God didn't make man; man made gods.

pacer

Silver Member
Sep 9, 2013
2,463
504
God didn't make man; man made gods

In recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "DNA."

By J. Anderson Thomson and Clare Aukofer

...

In recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "DNA." They have produced robust theories, backed by empirical evidence (including "imaging" studies of the brain at work), that support the conclusion that it was humans who created God, not the other way around. And the better we understand the science, the closer we can come to "no heaven … no hell … and no religion too."

Like our physiological DNA, the psychological mechanisms behind faith evolved over the eons through natural selection. They helped our ancestors work effectively in small groups and survive and reproduce, traits developed long before recorded history, from foundations deep in our mammalian, primate and African hunter-gatherer past.

For example, we are born with a powerful need for attachment, identified as long ago as the 1940s by psychiatrist John Bowlby and expanded on by psychologist Mary Ainsworth. Individual survival was enhanced by protectors, beginning with our mothers. Attachment is reinforced physiologically through brain chemistry, and we evolved and retain neural networks completely dedicated to it. We easily expand that inborn need for protectors to authority figures of any sort, including religious leaders and, more saliently, gods. God becomes a super parent, able to protect us and care for us even when our more corporeal support systems disappear, through death or distance.

Scientists have so far identified about 20 hard-wired, evolved "adaptations" as the building blocks of religion. Like attachment, they are mechanisms that underlie human interactions: Brain-imaging studies at the National Institutes of Health showed that when test subjects were read statements about religion and asked to agree or disagree, the same brain networks that process human social behavior — our ability to negotiate relationships with others — were engaged.

Among the psychological adaptations related to religion are our need for reciprocity, our tendency to attribute unknown events to human agency, our capacity for romantic love, our fierce "out-group" hatreds and just as fierce loyalties to the in groups of kin and allies. Religion hijacks these traits. The rivalry between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, for example, or the doctrinal battles between Protestant and Catholic reflect our "groupish" tendencies.

In addition to these adaptations, humans have developed the remarkable ability to think about what goes on in other people's minds and create and rehearse complex interactions with an unseen other. In our minds we can de-couple cognition from time, place and circumstance. We consider what someone else might do in our place; we project future scenarios; we replay past events. It's an easy jump to say, conversing with the dead or to conjuring gods and praying to them.

Morality, which some see as imposed by gods or religion on savage humans, science sees as yet another adaptive strategy handed down to us by natural selection.

Beyond psychological adaptations and mechanisms, scientists have discovered neurological explanations for what many interpret as evidence of divine existence. Canadian psychologist Michael Persinger, who developed what he calls a "god helmet" that blocks sight and sound but stimulates the brain's temporal lobe, notes that many of his helmeted research subjects reported feeling the presence of "another." Depending on their personal and cultural history, they then interpreted the sensed presence as either a supernatural or religious figure. It is conceivable that St. Paul's dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus was, in reality, a seizure caused by temporal lobe epilepsy.

The better we understand human psychology and neurology, the more we will uncover the underpinnings of religion. Some of them, like the attachment system, push us toward a belief in gods and make departing from it extraordinarily difficult. But it is possible.

We can be better as a species if we recognize religion as a man-made construct. We owe it to ourselves to at least consider the real roots of religious belief, so we can deal with life as it is, taking advantage of perhaps our mind's greatest adaptation: our ability to use reason.

Imagine that.

Science and religion: God didn't make man; man made gods - Los Angeles Times
 
If that is the case, then it is to man's credit to have created such as Jesus Christ and Buddha. Just sayin'.
 
Beyond psychological adaptations and mechanisms, scientists have discovered neurological explanations for what many interpret as evidence of divine existence. Canadian psychologist Michael Persinger, who developed what he calls a "god helmet" that blocks sight and sound but stimulates the brain's temporal lobe, notes that many of his helmeted research subjects reported feeling the presence of "another." Depending on their personal and cultural history, they then interpreted the sensed presence as either a supernatural or religious figure. It is conceivable that St. Paul's dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus was, in reality, a seizure caused by temporal lobe epilepsy.

The better we understand human psychology and neurology, the more we will uncover the underpinnings of religion. Some of them, like the attachment system, push us toward a belief in gods and make departing from it extraordinarily difficult. But it is possible.
This segment discussing the research with the "god helmet" is particularly interesting.
 
If that is the case, then it is to man's credit to have created such as Jesus Christ and Buddha. Just sayin'.
Jesus was a man and Buddha was a man. We can't take credit for their creation.
 
our tendency to attribute unknown events to human agency

bingo
 
If that is the case, then it is to man's credit to have created such as Jesus Christ and Buddha. Just sayin'.
Jesus was a man and Buddha was a man. We can't take credit for their creation.

But we can take credit for elevating them to God-like status.
So true and not only to elevating them to god-like status but as the article suggests to conjuring up gods and praying to them.
 
Okay geniuses, explain the "Big Bang"! Nothing comes from nothing for no reason.

I say, Oh wait, put the Bible on the shelf for now, pretend it doesn't exist.
Okay, God (for the lack of a better word) created Man and Man has been creating God in his (mans) image ever since.
now, argue with that! Makes more sense than coming from nothing, going nowhere, for no reason.

Where there's reason there's 'something'.
 
There is one "unknown event" of which we can be fairly certain, and upon which most agree: that at some point in time across the eons, the universe as we now know it possessed no physical attributes.

The moment at which that universe transitioned to its physical state was the catalyst that propelled our planet Earth, and its inhabitants, toward this moment in time.

Everything else is conjecture.
 
