Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #21
Well she's already half way to a totalitarian California. After all, with a sweep of her hand, she ordered county clerks there to violate intiative law and start issuing bogus gay marriage licenses. There is no California official who may refuse to uphold CA initiative law. It is the law in the interim no matter how many courts rule if it is clear it is on its way to the US Supreme Court for a final weigh. Which of course Prop 8 was. The High Court never ruled on the merits of Prop 8, they just refused to visit it altogether, but did Uphold Windsor which said gay marriage is/was state's choice until further notice.Matt McLaughlin has a goal but that goal has nothing to do with gays or the Bible. This time he has an attorney general that agrees with him and will work with him. McLaughlin has been bringing these nonsense initiatives for years. What he wants to do is end the initiative process completely. He makes his initiatives as odious as possible. How bad do they have to get before the state closes down the whole process.
Kamala Harris agrees. She has proposed raising the filing fee from $200 to $8000.
Last time I checked, California is a state.
Here's how Kamala Harris is guilty of sedition:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_3
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SEC. 3.5. An administrative agency, including an administrative
agency created by the Constitution or an initiative statute, has no
power:
(a) To declare a statute unenforceable, or refuse to enforce a
statute, on the basis of it being unconstitutional unless an
appellate court has made a determination that such statute is
unconstitutional;
(b) To declare a statute unconstitutional;
(c) To declare a statute unenforceable, or to refuse to enforce a
statute on the basis that federal law or federal regulations prohibit
the enforcement of such statute unless an appellate court has made a
determination that the enforcement of such statute is prohibited by
federal law or federal regulations.
The latest Finding of Constitutionality on the question of gay marriage was Windsor 2013. That Finding was that a state's discreet community is the determiner of whether or not gay marriage is legal until/unless further notice. Immediately after this Finding by the Highest Court in our country, Kamala Harris did wilfully perform sedition upon her state by using her office to order under threat, lowerling county clerks to disobey their oaths of Office to issue "marriage licenses" in direct conflict with statute law present to this day in the California Constitution which reads:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1
Here's how she can be removed from office immediately:CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or
recognized in California.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_7
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 7 PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
SEC. 9. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution,
no person or organization which advocates the overthrow of the
Government of the United States or the State by force or violence or
other unlawful means or who advocates the support of a foreign
government against the United States in the event of hostilities
shall:
a) Hold any office or employment under this State, including but
not limited to the University of California, or with any county, city
or county, city, district, political subdivision, authority, board,
bureau, commission or other public agency of this State
Last edited: