Hillary Clinton: Qualifications to be President

[Statistikhengst]

In fact, in spite of the fact that Hillary will not win quite the landslide of a Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, LBJ or FDR, she will probably be the first president-elect to have gotten the most electoral bang for the buck since William McKinley. Those who know their electoral history know what I mean. I don't expect Rrrrraging Rrrrrrighties to grasp this. Rrrrrighties, go back to your Tonka toys. Thanks.

Well, that was stupid of you. Shows how little you know about the legislative branch. She personally sponsored 711 pieces of legislation and HELPED to WORK ON the others, making a massive total of +3,300 pieces of legislation. So, no, she didn't just sponsor other peoples' work. Good Lord, are you REALLY that daft? Plus, she is one of the only freshmen Senators ever to get some of those choice committee assignments, it is no small deal.

We have not even started on her tenure as Secretary of State, but that will be harder, since most of her acclaim will come out in 100 years or so when secret files will be opened. Who knows what kind of catastrophes she averted as SOS, burt I am sure she put out a number of political and military forest fires. She was unbelievably loved and respected there, FAR MORE than Colin Powell (whom I liked) and Condoleeza Rice (whom I also liked).

Hillary Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next POTUS. No Republican can even get close to her.

Signing your name to a piece of legislation doesn't really mean much doesn't it? and maybe you can help us where others have failed even Hillary herself..

Before you make any more of an utter blithering fool of yourself, you should read the legislation that she wrote. I already provided the links. Go to them, if you are smart enough.

Which party is engaging in the "war on women"? Hint: it ain't Democrats/Liberals - it's deranged NaziCons!

Which party will vote for one because of gender? You voted black now you get your chance to vote vagina.

You really must be hurting....that butt hurt is showing right through.........so sorry, must suck to be you and know your party can't even come up with a decent candidate that has a chance at beating Hillary........and, call her whatever you want, she will still be your next President.........oh, and you sound like a jr. high kid, using those kinds of slurs.......but I know you're probably an old white male, the ones that are really butt hurt that a Liberal "woman" will beat any of your conservative/Tea Party "men" at the next election.

"butthurt" who's the kid? and Hillary may not even run if she does it surely is not going to be any kind of cakewalk. If you think so you're delusional really

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

 

[Conservative65]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

No. I don't base my membership on a prediction or on your PMS. Plus, there is a very good possibility that she goes OVER 57%.

What you are recommending is juvenile, exactly what I expect from Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties.

So you say something will happen yet won't bet on it. While Hillary may have one, you're the real pussy.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

No. I don't base my membership on a prediction or on your PMS.

Ah.... so you ARE just a bigoted coward.
I thought so, I just needed proof.
Thank you.

 

[Mertex]

=
Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Sounds like someone is really butt hurting and wanting Stat to be gone........because he keeps posting things that hurt your weetle ego.....why don't you bet your USMB membership on the fact that she'll win..........are you willing to do that?

 

[rightwinger]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Cool

Conservatives offering lifetime ban bets on the election
That worked out so well last time with none of them failing to welch

Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice, um....um.....won't get fooled again

 

[Jroc]

Signing your name to a piece of legislation doesn't really mean much doesn't it? and maybe you can help us where others have failed even Hillary herself..

Before you make any more of an utter blithering fool of yourself, you should read the legislation that she wrote. I already provided the links. Go to them, if you are smart enough.

Which party will vote for one because of gender? You voted black now you get your chance to vote vagina.

You really must be hurting....that butt hurt is showing right through.........so sorry, must suck to be you and know your party can't even come up with a decent candidate that has a chance at beating Hillary........and, call her whatever you want, she will still be your next President.........oh, and you sound like a jr. high kid, using those kinds of slurs.......but I know you're probably an old white male, the ones that are really butt hurt that a Liberal "woman" will beat any of your conservative/Tea Party "men" at the next election.

"butthurt" who's the kid? and Hillary may not even run if she does it surely is not going to be any kind of cakewalk. If you think so you're delusional really

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

 

[Statistikhengst]

Since when is electability a qualification? That's just stupid.

It has always been the primary qualification

In fact, in spite of the fact that Hillary will not win quite the landslide of a Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, LBJ or FDR, she will probably be the first president-elect to have gotten the most electoral bang for the buck since William McKinley. Those who know their electoral history know what I mean. I don't expect Rrrrraging Rrrrrrighties to grasp this. Rrrrrighties, go back to your Tonka toys. Thanks.

OK.

In 2001-2002, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 656 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 656, 161 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


In 2003-2004, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 826 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


Of those 826, 138 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

So, during George W. Bush 43's first term in office, Clinton was part of 1,482 pieces of legislation, 297 of which were directly sponsored by her.

In 2005-2006, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 895 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 895, 175 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

In 2007-2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 991 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 991, 235 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

And in 2009. the last 19 days of the Bush 43 congress, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 19, 2 were directly sponsored by her, even after the election of Barack Obama (D-IL) as our 44th POTUS and shortly before his inauguration:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


GRAND TOTAL, for Hillary Clinton's 8 years as Senator from the great state of New York, she sponsored or co-sponsored 3,387 (THREE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED and EIGHTY SEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 3,387 pieces of legislation, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton directly sponsored (meaning, she was the initiator) 711 (SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

711 / 3,387 = 20.99% (21%) of all all of the legislation that had her name on it had her name as the main-sponsor.


Committee Assignments:

United States Senate career of Hillary Rodham Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Clinton served on five Senate committees with nine subcommittee assignments:

• Committee on the Budget (2001-2003)[1]
• Committee on Armed Services (2003-2009)[2]
  • Subcommittee on Airland
  • Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities
  • Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support
• Committee on Environment and Public Works (2001-2009)[1]
  • Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety
  • Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure
  • Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health (Chairwoman, 2007-2009)
• Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (2001-2009)[1]
  • Subcommittee on Children and Families
  • Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety
• Special Committee on Aging.[3]

She was also a Commissioner of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe[4] (2001-2009).[5]

She also held two leadership positions in the Senate Democratic Caucus:

1. Chairwoman of Steering and Outreach Committee (2003–2006)[6][7]
2. Vice Chairwoman of Committee Outreach (2007–2009)[8]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can click at the links to see EXACTLY what the legislation was. There was a ton of it.

Hillary Clinton was quite a workhorse in the US- Senate. Even her Republican colleagues were forced to admit this. She was also one of the most-in-attendance Senators in the US Senate during those 8 years and when she was not there, until the 2008 primaries, was in her home state of New York, bringing the issues to the residents of her state, which is what a Senator is supposed to do.


That is her record. People who think that she did nothing of consequence in the US Senate are total blithering idiots. They, like Westwall, are the fuckwads who are going to be completely rolled over by Steamroller Clinton in 2016.


And, just for shits and grins:

Let's compare her work record to Jim DeMint, who was also elected to two terms (did not completely serve out his second term) from 2005-2013:

Jim DeMint Congress.gov Library of Congress

His TOTAL legislation over 7.5 years: 2,032 total pieces of legislation that he sponsored or co-sponsored. Of that 2,032, Jim DeMint directly sponsored 753 piece of legislation. He directly sponsored slightly more legislation than Clinton, but his overall work record was decidedly less. Plus, she did this on top of running for President in 2008.

Any Republican out there know EXACTLY what Jim DeMint sponsored, by name?

Chuckle, chuckle.

Thank you. After 36 pages somebody finally posted something up we can look at. But seriously. That's it? 12 years and that's it? I see a lot of sponsoring of other peoples work. I don't see much of what SHE did.

Well, that was stupid of you. Shows how little you know about the legislative branch. She personally sponsored 711 pieces of legislation and HELPED to WORK ON the others, making a massive total of +3,300 pieces of legislation. So, no, she didn't just sponsor other peoples' work. Good Lord, are you REALLY that daft? Plus, she is one of the only freshmen Senators ever to get some of those choice committee assignments, it is no small deal.

We have not even started on her tenure as Secretary of State, but that will be harder, since most of her acclaim will come out in 100 years or so when secret files will be opened. Who knows what kind of catastrophes she averted as SOS, burt I am sure she put out a number of political and military forest fires. She was unbelievably loved and respected there, FAR MORE than Colin Powell (whom I liked) and Condoleeza Rice (whom I also liked).

Hillary Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next POTUS. No Republican can even get close to her.

Signing your name to a piece of legislation doesn't really mean much doesn't it? and maybe you can help us where others have failed even Hillary herself..

Before you make any more of an utter blithering fool of yourself, you should read the legislation that she wrote. I already provided the links. Go to them, if you are smart enough.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.

A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.

Which party is engaging in the "war on women"? Hint: it ain't Democrats/Liberals - it's deranged NaziCons!

Which party will vote for one because of gender? You voted black now you get your chance to vote vagina.

You really must be hurting....that butt hurt is showing right through.........so sorry, must suck to be you and know your party can't even come up with a decent candidate that has a chance at beating Hillary........and, call her whatever you want, she will still be your next President.........oh, and you sound like a jr. high kid, using those kinds of slurs.......but I know you're probably an old white male, the ones that are really butt hurt that a Liberal "woman" will beat any of your conservative/Tea Party "men" at the next election.

"butthurt" who's the kid? and Hillary may not even run. if she does it's surely is not going to be any kind of cakewalk. If you think so, you're delusional really

Bwahahaha, dude thinks Hillary is not going to run.

 

[Mertex]

Which party will vote for one because of gender? You voted black now you get your chance to vote vagina.