If that is the case, then it is to man's credit to have created such as Jesus Christ and Buddha. Just sayin'.
Jesus was a man and Buddha was a man. We can't take credit for their creation.

But we can take credit for elevating them to God-like status.

I don't know about Buddha, but Jesus, changed water into wine, cured the sick, calmed storms and brought the dead back to life. Certainly sounds like God to me.:eusa_whistle:
 
God didn't make man; man made gods

In recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "DNA."

By J. Anderson Thomson and Clare Aukofer

...

In recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "DNA." They have produced robust theories, backed by empirical evidence (including "imaging" studies of the brain at work), that support the conclusion that it was humans who created God, not the other way around. And the better we understand the science, the closer we can come to "no heaven … no hell … and no religion too."

Like our physiological DNA, the psychological mechanisms behind faith evolved over the eons through natural selection. They helped our ancestors work effectively in small groups and survive and reproduce, traits developed long before recorded history, from foundations deep in our mammalian, primate and African hunter-gatherer past.

For example, we are born with a powerful need for attachment, identified as long ago as the 1940s by psychiatrist John Bowlby and expanded on by psychologist Mary Ainsworth. Individual survival was enhanced by protectors, beginning with our mothers. Attachment is reinforced physiologically through brain chemistry, and we evolved and retain neural networks completely dedicated to it. We easily expand that inborn need for protectors to authority figures of any sort, including religious leaders and, more saliently, gods. God becomes a super parent, able to protect us and care for us even when our more corporeal support systems disappear, through death or distance.

Scientists have so far identified about 20 hard-wired, evolved "adaptations" as the building blocks of religion. Like attachment, they are mechanisms that underlie human interactions: Brain-imaging studies at the National Institutes of Health showed that when test subjects were read statements about religion and asked to agree or disagree, the same brain networks that process human social behavior — our ability to negotiate relationships with others — were engaged.

Among the psychological adaptations related to religion are our need for reciprocity, our tendency to attribute unknown events to human agency, our capacity for romantic love, our fierce "out-group" hatreds and just as fierce loyalties to the in groups of kin and allies. Religion hijacks these traits. The rivalry between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, for example, or the doctrinal battles between Protestant and Catholic reflect our "groupish" tendencies.

In addition to these adaptations, humans have developed the remarkable ability to think about what goes on in other people's minds and create and rehearse complex interactions with an unseen other. In our minds we can de-couple cognition from time, place and circumstance. We consider what someone else might do in our place; we project future scenarios; we replay past events. It's an easy jump to say, conversing with the dead or to conjuring gods and praying to them.

Morality, which some see as imposed by gods or religion on savage humans, science sees as yet another adaptive strategy handed down to us by natural selection.

Beyond psychological adaptations and mechanisms, scientists have discovered neurological explanations for what many interpret as evidence of divine existence. Canadian psychologist Michael Persinger, who developed what he calls a "god helmet" that blocks sight and sound but stimulates the brain's temporal lobe, notes that many of his helmeted research subjects reported feeling the presence of "another." Depending on their personal and cultural history, they then interpreted the sensed presence as either a supernatural or religious figure. It is conceivable that St. Paul's dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus was, in reality, a seizure caused by temporal lobe epilepsy.

The better we understand human psychology and neurology, the more we will uncover the underpinnings of religion. Some of them, like the attachment system, push us toward a belief in gods and make departing from it extraordinarily difficult. But it is possible.

We can be better as a species if we recognize religion as a man-made construct. We owe it to ourselves to at least consider the real roots of religious belief, so we can deal with life as it is, taking advantage of perhaps our mind's greatest adaptation: our ability to use reason.

Imagine that.

Science and religion: God didn't make man; man made gods - Los Angeles Times


Why do you believe this man versus someone else's theories ( educated guesses )?
 
This is not a question of believing a man with a theory. These are theories based on scientific research/studies. It brings us one step closer to possibly understanding or explaining some of the mysteries/phenomena of the bible. I found the article very interesting and felt it may be of interest to others.
 
Last edited:
Man exists. Call it gods or science, we do in fact exist. So something or someone or some natural occurence led to our existing. Instead of focusing on the terms, broaden the scope to allow for the possibility that G-d might well be the wrong answer to the 'how' and 'why' but not the wrong idea to such questions. Whether 'G-d' or 'nature' created us through natural processes, we were in fact created. But creation doesn't require conscious will unless you prefer to use such a term.
 
Okay geniuses, explain the "Big Bang"! Nothing comes from nothing for no reason.

I say, Oh wait, put the Bible on the shelf for now, pretend it doesn't exist.
Okay, God (for the lack of a better word) created Man and Man has been creating God in his (mans) image ever since.
now, argue with that! Makes more sense than coming from nothing, going nowhere, for no reason.

Where there's reason there's 'something'.
the big bang does not say something came from nothing ..however, the bible goes in to great detail about something from nothing..
just a thought...
 
Jesus was a man and Buddha was a man. We can't take credit for their creation.

But we can take credit for elevating them to God-like status.

I don't know about Buddha, but Jesus, changed water into wine, cured the sick, calmed storms and brought the dead back to life. Certainly sounds like God to me.:eusa_whistle:
false jesus is "credited" with doing those things but there is no actual evidence to prove he did.
the bible is anecdotal

Definition of anecdotal (adj)
Bing Dictionary
an·ec·dot·al[ ànnək dṓt'l ]
based on anecdotes or hearsay: consisting of or based on secondhand accounts rather than firsthand knowledge or experience or scientific investigation
of anecdotes: relating to anecdotes or in the form of anecdotes
not evidence...
 

Forum List

Back
Top