Originally posted by brneyedgrl80
I did say however in another post about the WOT, that I was against it from the beginning and still am. In fact, at the time, I was the only one to say that I was against it though on the poll there were 2 other peole who voted the same way.
Quick clarification question: When you use WOT do you mean the "War on Terror" as in the one against al quaida and other orgs, or is WOT the term you're using for Iraq?
I ask because, I can somewhat understand being against the invasion of Iraq. I don't agree with it, but I understand at least a couple legitimate arguments.
Now if you mean you're against fighting terrorists than I wonder how you can be against it. It would be one thing if we were oppressing these people that we call terrorists, but that's really not the case. In the past months terrorists have killed not just Americans but Iraqis as well. That is Iraqis themselves that have been targeted. People targeted because they either are halping or stand to gain from freedom. The power of the attackers is slipping away, which is exactley why they are attacking.
Again it would be one thing to oppose a war against terrorists if they were killing oppressors, but that is not why they kill people. They kill for one reason and one reason only. It is because we are not like them, we don't believe what they believe. They believe that anyone that does not have the same belief system they do must die. People say American's are intolerant of other cultures when the truth is terrorists are by far the most intolerant people of any group in the world. If this is how they wish to resolve their differences than i have no problem taking the fight to them instead of waiting for them to kill all of us.