Fossil Fuel's War to Delay Action on Global Warming

[Dagosa]

If you cannot answer that question, you know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about Earth climate change...

Just so you don’t post anymore stupid shit, these are the average temps over the last 2000 years. Obviously, the climate changes. No shit. But since about 1880 the RATE. of change has increased or accelerated faster than anytime in the history man has been on this planet. Now, that doesn’t mean anything to you, cause you’re a denier…but stop acting dumb….notice the red area. The slope is greater. Slope on a graph of this type represents the rate. Notice it’s steeper. That means the rate of change is greater.
Now stop posting stupid shit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But since about 1880 the RATE. of change has increased or accelerated faster than anytime in the history man has been on this planet.

Link?

 

[Crick]

Link?

Global Warming

Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Global Warming: How does today's climate compare to history and the future? | ClimateScience

Take action on system climate solutions. Science-backed, easy-to-understand climate education for everyone.

climatescience.org

Today's Climate Change Proves Much Faster Than Changes in Past 65 Million Years

Climate change is occurring 10 to 100 times faster than in the past and ecosystems will find it hard to adjust

www.scientificamerican.com

Did you actually think his statement was false?

 

[ding]

Global Warming

Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Global Warming: How does today's climate compare to history and the future? | ClimateScience

Take action on system climate solutions. Science-backed, easy-to-understand climate education for everyone.

climatescience.org

Today's Climate Change Proves Much Faster Than Changes in Past 65 Million Years

Climate change is occurring 10 to 100 times faster than in the past and ecosystems will find it hard to adjust

www.scientificamerican.com

Did you actually think his statement was false?

Yes, I do believe that unsubstantiated claim is false. The geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends not cause by CO2 or orbital forcing.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Global Warming

Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Global Warming: How does today's climate compare to history and the future? | ClimateScience

Take action on system climate solutions. Science-backed, easy-to-understand climate education for everyone.

climatescience.org

Today's Climate Change Proves Much Faster Than Changes in Past 65 Million Years

Climate change is occurring 10 to 100 times faster than in the past and ecosystems will find it hard to adjust

www.scientificamerican.com

Did you actually think his statement was false?

Thanks for the links.
Which one shows that the most recent 144-year period
warmed faster than every other 144-year period?

Did you actually think his statement was false?

It absolutely is unprovable.

 

[Mac-7]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

I deny the hair-on-fire man-made global warming DOOMSDAY hoax

The climate has never been static and never will be

But the hysterical lib fear mongering about the end of civilization if we dont turn society upsidedown is ridiculous

 

[Dagosa]

deny the hair-on-fire man-made global warming DOOMSDAY hoax

That’s ok . You can keep repeating your total ignorance. It s not about change only as you keep pretending , it’s the rate of change, faster than any time modern man has been on earth. And, any chart of legit temp change that YOU bozos have ever posted shows it clearly….and you’re too blind or ignorant to even see it.

 

[ding]

it’s the rate of change, faster than any time modern man has been on earth.

Is it?

 

[Crick]

Is it?

View attachment 913342

The span of current heating, per Todd, is 144 years. None of your warming phases last anywhere near that long (the minor divisions of your graph are 100 years, so 1.44 minor divisions) nor do any of them show as much total warming. And there isn't the slightest hint that current warming is slowing. There's also the uncertainty of the proxy data you're using for your claim. As Todd likes to point out, the accuracy of a proxy record over that short an interval - and thus the accuracy of the warming rates you're claiming - is low.

 

[ding]

The span of current heating, per Todd, is 144 years. None of your warming phases last anywhere near that long (the minor divisions of your graph are 100 years, so 1.44 minor divisions) nor do any of them show as much total warming. And there isn't the slightest hint that current warming is slowing. There's also the uncertainty of the proxy data you're using for your claim. As Todd likes to point out, the accuracy of a proxy record over that short an interval - and thus the accuracy of the warming rates you're claiming - is low.

That's arbitrary and ridiculous at the same time.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The span of current heating, per Todd, is 144 years. None of your warming phases last anywhere near that long (the minor divisions of your graph are 100 years, so 1.44 minor divisions) nor do any of them show as much total warming. And there isn't the slightest hint that current warming is slowing. There's also the uncertainty of the proxy data you're using for your claim. As Todd likes to point out, the accuracy of a proxy record over that short an interval - and thus the accuracy of the warming rates you're claiming - is low.

And there isn't the slightest hint that current warming is slowing.

