Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You in public office are fundamentally dishonest people. You lead lives of deception at every turn, structuring your lives as comfortably as you can while governing with an indifference and arrogance that is absolutely maddening. When the country is reeling from financial disaster, you waste a trillion dollars on a health care bill we can't afford and you've never read. You claim it's critical because health care costs are killing this country... no they're not, you are! You are killing this country. You endorse the ongoing slaughter of millions of unborn children and whine when terrorists are water boarded. You can't lecture us right in Newtown High School about not doing enough to keep our children safe, while simultaneously slaughtering the unborn. You fabricate the intense, media laden drama of the fiscal cliff and lack the courage to do anything about truly reforming the obscene gluttony of government. You know you'll be out of office before the bill comes due you don't care and have no integrity nor honor.
You lie whenever and wherever you need to to move forth your agenda. Were you able, you would purge the US of guns every last gun in the country, if you could. So please forgive Wayne LaPierre and those of us who don't trust you as far as we can spit. You're a dishonest lot, motivated by a distorted worldview. If mass murder prevention were truly your goal, you would welcome armed security wherever needed. It is outrageous that we protect our money with far more firepower than we protect our children.
Thanks for addressing the most salient points she made. Your trite dismissal of the entire letter based on your opinion of such a small part of it is indicative of the liberal mindset. Shallow, to say the least. Congratulations for graduating from kindergarten....if you did!The dipshit lost me at "whine when terrorists are water boarded".
Until the UnConservatives and the GOP recant this totalitarian "ends justifies the means" sadistic love affair with torture, I will continue to kick them in the balls every opportunity I get.
And I will continue to stay home on Election Day after being a lifelong Republican voter.
These fuckers DESERVE a fucktard like Obama as their President. They worked very hard to ensure his victory with shit like this.
Thanks for addressing the most salient points she made. Your trite dismissal of the entire letter based on your opinion of such a small part of it is indicative of the liberal mindset. Shallow, to say the least. Congratulations for graduating from kindergarten....if you did!The dipshit lost me at "whine when terrorists are water boarded".
Until the UnConservatives and the GOP recant this totalitarian "ends justifies the means" sadistic love affair with torture, I will continue to kick them in the balls every opportunity I get.
And I will continue to stay home on Election Day after being a lifelong Republican voter.
These fuckers DESERVE a fucktard like Obama as their President. They worked very hard to ensure his victory with shit like this.
From the two central features of every collectivist system, the need for a commonly accepted system of ends of the group and the all-overriding desire to give to the group the maximum of power to achieve these ends grows a definite system of morals, which on some points coincides and on others violently contrasts with ours—but differs from it in one point which makes it doubtful whether we can call it morals: that it does not leave the individual conscience free to apply its own rules and does not even know any general rules which the individual is required or allowed to observe in all circumstances. This makes collectivist morals so different from what we have known as morals that we find it difficult to discover any principle in them, which they nevertheless possess.
The difference of principle is very much the same as that which we have already considered in connection with the Rule of Law. Like formal law, the rules of individualist ethics, however unprecise they may be in many respects, are general and absolute; they prescribe or prohibit a general type of action irrespective of whether in the particular instance the ultimate purpose is good or bad. To cheat or steal, to torture or betray a confidence, is held to be bad, irrespective of whether or not in the particular instance any harm follows from it. Neither the fact that in a given instance nobody may be the worse for it, nor any high purpose for which such an act may have been committed, can alter the fact that it is bad. Though we may sometimes be forced to choose between different evils, they remain evils.
The principle that the end justifies the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the denial of all morals. In collectivist ethics it becomes necessarily the supreme rule; there is literally nothing which the consistent collectivist must not be prepared to do if it serves “the good of the whole,” because the “good of the whole” is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done. The raison d’état, in which collectivist ethics has found its most explicit formulation, knows no other limit than that set by expediency—the suitability of the particular act for the end in view. And what the raison d’état affirms with respect to the relations between different countries applies equally to the relations between different individuals within the collectivist state. There can be no limit to what its citizen must be prepared to do, no act which his conscience must prevent him from committing, if it is necessary for an end which the community has set itself or which his superiors order him to achieve.
Thanks for addressing the most salient points she made. Your trite dismissal of the entire letter based on your opinion of such a small part of it is indicative of the liberal mindset. Shallow, to say the least. Congratulations for graduating from kindergarten....if you did!The dipshit lost me at "whine when terrorists are water boarded".
Until the UnConservatives and the GOP recant this totalitarian "ends justifies the means" sadistic love affair with torture, I will continue to kick them in the balls every opportunity I get.
And I will continue to stay home on Election Day after being a lifelong Republican voter.
These fuckers DESERVE a fucktard like Obama as their President. They worked very hard to ensure his victory with shit like this.
How revealing you feel an objection to torture is "trite".
Here's a kick in the balls, you UnConservative piece of shit:
From the two central features of every collectivist system, the need for a commonly accepted system of ends of the group and the all-overriding desire to give to the group the maximum of power to achieve these ends grows a definite system of morals, which on some points coincides and on others violently contrasts with oursbut differs from it in one point which makes it doubtful whether we can call it morals: that it does not leave the individual conscience free to apply its own rules and does not even know any general rules which the individual is required or allowed to observe in all circumstances. This makes collectivist morals so different from what we have known as morals that we find it difficult to discover any principle in them, which they nevertheless possess.
The difference of principle is very much the same as that which we have already considered in connection with the Rule of Law. Like formal law, the rules of individualist ethics, however unprecise they may be in many respects, are general and absolute; they prescribe or prohibit a general type of action irrespective of whether in the particular instance the ultimate purpose is good or bad. To cheat or steal, to torture or betray a confidence, is held to be bad, irrespective of whether or not in the particular instance any harm follows from it. Neither the fact that in a given instance nobody may be the worse for it, nor any high purpose for which such an act may have been committed, can alter the fact that it is bad. Though we may sometimes be forced to choose between different evils, they remain evils.
The principle that the end justifies the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the denial of all morals. In collectivist ethics it becomes necessarily the supreme rule; there is literally nothing which the consistent collectivist must not be prepared to do if it serves the good of the whole, because the good of the whole is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done. The raison détat, in which collectivist ethics has found its most explicit formulation, knows no other limit than that set by expediencythe suitability of the particular act for the end in view. And what the raison détat affirms with respect to the relations between different countries applies equally to the relations between different individuals within the collectivist state. There can be no limit to what its citizen must be prepared to do, no act which his conscience must prevent him from committing, if it is necessary for an end which the community has set itself or which his superiors order him to achieve.
The Road to Serfdom
Fucking circus?? You bet and its full of clowns. The folks we have elected to represent us. These folks have made a damned cushy life for themselves at our expense.
They have perks most folks would kill their mothers for. All at our expense. Perks that most folks don't come close to getting.
They spend our tax dollars like money grows on a tree all the while telling us its in our best interest.
They saddled us with SS, Medicare and the ACA. The ACA they passed, the Dems that is, without even reading the damned thing. Its supposed to be cheaper and better.
Anyone who believes that is in for a rude awakening. Nothing the Govt sticks its big fat nose in is ever cheaper or better.
Circus? That about sums it up. To bad we taxpayers are stuck footing the bills.
