Harvard Study shows...the more guns in the hands of private citizens, the less criminal activity.

[koshergrl]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Journal of Law is one of the cites for the OP.

The pediatrician who was the author of the crap study that brain cited is a partisan elitist pig.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Oh.....I see. An 8-year-old study....The data they used is over 10 years old.

So if someone else from Harvard, that bastion of left wing liberal detritus, decides to publish a study that doesn't meet with your approval, what will you do then?

Gun Violence Series Part 1: The Efficacy of Gun Control Laws in Preventing Gun Violence – Domestic and International Models
FEBRUARY 16, 2015
"""Australia and California provide substantial and representative data clearly establishing that common sense gun control laws significantly decrease gun violence at a domestic and international level. This fact begs the question, is it time for the United States to reconsider historically entrenched attitudes and follow the lead of numerous international peers and a few enlightened states in implementing legal reform to save the lives of thousands of its citizens?""

Gun Violence Series Part 1: The Efficacy of Gun Control Laws in Preventing Gun Violence – Domestic and International Models

How about you post a study that looks at violent crime over all like the one in the OP instead of gun grabber propaganda?

Why don't you just follow the link and see it's the same source as the O/P: Harvard Law.

 

[Skylar]

"The popular assertion that the United States has the industrialized world’s highest murder rate, says the Harvard study, is a throwback to the Cold War when Russian murder rates were nearly four times higher than American rates. In a strategic disinformation campaign, the U.S. was painted worldwide as a gunslinging nightmare of street violence – far worse than what was going on in Russia. The line was repeated so many times that many believed it to be true. Now, many still do.
"Today violence continues in Russia – far worse than in the U.S. – although the Russian people remain virtually disarmed. “Similar murder rates also characterize the Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and various other now-independent European nations of the former U.S.S.R.,” note Kates and Mauser . Kates is a Yale-educated criminologist and constitutional lawyer. Dr. Mauser is a Canadian criminologist at Simon Fraser University with a Ph.D. from the University of California Irvine. “International evidence and comparisons have long been offered as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths. Unfortunately, such discussions are all too often been afflicted by misconceptions and factual error.”

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

So Canada with about 1/4 our gun ownership rate......has about 1/3 our murder rate.

Canada has far fewer high crime areas. Canada has far less issues with illegal drugs and drug trade.

So more guns means less crime....unless it doesn't.

 

[Dutch]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Journal of Law is one of the cites for the OP.

The pediatrician who was the author of the crap study that brain cited is a partisan elitist pig.

The Journal you are citing is a conservative and libertarian group associated to theFederalist society. Can't get any more partisan than that.

 

[OKTexas]

Oh.....I see. An 8-year-old study....The data they used is over 10 years old.

So if someone else from Harvard, that bastion of left wing liberal detritus, decides to publish a study that doesn't meet with your approval, what will you do then?

Gun Violence Series Part 1: The Efficacy of Gun Control Laws in Preventing Gun Violence – Domestic and International Models
FEBRUARY 16, 2015
"""Australia and California provide substantial and representative data clearly establishing that common sense gun control laws significantly decrease gun violence at a domestic and international level. This fact begs the question, is it time for the United States to reconsider historically entrenched attitudes and follow the lead of numerous international peers and a few enlightened states in implementing legal reform to save the lives of thousands of its citizens?""

Gun Violence Series Part 1: The Efficacy of Gun Control Laws in Preventing Gun Violence – Domestic and International Models

How about you post a study that looks at violent crime over all like the one in the OP instead of gun grabber propaganda?

Why don't you just follow the link and see it's the same source as the O/P: Harvard Law.

I did, it speaks only to gun violence, not over all crime like the one in the OP. The link in the OP showed how over all crime increased when guns were removed from private hands. You gun grabbers have tunnel vision and never look at the big picture, like guns being used defensively in the US 2 million times a year, what would our over all crime stats look like if those guns weren't there?

 

[midcan5]

It becomes impossible to comprehend the security guns give to the insecure. Any sane soul would see an armed society is an uncivilized society.

Add your red circle: Mass shootings since Sandy Hook, in one map

Jim Jefferies - Guns Are Not Protection - from BARE - Netflix Special

.

 

[Brain357]

Shocking. When people defend themselves, they're not as likely to be robbed, killed, raped, etc.

"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

Guns Don't Deter Crime, Study Finds

Your study is one guy on a mission.


My study pulls from a variety of sources: "...a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity. "


http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...Astonishing-Link.aspx?p=2#7XKOkJMLXrrirhBE.99

"We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime," said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Instead, we found the opposite."

It is a Harvard study. Yours was on a mission.

 

[koshergrl]

Shocking. When people defend themselves, they're not as likely to be robbed, killed, raped, etc.

"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

Guns Don't Deter Crime, Study Finds

Your study is one guy on a mission.


My study pulls from a variety of sources: "...a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity. "


http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...Astonishing-Link.aspx?p=2#7XKOkJMLXrrirhBE.99

"We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime," said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Instead, we found the opposite."

It is a Harvard study. Yours was on a mission also.

Mine is a Harvard study, too. One that cites a variety of other allegedly "objective" sources...the CDC, for example. Yours is just one lone pediatrician supposing.

 

[Dutch]

Shocking. When people defend themselves, they're not as likely to be robbed, killed, raped, etc.

"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

Guns Don't Deter Crime, Study Finds

Your study is one guy on a mission.


My study pulls from a variety of sources: "...a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity. "


http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...Astonishing-Link.aspx?p=2#7XKOkJMLXrrirhBE.99

"We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime," said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Instead, we found the opposite."

It is a Harvard study. Yours was on a mission also.

Mine is a Harvard study, too. One that cites a variety of other allegedly "objective" sources...the CDC, for example. Yours is just one lone pediatrician supposing.

No it's not a Harvard study, it's a conservative student organization.

 

[koshergrl]

Shocking. When people defend themselves, they're not as likely to be robbed, killed, raped, etc.

"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

Guns Don't Deter Crime, Study Finds

Your study is one guy on a mission.


My study pulls from a variety of sources: "...a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity. "


http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...Astonishing-Link.aspx?p=2#7XKOkJMLXrrirhBE.99

"We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime," said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Instead, we found the opposite."

It is a Harvard study. Yours was on a mission also.

Mine is a Harvard study, too. One that cites a variety of other allegedly "objective" sources...the CDC, for example. Yours is just one lone pediatrician supposing.

No it's not a Harvard study, it's a conservative student organization.

Harvard published it.
"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#pZdvFwHmyM1Iuier.99

 

[The Rabbi]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So you'll have no trouble pointing out the flaws in their data, methodology or arguments. Right?

LOL! I'm kidding of course. You couldnt do that any more than you could play the violin with your toes. You just dont like the article so smear the source. Typical.

 

[Skylar]

Serbia with about half the number of guns per citizen has about 1/4 our murder rate.

Switzerland with about 1/3 the number of guns per citizen as we have has about 1/8th the murder rate.

New Zealand has about 1/5th the number of guns per citizen....and about 1/5th the murder rate.

 

[koshergrl]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So you'll have no trouble pointing out the flaws in their data, methodology or arguments. Right?

LOL! I'm kidding of course. You couldnt do that any more than you could play the violin with your toes. You just dont like the article so smear the source. Typical.

Harvard is the source, lol.

 

[Dutch]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So you'll have no trouble pointing out the flaws in their data, methodology or arguments. Right?

LOL! I'm kidding of course. You couldnt do that any more than you could play the violin with your toes. You just dont like the article so smear the source. Typical.

Harvard is the source, lol.

Are you dense? The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student group. Harvard University has no control over what they put out.

 

[The Rabbi]

And watch them show up with all their partisan *studies*...

Partisan??
The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student-edited law review of conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. It was established by Harvard Law School students Spencer Abraham and Stephen Eberhard in 1978, leading to the founding of the Federalist Society, for which it is the official journal.

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So you'll have no trouble pointing out the flaws in their data, methodology or arguments. Right?

LOL! I'm kidding of course. You couldnt do that any more than you could play the violin with your toes. You just dont like the article so smear the source. Typical.

Harvard is the source, lol.

Are you dense? The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy is a student group. Harvard University has no control over what they put out.

So you can easily point out the flaws and errors in the study, right?

LOL! Of course not! You couldnt point out anything because you're a dum-dum.

 

[Rustic]

Shocking. When people defend themselves, they're not as likely to be robbed, killed, raped, etc.

"According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
"In other words, more firearms, less crime, concludes the virtually unpublicized research report by attorney Don B. Kates and Dr. Gary Mauser. But the key is firearms in the hands of private citizens."

http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Artic...als-Astonishing-Link.aspx#jDdIsQzLPs2JuGVp.99

Buy more guns and ammo...

 

[koshergrl]

Waiting for the lefty gun grabbers to point out what is incorrect in the OP.

 

[gipper]

History clearly informs what happens when government has all the guns, and it ain't pretty.