Greedy, crooked Clintons scam taxpayers out of $16 million

toomuchtime_

Gold Member
Dec 29, 2008
20,030
4,945
Bill Clinton's staff used a decades-old federal government program, originally created to keep former presidents out of the poorhouse, to subsidize his family’s foundation and an associated business, and to support his wife’s private email server, a POLITICO investigation has found.

Taxpayer cash was used to buy IT equipment — including servers — housed at the Clinton Foundation, and also to supplement the pay and benefits of several aides now at the center of the email and cash-for-access scandals dogging Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal. But it does offer fresh evidence of how the Clintons blurred the line between their nonprofit foundation, Hillary Clinton’s State Department, and the business dealings of Bill Clinton and the couple’s aides.

The thousands of pages of newly uncovered records reveal sometimes granular detail about how Bill Clinton’s representatives directed the spending of taxpayer cash allocated by the GSA under the Former President’s Act.

The Act authorizes the GSA to fund the pensions, correspondence, support staff and travel of ex-presidents. It was passed in 1958 to “maintain the dignity” of the presidency by helping former commanders in chief avoid hard times like those that befell Harry S. Truman. He complained that, without help from Uncle Sam, he would be forced to “go ahead with some contracts to keep ahead of the hounds.”

The Clintons did not have this problem.

After leaving the White House “dead broke”, in the words of Hillary Clinton, they quickly raked in tens of millions of dollars from book deals, speaking fees and consulting gigs. At the same time, Bill Clinton was relying on his connections to some of the world’s deepest-pocketed donors, corporations and governments to seed a global philanthropy operation that overlapped with his consulting work and speaking fees and his wife’s work as secretary of state — and served as a jumping-off point for her presidential campaign.

But even as the Clintons got rich and grew their foundation into a $2 billion organization credited with major victories in the fights against childhood obesity and AIDS — while paying six-figure salaries to top aides — Bill Clinton continued drawing more cash from the Former President's Act than any other ex-president, according to a POLITICO analysis. The analysis also found that Clinton’s representatives, between 2001, when the Clintons left the White House, and the end of this year, had requested allocations under the Act totaling $16 million. That’s more than any of the other living former presidents — Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush — requested during that span.

Bill Clinton aides used tax dollars to subsidize foundation, private email support

The Clintons remain a national disgrace.
 
Bill Clinton's staff used a decades-old federal government program, originally created to keep former presidents out of the poorhouse, to subsidize his family’s foundation and an associated business, and to support his wife’s private email server, a POLITICO investigation has found.

Taxpayer cash was used to buy IT equipment — including servers — housed at the Clinton Foundation, and also to supplement the pay and benefits of several aides now at the center of the email and cash-for-access scandals dogging Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal. But it does offer fresh evidence of how the Clintons blurred the line between their nonprofit foundation, Hillary Clinton’s State Department, and the business dealings of Bill Clinton and the couple’s aides.

The thousands of pages of newly uncovered records reveal sometimes granular detail about how Bill Clinton’s representatives directed the spending of taxpayer cash allocated by the GSA under the Former President’s Act.

The Act authorizes the GSA to fund the pensions, correspondence, support staff and travel of ex-presidents. It was passed in 1958 to “maintain the dignity” of the presidency by helping former commanders in chief avoid hard times like those that befell Harry S. Truman. He complained that, without help from Uncle Sam, he would be forced to “go ahead with some contracts to keep ahead of the hounds.”

The Clintons did not have this problem.

After leaving the White House “dead broke”, in the words of Hillary Clinton, they quickly raked in tens of millions of dollars from book deals, speaking fees and consulting gigs. At the same time, Bill Clinton was relying on his connections to some of the world’s deepest-pocketed donors, corporations and governments to seed a global philanthropy operation that overlapped with his consulting work and speaking fees and his wife’s work as secretary of state — and served as a jumping-off point for her presidential campaign.

But even as the Clintons got rich and grew their foundation into a $2 billion organization credited with major victories in the fights against childhood obesity and AIDS — while paying six-figure salaries to top aides — Bill Clinton continued drawing more cash from the Former President's Act than any other ex-president, according to a POLITICO analysis. The analysis also found that Clinton’s representatives, between 2001, when the Clintons left the White House, and the end of this year, had requested allocations under the Act totaling $16 million. That’s more than any of the other living former presidents — Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush — requested during that span.

Bill Clinton aides used tax dollars to subsidize foundation, private email support

The Clintons remain a national disgrace.

Libs attacking the source in 5....4.....3....2...
 
Perhaps someday we as a people will come to a point whereby we call out all corruption as opposed merely to the "other" side's.

Of course, the Clinton's are corrupt, your entire wsystem is.
 
Bill Clinton's staff used a decades-old federal government program, originally created to keep former presidents out of the poorhouse, to subsidize his family’s foundation and an associated business, and to support his wife’s private email server, a POLITICO investigation has found.

Taxpayer cash was used to buy IT equipment — including servers — housed at the Clinton Foundation, and also to supplement the pay and benefits of several aides now at the center of the email and cash-for-access scandals dogging Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal. But it does offer fresh evidence of how the Clintons blurred the line between their nonprofit foundation, Hillary Clinton’s State Department, and the business dealings of Bill Clinton and the couple’s aides.

The thousands of pages of newly uncovered records reveal sometimes granular detail about how Bill Clinton’s representatives directed the spending of taxpayer cash allocated by the GSA under the Former President’s Act.

The Act authorizes the GSA to fund the pensions, correspondence, support staff and travel of ex-presidents. It was passed in 1958 to “maintain the dignity” of the presidency by helping former commanders in chief avoid hard times like those that befell Harry S. Truman. He complained that, without help from Uncle Sam, he would be forced to “go ahead with some contracts to keep ahead of the hounds.”

The Clintons did not have this problem.

After leaving the White House “dead broke”, in the words of Hillary Clinton, they quickly raked in tens of millions of dollars from book deals, speaking fees and consulting gigs. At the same time, Bill Clinton was relying on his connections to some of the world’s deepest-pocketed donors, corporations and governments to seed a global philanthropy operation that overlapped with his consulting work and speaking fees and his wife’s work as secretary of state — and served as a jumping-off point for her presidential campaign.

But even as the Clintons got rich and grew their foundation into a $2 billion organization credited with major victories in the fights against childhood obesity and AIDS — while paying six-figure salaries to top aides — Bill Clinton continued drawing more cash from the Former President's Act than any other ex-president, according to a POLITICO analysis. The analysis also found that Clinton’s representatives, between 2001, when the Clintons left the White House, and the end of this year, had requested allocations under the Act totaling $16 million. That’s more than any of the other living former presidents — Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush — requested during that span.

Bill Clinton aides used tax dollars to subsidize foundation, private email support

The Clintons remain a national disgrace.


That is chump change compared to what the Bush and Clinton crime families have stolen not only from Americans but the rest of the world.,
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer

How about the 250 million dollars that Vince Foster picked up from Leo Wanta for the Clinton slush fund disguised as the Children's Defense Fund picked up in Geneva, Switzerland shortly before he was found with a bullet to the head? Are you familiar with the Bush and Clinton crime families that have gone after the 27.5 TRILLION dollars that was to be repatriated to the citizens of America per Ronald Reagan's request? I bet that you haven't the slightest clue about how the USSR was collapsed using currency swaps . Hitlery was also recorded going into the Bank of Crozier in Grenada to withdraw funds from one of the 6,000 banks holding this money using CIA credentials. It's stored on PROMIS software developed by Inslaw.INC whose proprietary rights to it was stolen by your beloved "gubermint" and then sold to other countries by a variety of alphabet agencies.

See? This is how your disgusting excuse for a "gubermint" rolls and this is how this corporate entity lives by their own rules and makes them up as they go. "Rules foir thee, but not for me".......anyone that would defend the Clintons OR the Bush's is an idiot....which explains why you are what you are.
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer

How about the 250 million dollars that Vince Foster picked up from Leo Wanta for the Clinton slush fund disguised as the Children's Defense Fund picked up in Geneva, Switzerland shortly before he was found with a bullet to the head? Are you familiar with the Bush and Clinton crime families that have gone after the 27.5 TRILLION dollars that was to be repatriated to the citizens of America per Ronald Reagan's request? I bet that you haven't the slightest clue about how the USSR was collapsed using currency swaps . Hitlery was also recorded going into the Bank of Crozier in Grenada to withdraw funds from one of the 6,000 banks holding this money using CIA credentials. It's stored on PROMIS software developed by Inslaw.INC whose proprietary rights to it was stolen by your beloved "gubermint" and then sold to other countries by a variety of alphabet agencies.