There was no hint that the previous warming was slowing. Until it did.

 

[EMH]

Just so you don’t post anymore stupid shit, these are the average temps over the last 2000 years. Obviously, the climate changes. No shit. But since about 1880 the RATE. of change has increased or accelerated faster than anytime in the history man has been on this planet. Now, that doesn’t mean anything to you, cause you’re a denier…but stop acting dumb….notice the red area. The slope is greater. Slope on a graph of this type represents the rate. Notice it’s steeper. That means the rate of change is greater.
Now stop posting stupid shit.








View attachment 912944

An inability to understand the difference between data and FUDGE is required to believe the Co2 FRAUD....


Tell us in great detail how that fudge chart was constructed....

LOL!!!

 

[EMH]

And there isn't the slightest hint that current warming is slowing.

There was no hint that the previous warming was slowing. Until it did.

And this is what most of the "conservative" Zionist Fascist "skeptics" do. They keep ACCEPTING FUDGE as "data" and they shout down the irrefutable truth of the Land near the Poles theory.

It appears they are "against" the Co2 FRAUD, that they are "skeptics" but in reality, they are all about


NOT ALLOWING ANY REAL SKEPTICISM OF THE FUDGED FRAUD "evidence" of "warming" now.

 

[EMH]

Global Warming

Global warming is happening now, and scientists are confident that greenhouse gases are responsible. To understand what this means for humanity, it is necessary to understand what global warming is, how scientists know it's happening, and how they predict future climate.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Global Warming: How does today's climate compare to history and the future? | ClimateScience

Take action on system climate solutions. Science-backed, easy-to-understand climate education for everyone.

climatescience.org

Today's Climate Change Proves Much Faster Than Changes in Past 65 Million Years

Climate change is occurring 10 to 100 times faster than in the past and ecosystems will find it hard to adjust

www.scientificamerican.com

Did you actually think his statement was false?

That's right, fellow Jew Supremacist!!!

Make sure your "skeptic" Zionist Fascist Jew Supremacist pet never questions the FUDGE....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And this is what most of the "conservative" Zionist Fascist "skeptics" do. They keep ACCEPTING FUDGE as "data" and they shout down the irrefutable truth of the Land near the Poles theory.

It appears they are "against" the Co2 FRAUD, that they are "skeptics" but in reality, they are all about


NOT ALLOWING ANY REAL SKEPTICISM OF THE FUDGED FRAUD "evidence" of "warming" now.

Behind you....it's a Jew!!!

 

[Dagosa]

An inability to understand the difference between data and FUDGE is required to believe the Co2 FRAUD....


Tell us in great detail how that fudge chart was constructed....

LOL!!!

You math illiterates use the word “data“ when you’re exposed to math / science concepts you are ignorant of.
Do you know anything about rate of change ? I got you covered, nope.

Go ahead, post your own temp chart over the last one to two thousand years….go for it.

 

[Dagosa]

And this is what most of the "conservative" Zionist Fascist "skeptics" do. They keep ACCEPTING FUDGE as "data" and they shout down the irrefutable truth of the Land near the Poles theory.

It appears they are "against" the Co2 FRAUD, that they are "skeptics" but in reality, they are all about


NOT ALLOWING ANY REAL SKEPTICISM OF THE FUDGED FRAUD "evidence" of "warming" now.

I can do this all day, you can’t because you are a fraud
…


Phys.org.

 

[EMH]

Behind you....it's a Jew!!!

That's not a denial.... TRAITOR.

 

[EMH]

You math illiterates use the word “data“ when you’re exposed to math / science concepts you are ignorant of.
Do you know anything about rate of change ? I got you covered, nope.

Go ahead, post your own temp chart over the last one to two thousand years….go for it.

Translation = DAG just PARROTED a FUDGE CHART and CANNOT DEFEND how it was constructed, which is


1. lying about URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT
2. FUDGING all other temp data


Your "theory" is that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming. Let's go over the two methods here, science and "climate science."


Science = highly correlated satellite and balloon data shows NO WARMING in the atmosphere during three decades of rising Co2

THEORY REJECTED

"climate science" = fudge both satellite and balloon data to show "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST and blame Co2 for it

 

[EMH]

I can do this all day, you can’t because you are a fraud
…


Phys.org.



View attachment 913827

You can cut and paste fudge charts and fraud all day without having a clue about how the chart was constructed....


We know. You have a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN....