Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
Watching Legal View with Ashleigh Banfield yesterday at ~11:30am, the eyewitness testimony given by Piaget Crenshaw struck me as curious. According to the witness,
"Police shouldn't be shooting this [young boy]..." I think it was young boy, possibly "kid."
In my notes I took watching I wrote, "Referring to Mr. Brown, a 6'4" nearly 300 pound 18 year-old as a young boy or kid suggests her witness testimony was formed only after learning details about the shooting. Unless in her eyes giants are 'young boys.' "
To me being 6'2" anyone taller than I am isn't a boy of any sort but a man. Presumedly she couldn't discern his face from her vantage point. So if she only learned who the decedent was afterwords, how long after? And how much of her alledged testimony comes from other reports revealing the age and identity of the deceased?
"Police shouldn't be shooting this [young boy]..." I think it was young boy, possibly "kid."
In my notes I took watching I wrote, "Referring to Mr. Brown, a 6'4" nearly 300 pound 18 year-old as a young boy or kid suggests her witness testimony was formed only after learning details about the shooting. Unless in her eyes giants are 'young boys.' "
To me being 6'2" anyone taller than I am isn't a boy of any sort but a man. Presumedly she couldn't discern his face from her vantage point. So if she only learned who the decedent was afterwords, how long after? And how much of her alledged testimony comes from other reports revealing the age and identity of the deceased?