DGS49
Diamond Member
- Apr 12, 2012
- 16,459
- 14,452
So consider the following:
The FDA has approved hundreds of potentially harmful drugs, because through research they have found that there are tangible, measurable health benefits that can be obtained by using them.
Consider, morphine, oxycontin, methadone, etc. Consider the number of prescription and OTC medications that contain significant amounts of alcohol.
But with all of the anecdotal "evidence" of the possible benefits of marijuana (and its contituent chemicals), the FDA has never approved it for any legitimate medical purpose. And consider that there are millions of people around the country who have been informally and formally campaigning to have it approved - even recognizing that all approval would mean would be that it could be legally prescribed throughout the fruited plain - and not just in a few renegade states.
Is it POSSIBLE that there is simply no beneficial use for MJ where there are not many other approved drugs already on the market that are just as good?
I had a conversation with my PA legislator last night and he (a former prosecutor) said that he would never support a legalization statute until the FDA comes around on this issue. Unless there is some benefit (the harms are in some dispute), he sees no point in legalizing it.
Please don't tell me about the little girl whose siezures miraculously went from 100 per day to 1 every three months after smoking dope. This is nothing more than a questionable anecdote.
The FDA has approved hundreds of potentially harmful drugs, because through research they have found that there are tangible, measurable health benefits that can be obtained by using them.
Consider, morphine, oxycontin, methadone, etc. Consider the number of prescription and OTC medications that contain significant amounts of alcohol.
But with all of the anecdotal "evidence" of the possible benefits of marijuana (and its contituent chemicals), the FDA has never approved it for any legitimate medical purpose. And consider that there are millions of people around the country who have been informally and formally campaigning to have it approved - even recognizing that all approval would mean would be that it could be legally prescribed throughout the fruited plain - and not just in a few renegade states.
Is it POSSIBLE that there is simply no beneficial use for MJ where there are not many other approved drugs already on the market that are just as good?
I had a conversation with my PA legislator last night and he (a former prosecutor) said that he would never support a legalization statute until the FDA comes around on this issue. Unless there is some benefit (the harms are in some dispute), he sees no point in legalizing it.
Please don't tell me about the little girl whose siezures miraculously went from 100 per day to 1 every three months after smoking dope. This is nothing more than a questionable anecdote.