand account testimony to disprove Hutchinson RUMOR, his superiors publicly warned SS members about doing so (much like how US AG Garland is attempting to silence whistleblowers exposing corruption, crime, and bias within the DOJ & FBI).
“It’s not appropriate for us to make these comments in the media before we have a chance to address members of Congress,” Anthony Guglielmi, the Secret Service chief of communications, told The Daily Wire in late June.
The problem with that is the Democrats were / are doing everything they can to prevent whistleblowers like Ornato from being able to talk to Congress and expose the truth.
Ornato chose to retire rather than play the on-going corrupt partisan 'game'. He and his counsel have still coordinated a time / date for him to address Congress as a civilian / former SS agent to expose Hutchinson's false rumor.
'Despite Ornato, along with other SS members, came forward to offer 1st-hand account testimony to disprove Hutchinson RUMOR'
Ornato, a Trump appointee & lackey denied it.'Despite Ornato, along with other SS members, came forward to offer 1st-hand account testimony to disprove Hutchinson RUMOR'
This has been debuked already.Trump did have some kind of tantrum. He just didn't grab the wheel.
Wait....who debunked Hutchinson's claim? When did they do that under oath?"Anthony Ornato, the Secret Service official at the center of a hotly debated rumor about former President Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, has retired."
Despite Ornato, along with other SS members, came forward to offer 1st-hand account testimony to disprove Hutchinson RUMOR, his superiors publicly warned SS members about doing so (much like how US AG Garland is attempting to silence whistleblowers exposing corruption, crime, and bias within the DOJ & FBI).
“It’s not appropriate for us to make these comments in the media before we have a chance to address members of Congress,” Anthony Guglielmi, the Secret Service chief of communications, told The Daily Wire in late June.
The problem with that is the Democrats were / are doing everything they can to prevent whistleblowers like Ornato from being able to talk to Congress and expose the truth.
Ornato chose to retire rather than play the on-going corrupt partisan 'game'. He and his counsel have still coordinated a time / date for him to address Congress as a civilian / former SS agent to expose Hutchinson's false rumor.
When did the SS agents step up to testify under oath?I'm sure it's true that the Democrats want to silence Secret Service personnel who could destroy some of their narrative and, while I think it is imperative that Secret Service personnel keep the confidences of those they protect, how can we forbid them from speaking up when somebody has been unjustly accused?
And likewise, FBI personnel need to trust each other to have their backs, but when it is clear that the Bureau has been politically weaponized to commit crimes in order to 'get' somebody, how can we fault the ethical agent who finally speaks up?
At the same time, whether it's CNN or MSNBC or any of the other alphabet sources or Fox News, so long as they use 'anonymous sources', it is difficult to be certain what is and what is not fact.
He never stepped forward, and refused to testify under OATH as Cassidy did.Interesting, though, how his decision to finally retire came immediately after he stepped forward to debunk the lie about Trump & his boss threatens / warns SS members to keep.thrir mouths shut...
So you are claiming all tbe whistleblowers are liars?He never stepped forward, and refused to testify under OATH as Cassidy did.
So who's the liar?
You obviously have not learned the definition of "hearsay".Hutchinson never said she was there. She wasn't. She repeated what she was told.
She never said it was anything but thatYou obviously have not learned the definition of "hearsay".
This has been debuked already.
In the back of this car they have seats facing each other. Trump was facing forward with a SS member right in front of him.
Trump would have had to jump THROUGH this SS member, jump THROUGH the barrier separating the front / driver from the back, and jumped THROUGH the driver to get to the wheel.
Don't be a dupe.
As the article states, numerous SS members have come forward to disprove this liberal fairytale, and existing, physical facts like the above that have been repeatedly explained render the ability of Trump to get to the steering wheel impossible.
Maybe the DOJ will give him one of them subpennies?Ornato said he would testify,
You obviously have not learned the definition of "hearsay".
LOLThe left keeps doubling down... when we regain control we need to go through the Dems ranks like a wrecking ball and toss them all in prison....
I'm sure it's true that the Democrats want to silence Secret Service personnel who could destroy some of their narrative and, while I think it is imperative that Secret Service personnel keep the confidences of those they protect, how can we forbid them from speaking up when somebody has been unjustly accused?
And likewise, FBI personnel need to trust each other to have their backs, but when it is clear that the Bureau has been politically weaponized to commit crimes in order to 'get' somebody, how can we fault the ethical agent who finally speaks up?
At the same time, whether it's CNN or MSNBC or any of the other alphabet sources or Fox News, so long as they use 'anonymous sources', it is difficult to be certain what is and what is not fact.