"Good People Must Be Dangerous People"...conservative outlet American Greatness calls for people to use "the 2nd Amendment" to strike fear in Antifa

this is considered a serious publication on the right

Nowhere in the article does it say Americans should use the 2nd Amendment to strike fear in those Communist assholes you mentioned.

Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE !!!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
this is considered a serious publication on the right

Nowhere in the article does it say Americans should use the 2nd Amendment to strike fear in those Communist assholes you mentioned.

Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE !!!
quoting directly from the article:

Fear is the only language the violent comprehend

The Second Amendment, after all, does not exist for the sake of protecting citizens’ right to go to a shooting range, to hunt, or to otherwise engage in gun-related games. It exists—and let’s be blunt—to protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.
 
this is considered a serious publication on the right

What evidence do you have that it's a "serious publication on the right"? I usually have more sources of information than people who consider themselves Republicans or Democrats, and I've never heard of it.
 
quoting directly from the article:

Fear is the only language the violent comprehend

The Second Amendment, after all, does not exist for the sake of protecting citizens’ right to go to a shooting range, to hunt, or to otherwise engage in gun-related games. It exists—and let’s be blunt—to protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.
So if you don't threaten them everything is good... Where is the problem?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
this is considered a serious publication on the right

What evidence do you have that it's a "serious publication on the right"? I usually have more sources of information than people who consider themselves Republicans or Democrats, and I've never heard of it.
Ann Coulter quotes it regularly...Ann is one of the most famous conservatives in the history of the world
 
this is considered a serious publication on the right

never heard of it,,,,

but in the light of clear and present threats that antifa and BLM have demonstrated, its clear the only solution is counter violence,, more so when the cops and government refuse to do their job,,
 
this is considered a serious publication on the right

Nowhere in the article does it say Americans should use the 2nd Amendment to strike fear in those Communist assholes you mentioned.

Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE !!!
quoting directly from the article:

Fear is the only language the violent comprehend

The Second Amendment, after all, does not exist for the sake of protecting citizens’ right to go to a shooting range, to hunt, or to otherwise engage in gun-related games. It exists—and let’s be blunt—to protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.
do you disagree with this??
if so why??
 
Ann Coulter quotes it regularly...Ann is one of the most famous conservatives in the history of the world
At least I know who she is... But... Damn she's a crack pot. I don't think that really helps your case. But... Alright.
 
quoting directly from the article:

Fear is the only language the violent comprehend

The Second Amendment, after all, does not exist for the sake of protecting citizens’ right to go to a shooting range, to hunt, or to otherwise engage in gun-related games. It exists—and let’s be blunt—to protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.
Neither of which, in context, states the calling for people to use "the 2nd Amendment" to strike fear in Antifa.

The article simply reiterates what our Founding Fathers knew the 2nd Amendment was actually for.


To protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.

Again ....

Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE !!!
 
""That America’s founders bequeathed to future generations the Second Amendment is all of the proof we need that they grasped the truth of this claim. And it is the Second Amendment, i.e. the codification of the right of all people to defend themselves against the violent, that they proposed as the solution for decent people. "
 
quoting directly from the article:

Fear is the only language the violent comprehend

The Second Amendment, after all, does not exist for the sake of protecting citizens’ right to go to a shooting range, to hunt, or to otherwise engage in gun-related games. It exists—and let’s be blunt—to protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.
Neither of which, in context, states the calling for people to use "the 2nd Amendment" to strike fear in Antifa.

The article simply reiterates what our Founding Fathers knew the 2nd Amendment was actually for.


To protect citizens’ right to kill those who would harm them and their own.

Again ....

Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE !!!
the folks who harm good citizens ARE Antifa

are you arguing Antifa are harmless?
 
That's why ANTIFA was started. To counter the violence on the right.
There was never any violence to be countered from the Right.

That is not why ANTIFA was started.

Your comment is more Leftist Bullshit and LIES !!!!
 
" Decent people, and decent men specifically, know that in the last analysis, it is they and they alone—and not, as those in Big Conservatism would have us think, state agents—who are the last line of defense protecting innocents from predators. This being the case, the decent know that they must become ruthless.

They must become the stuff of nightmares—but the nightmares of bad and dangerous people. The only thing necessary for bad men to triumph is for good men to do nothing, Burke memorably noted. Yet good men, as Jordan Peterson correctly observed, must be dangerous men. "
 
here's where he mentions Antifa

"Of course, nongovernmental actors also appeal to violence explicitly or implicitly in their interactions with other citizens. Black Lives Matter and Antifa are the most glaring recent illustrations of private actors using overt violence to impose a political agenda upon others, while the agents of “cancel culture” use violence more subtly. They apologize for and actually encourage the thuggery of their street counterparts by singling out dissidents for all manner of abuse.

Why? Simply put, these self-styled “antiracists” and “antifascists” know that they stand to gain material, moral, and political advantages from the white people they brand “white supremacists.” "
 

Forum List

Back
Top