Hack media and leftists STILL citing presidential polls with Trump losing after N.C. Dem losses.

[rightwinger]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

No, but it seem the MSM is trying to convince those like you that Trump has no path to victory and will lose in 2020...

Maybe MSM should calm it down on projecting a Trump loss... Wait, MSM must convince society Trump will lose so they will not stop...

Trump had a very difficult path to victory in 2016. It involved winning Florida and Ohio and then taking surprising wins in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin

It will be hard to duplicate in 2020

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

No, but it seem the MSM is trying to convince those like you that Trump has no path to victory and will lose in 2020...

Maybe MSM should calm it down on projecting a Trump loss... Wait, MSM must convince society Trump will lose so they will not stop...

Trump had a very difficult path to victory in 2016. It involved winning Florida and Ohio and then taking surprising wins in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin

It will be hard to duplicate in 2020

If the economy is sailing smoothly then I say he win...

Pelosi and Democrats need to watch themselves because Trump is setting them up...

The Canada-Mexici-U.S. trade deal is one he will use against them next year and if he strikes a deal with China and the House does nothing he will use it against them, and it could lead to him winning again...

 

[RDD_1210]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Which polls predicted a Dem victory in NC yesterday?

Your Google broken? Mine works for some odd reason.

LOL, The old "you need to research and find my evidence for me" routine.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Congressional polling has always been difficult. Why did you earlier today post a poll? Fucking hypocrite.

Because YOU asked for it. It was posted for no other reason than to pacify you. Then it was ignored because it wasn't "convenient" so blow it out your ass....

Dumbass

 

[busybee01]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Which polls predicted a Dem victory in NC yesterday?

Your Google broken? Mine works for some odd reason.

RCP has no polls for the Congressional race. That means there were no credible polls done.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Which polls predicted a Dem victory in NC yesterday?

Your Google broken? Mine works for some odd reason.

RCP has no polls for the Congressional race. That means there were no credible polls done.

Never said it was an RCP poll. Read the link bitch

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The "polls" had Dems winning in N.C. and they were once again CLEARLY wrong but the same people are on TV and radio citing polls that show Trump losing in 2020.

At this point it's a foregone conclusion that they MUST know polls are utterly useless so why cite what you know to be inaccurate day in and day out? Well, there is only one possible reason. To try to suppress voter turnout by implying that Trump has no chance so why bother to vote.

I expect that kind of dishonesty from politicians and many political hacks but has the media not caught on? They continue to bleed ratings because of their dishonesty which makes it clear that political propaganda > actual honest coverage.

Why do you never whine about the 50 threads a week by the Trump worshipers with polls proving that Trump is more popular than Jesus?

 

[busybee01]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Which polls predicted a Dem victory in NC yesterday?

Your Google broken? Mine works for some odd reason.

RCP has no polls for the Congressional race. That means there were no credible polls done.

Never said it was an RCP poll. Read the link bitch

If it didn't make it on the RCP then it was not a credible poll.

 

[rightwinger]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

No, but it seem the MSM is trying to convince those like you that Trump has no path to victory and will lose in 2020...

Maybe MSM should calm it down on projecting a Trump loss... Wait, MSM must convince society Trump will lose so they will not stop...

Trump had a very difficult path to victory in 2016. It involved winning Florida and Ohio and then taking surprising wins in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin

It will be hard to duplicate in 2020

If the economy is sailing smoothly then I say he win...

Pelosi and Democrats need to watch themselves because Trump is setting them up...

The Canada-Mexici-U.S. trade deal is one he will use against them next year and if he strikes a deal with China and the House does nothing he will use it against them, and it could lead to him winning again...

With this economy, most presidents would coast to an easy re-election

But this is Trump
He is his own worst enemy

 

[SAYIT]

Polls were wrong in 2016. Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY. If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

LOL ... the guy has 187,000 posts in 10 years!!! Of course he has major probs ... there's a boatload of shit wrong with RW.

 

[rightwinger]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Which polls predicted a Dem victory in NC yesterday?

Your Google broken? Mine works for some odd reason.

RCP has no polls for the Congressional race. That means there were no credible polls done.

Most major polls won’t cover Congressional races

 

[keepitreal]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Except the polls were not wrong in 2016.

The poll average was Hillary by 3.2% and she won the popular vote by 2.1%.

The only thing the polls give data on is the popular vote

Which is the problem with our presidential polling

Polling needs to be done extensively is key swing states to be relevant

Um, maybe polling more than 1,200 people
when over 120 MILLION people are voting, might help

 

[busybee01]

The "polls" had Dems winning in N.C. and they were once again CLEARLY wrong but the same people are on TV and radio citing polls that show Trump losing in 2020.

At this point it's a foregone conclusion that they MUST know polls are utterly useless so why cite what you know to be inaccurate day in and day out? Well, there is only one possible reason. To try to suppress voter turnout by implying that Trump has no chance so why bother to vote.

I expect that kind of dishonesty from politicians and many political hacks but has the media not caught on? They continue to bleed ratings because of their dishonesty which makes it clear that political propaganda > actual honest coverage.

The Washington Examiner got it right.

"But Bishop merely retained a congressional seat drawn by Republicans for Republicans. This close shave should serve as a serious warning to conservatives that 2020, up and down the ticket, will be a blood bath if things keep going like this. Southern suburbs are showing an increasing impatience with Trump's Republican Party, such that the GOP cannot bank on winning in states like North Carolina and Georgia.

Naturally, the Trump fan club praised the president, using Bishop's win as evidence that Republicans can take back the suburbs and the House next year. But the breakdown of votes paints a more dire picture. Bishop performed even better than usual in rural areas of the district. But his Democratic opponent, Dan McCready, even in losing by a greater margin than in last year's controversial race, pulled more votes from the suburbs than he did during 2018's blue wave.

This follows the trend that already cost Republicans the House and could spell doom in 2020. A party that wins rural areas without suburbs or cities is a party that's going to start losing everywhere.

Republicans aren't just performing poorly relative to the pre-Trump days of the Republican Party. They're performing terribly relative to Trump's election in 2016. Both the president and Mitt Romney carried the same district by 12 points. Three years after Trump's victory, Bishop, who based his entire campaign on Trump, won last night just by two points.

It's good news for Republicans that they kept this seat. It's terrifying for their political future how they won it."

You can gerrymander a congressional district but you cannot gerrymander a entire state. Republicans cannot lose cities and the suburbs and expect to win.


"

 

[HappyJoy]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

The polls were wrong YESTERDAY.

If you can't see a pattern here you have MAJOR problems

Congressional polling has always been difficult. Why did you earlier today post a poll? Fucking hypocrite.

Because YOU asked for it. It was posted for no other reason than to pacify you. Then it was ignored because it wasn't "convenient" so blow it out your ass....

Dumbass

I didn't ask you to post a poll.

 

[rightwinger]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Except the polls were not wrong in 2016.

The poll average was Hillary by 3.2% and she won the popular vote by 2.1%.

The only thing the polls give data on is the popular vote

Which is the problem with our presidential polling

Polling needs to be done extensively is key swing states to be relevant

Um, maybe polling more than 1,200 people
when over 120 MILLION people are voting, might help

It is called random statistical sampling

 

[keepitreal]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Except the polls were not wrong in 2016.

The poll average was Hillary by 3.2% and she won the popular vote by 2.1%.

The only thing the polls give data on is the popular vote

Which is the problem with our presidential polling

Polling needs to be done extensively is key swing states to be relevant

Um, maybe polling more than 1,200 people
when over 120 MILLION people are voting, might help

It is called random statistical sampling

Then polling doesn’t need to be extensively conducted
in swing states to be relevant...
random statistical sampling is sufficient

 

[busybee01]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Except the polls were not wrong in 2016.

The poll average was Hillary by 3.2% and she won the popular vote by 2.1%.

The only thing the polls give data on is the popular vote

Which is the problem with our presidential polling

Polling needs to be done extensively is key swing states to be relevant

Um, maybe polling more than 1,200 people
when over 120 MILLION people are voting, might help

The size of the poll has very little to do with it's accuracy. Here are some figures from the 2018 generic polling and the last polls.

Actual: Democrats +8.4
RCP Average: Democrats +7.3

The polls were off by 1.1 points and size had nothing to do with it. The biggest miss was Rasmussen and they sampled 2,500 people. They had Republicans up by 1. The closest were the ABC/Washington Post poll which had Democrats up by 8 with a sample size of 787 likely voters. and USA Today/Suffolk which had Democrats up by 8 as well and they sampled 1,000 likely voters. There were no polls taken of the NC race.

 

[Slade3200]

The "polls" had Dems winning in N.C. and they were once again CLEARLY wrong but the same people are on TV and radio citing polls that show Trump losing in 2020.

At this point it's a foregone conclusion that they MUST know polls are utterly useless so why cite what you know to be inaccurate day in and day out? Well, there is only one possible reason. To try to suppress voter turnout by implying that Trump has no chance so why bother to vote.

I expect that kind of dishonesty from politicians and many political hacks but has the media not caught on? They continue to bleed ratings because of their dishonesty which makes it clear that political propaganda > actual honest coverage.

Which “polls” are you talking about for the NC election? Got a link?

 

[keepitreal]

Polls were wrong in 2016

Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Except the polls were not wrong in 2016.

The poll average was Hillary by 3.2% and she won the popular vote by 2.1%.

The only thing the polls give data on is the popular vote

Which is the problem with our presidential polling

Polling needs to be done extensively is key swing states to be relevant

Um, maybe polling more than 1,200 people
when over 120 MILLION people are voting, might help

The size of the poll has very little to do with it's accuracy. Here are some figures from the 2018 generic polling and the last polls.

Actual: Democrats +8.4
RCP Average: Democrats +7.3

The polls were off by 1.1 points and size had nothing to do with it. The biggest miss was Rasmussen and they sampled 2,500 people. They had Republicans up by 1. The closest were the ABC/Washington Post poll which had Democrats up by 8 with a sample size of 787 likely voters. and USA Today/Suffolk which had Democrats up by 8 as well and they sampled 1,000 likely voters. There were no polls taken of the NC race.

I have no idea what any of that was

 

[toobfreak]

Polls were wrong in 2016 Are Republicans running on the assumption that polls are ALWAYS wrong and they have nothing to worry about

Is this the first time you've ever pointed out that polls are often wrong or only when they show Trump leading?