See? This is how your disgusting excuse for a "gubermint" rolls and this is how this corporate entity lives by their own rules and makes them up as they go. "Rules foir thee, but not for me".......anyone that would defend the Clintons OR the Bush's is an idiot....which explains why you are what you are.
Be gone nutjob
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer

How about the 250 million dollars that Vince Foster picked up from Leo Wanta for the Clinton slush fund disguised as the Children's Defense Fund picked up in Geneva, Switzerland shortly before he was found with a bullet to the head? Are you familiar with the Bush and Clinton crime families that have gone after the 27.5 TRILLION dollars that was to be repatriated to the citizens of America per Ronald Reagan's request? I bet that you haven't the slightest clue about how the USSR was collapsed using currency swaps . Hitlery was also recorded going into the Bank of Crozier in Grenada to withdraw funds from one of the 6,000 banks holding this money using CIA credentials. It's stored on PROMIS software developed by Inslaw.INC whose proprietary rights to it was stolen by your beloved "gubermint" and then sold to other countries by a variety of alphabet agencies.

See? This is how your disgusting excuse for a "gubermint" rolls and this is how this corporate entity lives by their own rules and makes them up as they go. "Rules foir thee, but not for me".......anyone that would defend the Clintons OR the Bush's is an idiot....which explains why you are what you are.
Be gone nutjob

$27 Trillion?

Are you sure the Clinton's didn't steal $27 Zillion?
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer
In other words, you believe anything that is technically legal or can be made to seem so, is also a moral or ethical thing to do.
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer

How about the 250 million dollars that Vince Foster picked up from Leo Wanta for the Clinton slush fund disguised as the Children's Defense Fund picked up in Geneva, Switzerland shortly before he was found with a bullet to the head? Are you familiar with the Bush and Clinton crime families that have gone after the 27.5 TRILLION dollars that was to be repatriated to the citizens of America per Ronald Reagan's request? I bet that you haven't the slightest clue about how the USSR was collapsed using currency swaps . Hitlery was also recorded going into the Bank of Crozier in Grenada to withdraw funds from one of the 6,000 banks holding this money using CIA credentials. It's stored on PROMIS software developed by Inslaw.INC whose proprietary rights to it was stolen by your beloved "gubermint" and then sold to other countries by a variety of alphabet agencies.

See? This is how your disgusting excuse for a "gubermint" rolls and this is how this corporate entity lives by their own rules and makes them up as they go. "Rules foir thee, but not for me".......anyone that would defend the Clintons OR the Bush's is an idiot....which explains why you are what you are.
Be gone nutjob


A simple Google search plugging in the name "Leo Wanta" would have given you a plethora of internet sites that verify of what I speak is true. I never said that the whole 27 trillion has been stolen but they have been whittling away at it while Wanta's case stays tied up in court. I know more than you and I prove it every time our paths cross and you can never refute anything I post...you get butt-hurt and lamely try to dismiss me....but the thing is that others read what I post which is something you can't prevent.

Hope this helps!!!
 
This investigation, which is based on records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not reveal anything illegal.


Thread killer
In other words, you believe anything that is technically legal or can be made to seem so, is also a moral or ethical thing to do.


When I was twelve and lived on the outskirts of Lubbock, we lived in a neighborhood that allowed people to raise their own chickens, cows...whatever. One time, our dog got out of the gate and killed twelve of our neighbor's chickens....he came running towards us and into the gate we had left open. Two minutes later the neighbor comes banging on the fence and came in and claimed our dog had killed his chickens...with blood and feathers all over his muzzle, we looked up and denied that our dog would ever do that. Does that not describe Rightwinger's denial to the proverbial "T"???
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top