Midnight Marauder
Rookie
- Feb 28, 2009
- 12,404
- 1,939
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
I see you're attacking the source, rather than actually looking at what he said in the video there and then trying to dispute it.Sodapinhead, watch Lord Monckton use the IPCC's own numbers, watch him assume everything they say is correct, and watch him then use MATH on a blackboard to completely debunk this pseudoscience.
If you watch it, then have any problem at all with his math, let us all know.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OS4a4FQmiU8&feature=channel
Are you still quoting that old fraud?
Christopher Monckton - SourceWatch
This article is part of the Climate change portal on SourceWatch.
Christopher Monckton is the third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley and a former advisor to the policy unit of the British government during the 1980s. He is a climate skeptic and is employed as Chief Policy Adviser for the Science and Public Policy Institute.[1] He has had articles published in The Guardian, and the American Physical Society claiming that global warming is neither man-made nor likely to be catastrophic. His critics, including The Guardian writer George Monbiot, point out that Monckton has only a "degree in classics and a diploma in journalism and...no further qualifications." [2]
You realize you cannot dispute it, so here we are with appeal to ad-hom.
Again.
Exactly what you accuse others of doing.
Meanwhile, Monckton has proven the whole AGW theory a hoax, using the IPCC's own numbers.