BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,791
- 26,964
Nope. Nixon wouldn't have gone to prison.We would have, if Gerald Ford didn't give Richard Nixon a presidential pardon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. Nixon wouldn't have gone to prison.We would have, if Gerald Ford didn't give Richard Nixon a presidential pardon.
Trump hasn't broken any laws or been charged with anything. You're swallowing the propaganda.We haven't yet.
But then again, we've never had a POTUS like this train wreck before.
Have we?
We don't put ex Presidents in prison.
Democrats lie about everything.The part where democrats lie.
Yep. Big difference between charged and convicted.National Archives releases draft indictment of Richard Nixon amid Mueller probe | CNN Politics
The National Archives released a central set of documents from the Watergate scandal on Wednesday, including a would-be indictment against President Richard Nixon, following a lawsuit pointing to its relevance in the current era.www.cnn.com
The National Archives released a central set of documents from the Watergate scandal on Wednesday, including a would-be indictment against President Richard Nixon
The draft indictment showed that a grand jury planned to charge Nixon with bribery, conspiracy, obstruction of justice and obstruction of a criminal investigation.
Sure he has.Trump hasn't broken any laws or been charged with anything. You're swallowing the propaganda.
Nixons co-conspirators were indicted, tried, convicted, sentenced, and sent to prison.Yep. Big difference between charged and convicted.
They said the same thing about not being charged, about Steve Bannon.Sure he has.
You know as well as I do he has broken plenty of laws.
He just hasn't been charged yet.
The entire Biden Presidency.From emboldening the Taliban"to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security."
What part of national security do you object to?
Incredible.... Transparent NOT !!!!!!!!!
These people are sick.
Otherwise in order to attempt to set him up yet again, he can't see the train coming until it runs him over this time eh ? I thought entrapment was against the law or at the least an unorthodoxed way of doing things, but you Democrat's (I forgot), are rewriting the rules so nothing matters anymore in the way of structured law and order nor does a supposed blind unbiased justice exist anymore today. Pitiful situation in this country these days, and I mean Pitiful...More Trump Cult bullshit. Forget ever seeing that. It would give away how his prosecution will proceed giving him a chance to refine his lies.
They don’t have parsons for life. You’re insane.We don't put ex Presidents in prison.
Tough. Stop breaking the law.The part where a President's home is raided by armed government goons.
Then charge him.Sure he has.
You know as well as I do he has broken plenty of laws.
He just hasn't been charged yet.
Unless they're white cops shooting unarmed blacks.I always have. And I support the FBI.
What law has he broken?Tough. Stop breaking the law.
Obstruction. Possibly espionage.What law has he broken?
Crime loverI always have. And I support the FBI.
This is to protect Garland's ass, not national security."to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security."
What part of national security do you object to?