Fewer than 1 in 5 Americans agree with Trump about annexing Greenland, Canada, according to new poll

[postman]

You are just DYING for it to be a no. You dont care that its good for the US, you just blindly oppose anything that Trump supports. Thats why your party is so despised. Youre a loser bro.

We could simply negotiate a bigger military presence in Greenland, like we did in countless NATO and non-NATO countries around the world.

We don't need to "own it".

 

[Catman51]

MSN

Trump is on the road to The Hague if he invades Greendland.

He becomes a war criminal.

Yet he thinks "'... we’re going to get [Greenland],' Trump told Congress earlier this month. 'One way or the other, we’re going to get it.'”

Yet only less than 20% of America wants to take Greenland.
\But according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, fewer than one in five Americans actually want the U.S. to “get” their northern neighbors.

We watched the American VP and his lovely wife visit at the end of the week. His blustering was distasteful

A Greenland official remarked that, however, “mere presence [of Waltz] in Greenland will no doubt fuel American belief in Trump’s mission — and the pressure will increase.”

If America invades, how is that different than Hitler's grabs in 1938 and 1939 in eastern Europe.

Walk this back, President Trump. Tell folks you just doing some good old boy fooling.

Your mentally defective side continues to cry wolf. You have no proof of this even being considered and yet continue to claim it as a hard and fast truth.

If I were to poll a group that I selected, as you seem to have done, The results would be just the opposite of what you are claiming. You libs seem only to listen to the polls that show what you desire and the hell with the truth.

Additionally, you continue to equate any actions that you don't approve of as being similar to those of Hitler when, in fact, it is your actions that reflect the Nazi ideals...Do as you are told, never question what your superiors tell and never question anything that you are told.

In other words, I , along with many others, am tired to your lying promoting propaganda to cover that you are failures and have nothing relating to the truth to spew.

 

[Nostra]

MSN

Trump is on the road to The Hague if he invades Greendland.

He becomes a war criminal.

Yet he thinks "'... we’re going to get [Greenland],' Trump told Congress earlier this month. 'One way or the other, we’re going to get it.'”

Yet only less than 20% of America wants to take Greenland.
\But according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, fewer than one in five Americans actually want the U.S. to “get” their northern neighbors.

We watched the American VP and his lovely wife visit at the end of the week. His blustering was distasteful

A Greenland official remarked that, however, “mere presence [of Waltz] in Greenland will no doubt fuel American belief in Trump’s mission — and the pressure will increase.”

If America invades, how is that different than Hitler's grabs in 1938 and 1939 in eastern Europe.

Walk this back, President Trump. Tell folks you just doing some good old boy fooling.

Online polls are as useless a your balls.

 

[Catman51]

And they are to a man saying NO, NEVER, and don't even think about it.

Greenlanders don't want it. And Denmark doesn't want it.

And you, of all people, have 100 of this and are commissioned to speak on behalf of the two countries? Let's see documentation of that or be proven, once again, a liar.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

How do you propose The Hague will bring him in?

Clearly Greenland’s European population consists of people who don’t know that the Arctic does not provide good conditions for civilization.

What? That’s an absurd comparison? Explain it.

No!

That’s what he wants you to think. He is absolutely serious about the coming invasion of Greenland.

Who could stop him?

I don't think the military command will permit it.

We are not Nazis.

Your mentally defective side continues to cry wolf. You have no proof of this even being considered and yet continue to claim it as a hard and fast truth.

If I were to poll a group that I selected, as you seem to have done, The results would be just the opposite of what you are claiming. You libs seem only to listen to the polls that show what you desire and the hell with the truth.

Additionally, you continue to equate any actions that you don't approve of as being similar to those of Hitler when, in fact, it is your actions that reflect the Nazi ideals...Do as you are told, never question what your superiors tell and never question anything that you are told.

In other words, I , along with many others, am tired to your lying promoting propaganda to cover that you are failures and have nothing relating to the truth to spew.

You have no idea of what you are talking about. Go away if you cannot add to the conversation. I am tired of your lies.

 

[Godboy]

We could simply negotiate a bigger military presence in Greenland, like we did in countless NATO and non-NATO countries around the world.

We don't need to "own it".

Owning it brings minerals to the US.

 

[Nobody911]

MSN

Trump is on the road to The Hague if he invades Greendland.

He becomes a war criminal.

Yet he thinks "'... we’re going to get [Greenland],' Trump told Congress earlier this month. 'One way or the other, we’re going to get it.'”

Yet only less than 20% of America wants to take Greenland.
\But according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, fewer than one in five Americans actually want the U.S. to “get” their northern neighbors.

We watched the American VP and his lovely wife visit at the end of the week. His blustering was distasteful

A Greenland official remarked that, however, “mere presence [of Waltz] in Greenland will no doubt fuel American belief in Trump’s mission — and the pressure will increase.”

If America invades, how is that different than Hitler's grabs in 1938 and 1939 in eastern Europe.

Walk this back, President Trump. Tell folks you just doing some good old boy fooling.

Trump shouldn't behave like Hitler, Putin, or Netanyahu; those authoritarian leaders are not good political models.


Annexing Greenland is not an optimal solution, several alternative strategies can enhance national security( against Russia and China )while respecting Greenland's sovereignty and Denmark's role:

●●●Best Feasible Solutions●●●

Enhanced Cooperation with Denmark and Greenland:

Security Agreements: Strengthen existing defense agreements between the U.S. and Denmark, ensuring continued access to strategic locations like the Pituffik Space Base. This can include joint military exercises and intelligence sharing to counter threats from Russia and China46.

Investment in Infrastructure: Collaborate on improving Greenland's infrastructure, which would support both local economic development and military operations. This could include upgrading ports, airfields, and communication systems13.

Economic Support and Development:

Investments in Natural Resources: Encourage U.S. companies to invest in Greenland's natural resources, such as rare earth metals, which are crucial for modern technology. This can help Greenland achieve economic independence and stability35.

Promote Sustainable Development: Support sustainable economic projects that align with Greenland's environmental and cultural values, fostering goodwill and cooperation5.

Diplomatic Engagement:

Encourage Independence Discussions: Support Greenland's potential move towards greater autonomy or independence from Denmark, allowing for direct diplomatic relations and agreements with the U.S.14.

Multilateral Engagement: Engage in multilateral forums like the Arctic Council to address regional security concerns and promote cooperation among Arctic nations5.

Military Presence and Capabilities:

Enhance U.S. Military Capabilities: Increase U.S. military assets in the Arctic, such as icebreakers and naval vessels, without necessarily expanding the footprint in Greenland. This would improve the ability to respond to regional threats23.

Partnerships with NATO Allies: Work closely with NATO allies, including Denmark, to ensure a unified response to security challenges in the Arctic26.

These strategies allow the U.S. to enhance its national security interests in the Arctic while respecting Greenland's sovereignty and avoiding the complexities associated with annexation.

sources:
1. JD Vance rips into Denmark’s government, urges Greenland to embrace US for security and economy: ‘You have not done a good job ‘
2. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5220515-denmark-greenland-security/
3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/greenland-trump-defense-russia-china/
4. Seizing Greenland Is Worse Than a Bad Deal
5. Trump’s Arctic strategy and Greenland security – GIS Reports
6. Trump has options to acquire Greenland, but few are realistic: Expert
7.
8. Why does Trump want Greenland and the Panama Canal? Here's what's behind U.S. interest.

 

[Catman51]

I don't think the military command will permit it.

We are not Nazis.

You have no idea of what you are talking about. Go away if you cannot add to the conversation. I am tired of your lies.

Speaking of lies, look in the mirror.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Speaking of lies, look in the mirror.

Give it up, kitty. Trump will go to The Hague before we take Greenland against its will.

