Former NASA director: Possible abrupt cooling!!!

[frigidweirdo]

More bad news for the AGW alarmist nutters........

Who else is speculating about abrupt cooling? One name which might surprise you is former NASA GISS director James Hansen. From Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 ◦C global warming could be dangerous p3774;




Evidently sons.....its not about planet temperature at all.........it far more about global energy inbalances, which scientists still don't know dick about...........

North Atlantic ocean circulation and abrupt climate change during the last glaciation | Science

Here's the deal.

There's NATURAL warming and cooling and there's MAN MADE warming.

The sun spots have stopped, quite a few times, this is the sort of thing that leads to a NATURAL cooling. Now, Natural cooling + MAN MADE warming does what? Well it depends on how much of each. The problem isn't the cooling, the problem is the natural warming after the natural cooling,

well CO2 cools not warms. So your first thought is not accurate so the rest is all flimflam.

here:

CO2
"These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :-

The pictures below demonstrate how simple it should be to show the "Greenhouse Effect" experimentally. Plastic greenhouses work just as well as glass ones. The size is not important either because as we know greenhouses come in all different shapes and sizes. These bottles are to all intents and purposes, mini greenhouses. The one on the right contains ordinary air and tap water and the one the left sparkling mineral water vigorously shaken to produce enough pure CO2 to fill the container.

These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :

Brown - Green 0 Blue +"

Your source isn't exactly top class is it? Who is your source exactly? Is it W R Pratt???

I have W R Pratt dead in 1962

Obituary: W. R. PRATT, M.B., Ch.B

I have one who gave a review on Amazon

Amazon.co.uk: W. R. Pratt's review of Verbatim 49091 Usb Speaker System Black

Vinton, Virginia

William R. Pratt

Working for Microsoft....

not really found this budding scientist who is so on top of it all he (or she) is using soda bottles.

The fact that this W R Pratt is missing is that while it's called the Greenhouse Effect, no one is saying the Earth is ACTUALLY a greenhouse, oh, except this guy, who makes greenhouses out of soda bottles. Also, he seems to be measuring the edge of the greenhouse, as in, he'd be saying the Greenhouse effect makes the STRATOSPHERE colder when the Earth's surface has more CO2.

Okay, let's just say not much of what he did makes much sense.

W. Pratt - Find Email Address, Phone Number & More.

so then you have an experiment that shows something different? let's see it. At least this dude did one. I haven't seen one from all of the so called experts. Not a one. again, one that shows CO2 affects temperatures. That one. Find it and post it up. If not, then mine stands.

I could give you an experiment that shows different stuff, like if you kick the bed too often your toe hurts like hell. So what? His experiment doesn't show shit for what we're talking about. So.... WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT IN PRESENTING CRAP?

 

[JimBowie1958]

More bad news for the AGW alarmist nutters........

Who else is speculating about abrupt cooling? One name which might surprise you is former NASA GISS director James Hansen. From Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 ◦C global warming could be dangerous p3774;




Evidently sons.....its not about planet temperature at all.........it far more about global energy inbalances, which scientists still don't know dick about...........

North Atlantic ocean circulation and abrupt climate change during the last glaciation | Science

Here's the deal.

There's NATURAL warming and cooling and there's MAN MADE warming.

The sun spots have stopped, quite a few times, this is the sort of thing that leads to a NATURAL cooling. Now, Natural cooling + MAN MADE warming does what? Well it depends on how much of each. The problem isn't the cooling, the problem is the natural warming after the natural cooling,

well CO2 cools not warms. So your first thought is not accurate so the rest is all flimflam.

here:

CO2
"These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :-

The pictures below demonstrate how simple it should be to show the "Greenhouse Effect" experimentally. Plastic greenhouses work just as well as glass ones. The size is not important either because as we know greenhouses come in all different shapes and sizes. These bottles are to all intents and purposes, mini greenhouses. The one on the right contains ordinary air and tap water and the one the left sparkling mineral water vigorously shaken to produce enough pure CO2 to fill the container.

These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :

Brown - Green 0 Blue +"

Your source isn't exactly top class is it? Who is your source exactly? Is it W R Pratt???

When you cant attack the facts attack the messenger, right dude?

 

[JimBowie1958]

More bad news for the AGW alarmist nutters........

Who else is speculating about abrupt cooling? One name which might surprise you is former NASA GISS director James Hansen. From Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 ◦C global warming could be dangerous p3774;

I could give you an experiment that shows different stuff, like if you kick the bed too often your toe hurts like hell. So what? His experiment doesn't show shit for what we're talking about. So.... WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT IN PRESENTING CRAP?

roflmao

 

[jc456]

More bad news for the AGW alarmist nutters........

Who else is speculating about abrupt cooling? One name which might surprise you is former NASA GISS director James Hansen. From Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 ◦C global warming could be dangerous p3774;




Evidently sons.....its not about planet temperature at all.........it far more about global energy inbalances, which scientists still don't know dick about...........

North Atlantic ocean circulation and abrupt climate change during the last glaciation | Science

Here's the deal.

There's NATURAL warming and cooling and there's MAN MADE warming.

The sun spots have stopped, quite a few times, this is the sort of thing that leads to a NATURAL cooling. Now, Natural cooling + MAN MADE warming does what? Well it depends on how much of each. The problem isn't the cooling, the problem is the natural warming after the natural cooling,

well CO2 cools not warms. So your first thought is not accurate so the rest is all flimflam.

here:

CO2
"These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :-

The pictures below demonstrate how simple it should be to show the "Greenhouse Effect" experimentally. Plastic greenhouses work just as well as glass ones. The size is not important either because as we know greenhouses come in all different shapes and sizes. These bottles are to all intents and purposes, mini greenhouses. The one on the right contains ordinary air and tap water and the one the left sparkling mineral water vigorously shaken to produce enough pure CO2 to fill the container.

These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :

Brown - Green 0 Blue +"

Your source isn't exactly top class is it? Who is your source exactly? Is it W R Pratt???

I have W R Pratt dead in 1962

Obituary: W. R. PRATT, M.B., Ch.B

I have one who gave a review on Amazon

Amazon.co.uk: W. R. Pratt's review of Verbatim 49091 Usb Speaker System Black

Vinton, Virginia

William R. Pratt

Working for Microsoft....

not really found this budding scientist who is so on top of it all he (or she) is using soda bottles.

The fact that this W R Pratt is missing is that while it's called the Greenhouse Effect, no one is saying the Earth is ACTUALLY a greenhouse, oh, except this guy, who makes greenhouses out of soda bottles. Also, he seems to be measuring the edge of the greenhouse, as in, he'd be saying the Greenhouse effect makes the STRATOSPHERE colder when the Earth's surface has more CO2.

Okay, let's just say not much of what he did makes much sense.

W. Pratt - Find Email Address, Phone Number & More.

so then you have an experiment that shows something different? let's see it. At least this dude did one. I haven't seen one from all of the so called experts. Not a one. again, one that shows CO2 affects temperatures. That one. Find it and post it up. If not, then mine stands.

I could give you an experiment that shows different stuff, like if you kick the bed too often your toe hurts like hell. So what? His experiment doesn't show shit for what we're talking about. So.... WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT IN PRESENTING CRAP?

it's called evidence and it is part of science. Are you saying CO2 isn't a part of science?

Like I already knew, you ain't got one. I LOL. More evidence of the fraud.

 

[skookerasbil]

even funnier.........snow in the Rockies this weekend................July 10th

Who's going to look pretty fucking stoopid this weekend??


Dang this forum is a rip...................

Damn. Dumb fuck east coasters. Snow at high elevations in the mountains of the West in July is hardly unusual. Whether the Rockies, Cascades, Sierras, or the Blues.

LOL.........but bad, bad optics if you are crying hysterical about a warming world!! Doesn't take some level of genius to realize that tens of millions look at this and say, "WTF s0ns?"........"these people keep talking about the dangers of climate change and its still snowing in summer.......wtf?". THATS the way it plays in the real world.......not the makey-uppey geek science obsessed world!! Its a fairly simple connect the dots exercise, actually.


The fact is, what the people see isn't conforming with what the alarmists are saying............not by a long shot and now this is going on for well over 2 decades. When the Great Lakes freeze over completely year after year recently, the optics are not good s0ns!!! The credibility of the alarmists takes a huge hit.......nobody is sitting home studying this shit.....nobody. They couldn't give a shit about what the Royal Society said last week. Alarmists don't deal in absolute truths.....they live in a world of makey-uppey truths, half-truths or in many cases, a world of pure fantasy. They see the world differently than the overwhelming numbers in the population......very differently. People get their information in little tiny dribs and drabs and measure the landscape incrementally over time. THATS why nobody is talking about climate change this election season.......because it is a non-issue except for the alarmists OCD's.

I posted it up the other day........even a hardened climate science from a major university said the other day in REALCLEARPOLITICS that the science community is doing it wrong. The message is being ignored......"explaining the science" has been a disaster.And it clearly has been. Nobody is talking about Paris anymore........countries are balking left and right. And the US is set to kick in about 20 billion over time = laughable.....that's like me showing up at the car stealership with a $5 bill and saying, "Sell me a car boys!!" 25 years later, renewable energy is still a complete joke.

How many people are seeing snow in the Rockies in July and saying, "Shit.....the AGW crowd is spot on again!!!" ?? About 17?

 

[mamooth]

Deniers have been predicting this new ice age for decades now, nonstop. In the 1970s, hardcore denier Reid Bryson created and pushed the ice age theory, while all the other scientists were predicting warming. That ice age never arrives, but deniers keep trying. They have faith. 40 years of nonstop failure is no impediment to that faith. Quite the contrary, they think the way they cling to their faith despite such total failure is a good thing, because it proves what devoted cultists they are.

Skook, do you know how to get everyone to stop laughing at you for being that kind of loser?

You can't. There's no way. That big "L" is now tattooed on your forehead, permanently, so your humiliation will never end. The only way to stop hearing all the laughter directed at you would be to withdraw from society completely.

 

[skookerasbil]

Deniers have been predicting this new ice age for decades now, nonstop. In the 1970s, hardcore denier Reid Bryson created and pushed the ice age theory, while all the other scientists were predicting warming. That ice age never arrives, but deniers keep trying. They have faith. 40 years of nonstop failure is no impediment to that faith. Quite the contrary, they think the way the cling to their faith despite such total failure is a good thing, because it proves what devoted cultists they are.

Skook, do you know how to get everyone to stop laughing at you for being that kind of loser?

You can't. There's no way. That big "L" is now tattooed on your forehead, permanently, so your humiliation will never end. The only way to stop hearing all the laughter directed at you would be to withdraw from society completely.

Loving the loser moniker s0n >>>


‘Rapid cooling’ underway: Big Drop In Earth’s June Temperatures According To Satellites

Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/07/06/rapid-cooling-underway-big-drop-in-june-temperatures-according-to-satellites/#ixzz4DlVIt7mq


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/huh.gif.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

So.......while the AGW k00ks continue to navigate in fantasyland while temperatures drop and interest in global warming continue to fall like a stone in water ( according to every poll ), sk00ks is compelled to dust this gem off after popular demand from forum members following public humiliation episodes.............

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/cucumber.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[Billy_Bob]

even funnier.........snow in the Rockies this weekend................July 10th

Who's going to look pretty fucking stoopid this weekend??


Dang this forum is a rip...................

Damn. Dumb fuck east coasters. Snow at high elevations in the mountains of the West in July is hardly unusual. Whether the Rockies, Cascades, Sierras, or the Blues.

Old Fraud fails again... YELLOWSTONE will see snow in the valley at 5,470 feet above sea level... They saw some last night when the nite time temp was just 34 deg F. FYI normal nite time temps are supposed to be 50 to 55 deg F this time of year.

IT is VERY unusual at that elevation and in July.... More is expected this weekend..

 

[frigidweirdo]

Here's the deal.

There's NATURAL warming and cooling and there's MAN MADE warming.

The sun spots have stopped, quite a few times, this is the sort of thing that leads to a NATURAL cooling. Now, Natural cooling + MAN MADE warming does what? Well it depends on how much of each. The problem isn't the cooling, the problem is the natural warming after the natural cooling,

well CO2 cools not warms. So your first thought is not accurate so the rest is all flimflam.

here:

CO2
"These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :-

The pictures below demonstrate how simple it should be to show the "Greenhouse Effect" experimentally. Plastic greenhouses work just as well as glass ones. The size is not important either because as we know greenhouses come in all different shapes and sizes. These bottles are to all intents and purposes, mini greenhouses. The one on the right contains ordinary air and tap water and the one the left sparkling mineral water vigorously shaken to produce enough pure CO2 to fill the container.

These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :

Brown - Green 0 Blue +"

Your source isn't exactly top class is it? Who is your source exactly? Is it W R Pratt???

I have W R Pratt dead in 1962

Obituary: W. R. PRATT, M.B., Ch.B

I have one who gave a review on Amazon

Amazon.co.uk: W. R. Pratt's review of Verbatim 49091 Usb Speaker System Black

Vinton, Virginia

William R. Pratt

Working for Microsoft....

not really found this budding scientist who is so on top of it all he (or she) is using soda bottles.

The fact that this W R Pratt is missing is that while it's called the Greenhouse Effect, no one is saying the Earth is ACTUALLY a greenhouse, oh, except this guy, who makes greenhouses out of soda bottles. Also, he seems to be measuring the edge of the greenhouse, as in, he'd be saying the Greenhouse effect makes the STRATOSPHERE colder when the Earth's surface has more CO2.

Okay, let's just say not much of what he did makes much sense.

W. Pratt - Find Email Address, Phone Number & More.

so then you have an experiment that shows something different? let's see it. At least this dude did one. I haven't seen one from all of the so called experts. Not a one. again, one that shows CO2 affects temperatures. That one. Find it and post it up. If not, then mine stands.

