Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree it says that, but the title qualifies the topic of what the section regulates.No, it doesn’t. It plainly says “no person”. The plain language of the law contradicts your assertions. “No person” means “no person”. No where is a person defined as you assert.yes it does...it qualifies the subsection....yes it's the title, it specific about campaigns....not the activity of people not involved in the campaign.Incorrect. That part you refer to is merely a title of the section. It does not define “person” as someone associated with a campaign.You are ignoring the Section above subsection (a)...that qualifies the "person" - to campaign activities
It specifically says no person. If they intended for it to apply to campaigns, they would have said so.
Seems pretty clear and obvious to me...even state legislatures that help with the bill said that was their intent....but I suppose we will have to see how a Court views it...we obviously view it differently
I have my doubts about the honesty of people who pass voting restrictions just because they lost an election. Not to mention the red flag of them passing it in both houses and signing into law all in one day.
The title doesn’t qualify anything about who a person is and isn’t according to the law. It’s just a title.I agree it says that, but the title qualifies the topic of what the section regulates.No, it doesn’t. It plainly says “no person”. The plain language of the law contradicts your assertions. “No person” means “no person”. No where is a person defined as you assert.yes it does...it qualifies the subsection....yes it's the title, it specific about campaigns....not the activity of people not involved in the campaign.Incorrect. That part you refer to is merely a title of the section. It does not define “person” as someone associated with a campaign.You are ignoring the Section above subsection (a)...that qualifies the "person" - to campaign activities
It specifically says no person. If they intended for it to apply to campaigns, they would have said so.
Seems pretty clear and obvious to me...even state legislatures that help with the bill said that was their intent....but I suppose we will have to see how a Court views it...we obviously view it differently
I have my doubts about the honesty of people who pass voting restrictions just because they lost an election. Not to mention the red flag of them passing it in both houses and signing into law all in one day.
I share your concerns, also about people that just won an election...and ram it through as riders to legislation that suppose to be about something else..for example HR1
Snowflake, you could lose a few pounds. Relax.People will be prohibited from taking food and water to voters waiting in line, which has become common in past Georgia elections, in which voters have waited extremely long hours to cast ballots in the past.
Fuck you GOP.
How much water do you need for a five hour wait in the Georgia sun?Democrats believe Black people are to stupid to bring their own drinks and snacks.Well folks you can now go to jail in Georgia if you offer people waiting in a long line to vote a little water and a snack thanks to republicans in that state. Other republican controlled states may follow suit..Georgia governor signs sweeping election regulations into law. There are even restrictions on snacks...
How much water do you need for a five hour wait in the Georgia sun?Democrats believe Black people are to stupid to bring their own drinks and snacks.Well folks you can now go to jail in Georgia if you offer people waiting in a long line to vote a little water and a snack thanks to republicans in that state. Other republican controlled states may follow suit..Georgia governor signs sweeping election regulations into law. There are even restrictions on snacks...
And why the hell would anyone providing water to people waiting in those lines be committing a crime?
They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
One problem..nobody stold an election..That's the kind of blowback that can happen to corrupt assholes who steal elections. Anyone who refuses to present an ID is someone whose main goal is to cheat honest voters. That kind of scum needs to be called out and stopped.It will dramatically shorten runoff elections from nine weeks to less than a month
Fuck you GOP
The law will require mail-in voters to include their driver's license numbers or other documentation to verify their identities, instead of using signature verification.
Go fuck yourselves, GOP.
Also, no water while wait to buy a gunBlacks are going to die from dehydration and starvation while waiting in line to vote!
So some old guy getting thirsty while waiting in a long line to vote should just leave and go find an old tire??Well folks you can now go to jail in Georgia if you offer people waiting in a long line to vote a little water and a snack thanks to republicans in that state. Other republican controlled states may follow suit..Georgia governor signs sweeping election regulations into law. There are even restrictions on snacks...
Ha.
When I was a kid, I started whining about being thirsty. Grammaw said "should've gotten some before we left the house."
That was the end of it.
I find that old tires laying in vacant lots or on the side of the road typically have some water left in them.
it doesn't matter. A few years ago a business owner was fined because he gave gift certificates for coffee and a donut to employees who voted. However last state election in California democrats were giving smokes for votes to homeless people.They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
Who proposed that??Also, no water while wait to buy a gunBlacks are going to die from dehydration and starvation while waiting in line to vote!
Suck it up or bring a bottle of water with you.So some old guy getting thirsty while waiting in a long line to vote should just leave and go find an old tire??Well folks you can now go to jail in Georgia if you offer people waiting in a long line to vote a little water and a snack thanks to republicans in that state. Other republican controlled states may follow suit..Georgia governor signs sweeping election regulations into law. There are even restrictions on snacks...
Ha.
When I was a kid, I started whining about being thirsty. Grammaw said "should've gotten some before we left the house."
That was the end of it.
I find that old tires laying in vacant lots or on the side of the road typically have some water left in them.
As long as it just to vote and not to vote for a specific person I see no harm in any of that.it doesn't matter. A few years ago a business owner was fined because he gave gift certificates for coffee and a donut to employees who voted. However last state election in California democrats were giving smokes for votes to homeless people.They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
It is not starvation to fail to provide snacks and water.
The business owner engaged in a quid pro quo. Handing out water to people in line is not.it doesn't matter. A few years ago a business owner was fined because he gave gift certificates for coffee and a donut to employees who voted. However last state election in California democrats were giving smokes for votes to homeless people.They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
It is not starvation to fail to provide snacks and water.
So what if they forget or didn't think the line would be that long. Handing someone a bottle of water is now a crime. You people are unbelievable.Suck it up or bring a bottle of water with you.So some old guy getting thirsty while waiting in a long line to vote should just leave and go find an old tire??Well folks you can now go to jail in Georgia if you offer people waiting in a long line to vote a little water and a snack thanks to republicans in that state. Other republican controlled states may follow suit..Georgia governor signs sweeping election regulations into law. There are even restrictions on snacks...
Ha.
When I was a kid, I started whining about being thirsty. Grammaw said "should've gotten some before we left the house."
That was the end of it.
I find that old tires laying in vacant lots or on the side of the road typically have some water left in them.
No the business owner gave certificates to those who had already voted.The business owner engaged in a quid pro quo. Handing out water to people in line is not.it doesn't matter. A few years ago a business owner was fined because he gave gift certificates for coffee and a donut to employees who voted. However last state election in California democrats were giving smokes for votes to homeless people.They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
It is not starvation to fail to provide snacks and water.
So why make it illegal then??..it's just water.No the business owner gave certificates to those who had already voted.The business owner engaged in a quid pro quo. Handing out water to people in line is not.it doesn't matter. A few years ago a business owner was fined because he gave gift certificates for coffee and a donut to employees who voted. However last state election in California democrats were giving smokes for votes to homeless people.They’re already in line to vote. It’s not any sort of quid pro quo.Giving someone anything to vote is illegal. It's a simple concept.
It is not starvation to fail to provide snacks and water.
Democrats engage in quid pro quo.
No one has yet collapsed in a voting line from dehydration. Elections are in November. Heatstroke is not an issue.