 

[Seymour Flops]

What you folks don't get is that Trump saying that we will definitely take Greenland by any means necessary, or whatever, is a negotiating stance. He doesn't expect it to happen, but if Denmark, who are among the last of the remaining European colonizers of America think it might, that could give the reason to negotiate seriously for Greenland's independence.

I'm sure it sticks in Trump's craw that any of the Gaylords of Europe still feel that they "own" such a large American land mass. We should all want a Europe-free America, at this late date. The native people's of Kalaallit Nunaat are much more suited to live on that land, and are the majority of people on that land.

One negotiating point could be for Trump to let Denmark slide on all the military spending they are behind on for their obligation to NATO, if they give full and complete independence to Kalaallit Nunaat (now known as "Greenland"), and allow it membership in NATO. The U.S. could sponsor its military spending requirements in exchange for them being a strong ally against Russia.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I don't think the military command will permit it.

Of course you don't. But just a few posts later, you claim again that Trump will "go to the Hague."

We are not Nazis.

Right, so why keep bringing them up.

But me may witness a military coup and new elections.

Would that involve executing Trump? That would be the only thing that would stop him from winning that election.

Unless you guys go the ballot harvester route, again.

 

[Nostra]

Give it up, kitty. Trump will go to The Hague before we take Greenland against its will.

Why would he go to The Hague before he took it, Simp?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Of course you don't. But just a few posts later, you claim again that Trump will "go to the Hague."

Right, so why keep bringing them up.

Would that involve executing Trump? That would be the only thing that would stop him from winning that election.

Unless you guys go the ballot harvester route, again.

The Hague does not execute war criminals

He would lose on his own again.

Vance will run, and if he wins, his VP will resign, Vance will appoint Trump as VP, and then Vance will resign, and the Trump will become President.

Then the military will ship him to The Hague.

 

[TrumpMAGA88]

Online polls are as useless a your balls.

He cut them off when he "transitioned"

 

[postman]

Vance will run, and if he wins, his VP will resign, Vance will appoint Trump as VP, and then Vance will resign, and the Trump will become President.

This is the most legal way for Trump to get a third term.

Another idea advanced was to have Trump run as Vance's VP, and then have Vance resign.

But the clause in the 12th amendment requires the USSC to interpret the text

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

They have to decide if the 22nd just prevents someone from being elected, or if it makes them ineligible for the office.

 

[berg80]

MSN

Trump is on the road to The Hague if he invades Greendland.

He becomes a war criminal.

Yet he thinks "'... we’re going to get [Greenland],' Trump told Congress earlier this month. 'One way or the other, we’re going to get it.'”

Yet only less than 20% of America wants to take Greenland.
\But according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, fewer than one in five Americans actually want the U.S. to “get” their northern neighbors.

We watched the American VP and his lovely wife visit at the end of the week. His blustering was distasteful

A Greenland official remarked that, however, “mere presence [of Waltz] in Greenland will no doubt fuel American belief in Trump’s mission — and the pressure will increase.”

If America invades, how is that different than Hitler's grabs in 1938 and 1939 in eastern Europe.

Walk this back, President Trump. Tell folks you just doing some good old boy fooling.

 

[Kondor3]

This is the most legal way for Trump to get a third term.

Another idea advanced was to have Trump run as Vance's VP, and then have Vance resign.

But the clause in the 12th amendment requires the USSC to interpret the text

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

They have to decide if the 22nd just prevents someone from being elected, or if it makes them ineligible for the office.

Interesting. Alarming.

 

[Redfish]

Jesus, 1 in 5 Americans are actually cool with literally "taking" Greenland by force?!!! Then i guess nearly 100% will be cool with us merely asking Greenland to join the US. How could anyone disagree with that?

let the Greenlanders vote on whether they want to dump Denmark and become a US territory.

 

[Godboy]

let the Greenlanders vote on whether they want to dump Denmark and become a US territory.

EXACTLY!

 

[Redfish]

Give it up, kitty. Trump will go to The Hague before we take Greenland against its will.

NO one, absolutely no one has proposed taking greenland against its will, stop lying.