I could give you an experiment that shows different stuff, like if you kick the bed too often your toe hurts like hell. So what? His experiment doesn't show shit for what we're talking about. So.... WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT IN PRESENTING CRAP?

it's called evidence and it is part of science. Are you saying CO2 isn't a part of science?

Like I already knew, you ain't got one. I LOL. More evidence of the fraud.

But some evidence doesn't make your case. What's this guy got? That if you stick a fizzy drink in one bottle, and water in the other, and leave it in your window in January that you might get a different temperature reading on the outside. What's the temperature recording? The air inside the bottle? No. The water inside the bottle? No. The temperature outside the bottle? Yes. How does this provide evidence that helps your case in any way? Or are you simply clutching at straws?

The system of the Earth is very complex, it isn't a bottle with sparkling water. The oceans play a massive role, they take in a lot of the CO2 meaning that the amount we pump into the atmosphere doesn't always stay there, but is having a massively negative impact on the oceans, and the oceans could suddenly decide to stop taking in more CO2, which would cause major problems.

Also, you have to remember, the Earth is a ball, the sunlight comes from outside in, the Earth isn't see through like those bottles. So, with those bottles the heat can come in one side, and leave the other side, with the Earth this isn't possible, it has to come in, and then go back through the CO2 and other stuff in the atmosphere.

Really, if you're intent of proving something, at least do so with science that is actually relevant to the debate, otherwise you seem more desperate than a horny teenage boy.

 

[jc456]

well CO2 cools not warms. So your first thought is not accurate so the rest is all flimflam.

here:

CO2
"These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :-

The pictures below demonstrate how simple it should be to show the "Greenhouse Effect" experimentally. Plastic greenhouses work just as well as glass ones. The size is not important either because as we know greenhouses come in all different shapes and sizes. These bottles are to all intents and purposes, mini greenhouses. The one on the right contains ordinary air and tap water and the one the left sparkling mineral water vigorously shaken to produce enough pure CO2 to fill the container.

These thermometers, the backs of which are shaded from direct incoming Sunlight with aluminium foil, read as follows :

Brown - Green 0 Blue +"

Your source isn't exactly top class is it? Who is your source exactly? Is it W R Pratt???

I have W R Pratt dead in 1962

Obituary: W. R. PRATT, M.B., Ch.B

I have one who gave a review on Amazon

Amazon.co.uk: W. R. Pratt's review of Verbatim 49091 Usb Speaker System Black

Vinton, Virginia

William R. Pratt

Working for Microsoft....

not really found this budding scientist who is so on top of it all he (or she) is using soda bottles.

The fact that this W R Pratt is missing is that while it's called the Greenhouse Effect, no one is saying the Earth is ACTUALLY a greenhouse, oh, except this guy, who makes greenhouses out of soda bottles. Also, he seems to be measuring the edge of the greenhouse, as in, he'd be saying the Greenhouse effect makes the STRATOSPHERE colder when the Earth's surface has more CO2.

Okay, let's just say not much of what he did makes much sense.

W. Pratt - Find Email Address, Phone Number & More.

so then you have an experiment that shows something different? let's see it. At least this dude did one. I haven't seen one from all of the so called experts. Not a one. again, one that shows CO2 affects temperatures. That one. Find it and post it up. If not, then mine stands.

I could give you an experiment that shows different stuff, like if you kick the bed too often your toe hurts like hell. So what? His experiment doesn't show shit for what we're talking about. So.... WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT IN PRESENTING CRAP?

it's called evidence and it is part of science. Are you saying CO2 isn't a part of science?

Like I already knew, you ain't got one. I LOL. More evidence of the fraud.

But some evidence doesn't make your case. What's this guy got? That if you stick a fizzy drink in one bottle, and water in the other, and leave it in your window in January that you might get a different temperature reading on the outside. What's the temperature recording? The air inside the bottle? No. The water inside the bottle? No. The temperature outside the bottle? Yes. How does this provide evidence that helps your case in any way? Or are you simply clutching at straws?

The system of the Earth is very complex, it isn't a bottle with sparkling water. The oceans play a massive role, they take in a lot of the CO2 meaning that the amount we pump into the atmosphere doesn't always stay there, but is having a massively negative impact on the oceans, and the oceans could suddenly decide to stop taking in more CO2, which would cause major problems.

Also, you have to remember, the Earth is a ball, the sunlight comes from outside in, the Earth isn't see through like those bottles. So, with those bottles the heat can come in one side, and leave the other side, with the Earth this isn't possible, it has to come in, and then go back through the CO2 and other stuff in the atmosphere.

Really, if you're intent of proving something, at least do so with science that is actually relevant to the debate, otherwise you seem more desperate than a horny teenage boy.

so you still don't have any experiment. Told you so.