You really must be hurting....that butt hurt is showing right through.........so sorry, must suck to be you and know your party can't even come up with a decent candidate that has a chance at beating Hillary........and, call her whatever you want, she will still be your next President.........oh, and you sound like a jr. high kid, using those kinds of slurs.......but I know you're probably an old white male, the ones that are really butt hurt that a Liberal "woman" will beat any of your conservative/Tea Party "men" at the next election.

Clinton retains the Obama coalition for 2008 and 2012, plus she doubles the margin in the female vote and makes inroads in the rural vote, which is what polling internals from beaucoup polls is showing.

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.

Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Interesting you provide numbers for something that hasn't taken place.

No surprise she maintains that coalition. People like you voted Obama due to race. Why wouldn't you vote Hillary due to sex organ. It's how your kind operate. Pick a cause not a qualified person. In 2020, after Hillary doesn't win, what's next for you guys, a wetback.

That's what polling does. Are you really that ignorant? And do you think the GOP statisticians are not looking at this data?

LOL....

Polling provides predictions but aren't results.

Yeah, that's what Carl Rove and Megan Kelly (Faux News) wanted to believe in the 2012 election...........and what happened?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Before you make any more of an utter blithering fool of yourself, you should read the legislation that she wrote. I already provided the links. Go to them, if you are smart enough.

You really must be hurting....that butt hurt is showing right through.........so sorry, must suck to be you and know your party can't even come up with a decent candidate that has a chance at beating Hillary........and, call her whatever you want, she will still be your next President.........oh, and you sound like a jr. high kid, using those kinds of slurs.......but I know you're probably an old white male, the ones that are really butt hurt that a Liberal "woman" will beat any of your conservative/Tea Party "men" at the next election.

"butthurt" who's the kid? and Hillary may not even run if she does it surely is not going to be any kind of cakewalk. If you think so you're delusional really

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

 

[M14 Shooter]

=
Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Sounds like someone is really butt hurting and wanting Stat to be gone

To you, yes.
To rational, thinking people... well, that's different.
How about you? Willing to bet your USMB membership on Hillary's 57%?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

No. I don't base my membership on a prediction or on your PMS.

Ah.... so you ARE just a bigoted coward.
I thought so, I just needed proof.
Thank you.

No. I don't bet. It's not my thing. Plus, I don't want to embarrass you.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Cool

Conservatives offering lifetime ban bets on the election
That worked out so well last time with none of them failing to welch

Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice, um....um.....won't get fooled again

I tried to save him the embarrassment of that one.
You know how tender Conservatives are.

 

[Jroc]

"butthurt" who's the kid? and Hillary may not even run if she does it surely is not going to be any kind of cakewalk. If you think so you're delusional really

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

Sorry i just wanted to know what the "great" Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

Sorry i just wanted to know what the "great" Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State

So start a thread? That's not the topic now is it?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

No. I don't base my membership on a prediction or on your PMS.

Ah.... so you ARE just a bigoted coward.
I thought so, I just needed proof.
Thank you.

No. I don't bet. It's not my thing.

I already thanked you for proving you're just a bigoted coward - I shan't do it again.
Run along now.

 

[Statistikhengst]

He's a neo Nazi pretending to be a jew. How much more delusional can you get?

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

Sorry i just wanted to know what the "great" Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State

I started with her work-record as a US-Senator, twice elected in sweeping landslides (2000, 2006).

Hillary Clinton Qualifications to be President Page 11 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


Once you have absorbed the material, then I may bless you with some knowledge ..of her work as SOS.,

 

[Mertex]

=
Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Sounds like someone is really butt hurting and wanting Stat to be gone

To you, yes.
To rational, thinking people... well, that's different.
How about you? Willing to bet your USMB membership on Hillary's 57%?

I don't bet........but since you do, why don't you bet that she won't win? Bet your USMB membership that she'll lose?

 

[rightwinger]

Obama won in 2008 with 52.87% of the NPV. Double the margin of the female vote, lose some of the GOP crossover vote from 2008, add 3% to the rural vote and Hillary comes in right around 57%, which I have predicted at least 7 times in USMB now. And I am bookmarking this prediction every time.
Hillary: 2016 --- 57%.

Care to bet your USMB membership on that?
That is, if Hillary does not take 57% or more of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential race, you'll have the administrators ban your account, you'll leave USMB, and you'll never come back?

Cool

Conservatives offering lifetime ban bets on the election
That worked out so well last time with none of them failing to welch

Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice, um....um.....won't get fooled again

I tried to save him the embarrassment of that one.
You know how tender Conservatives are.

Tender? I don't know

What I do know is that it was conservatives who offered up the bets and conservatives who universally welched on their bets

The party of personal responsibility

 

[Jroc]

Nah..... He's just got the liberal hero worship thing going on... Embarrassing really

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

Sorry i just wanted to know what the "great" Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State

So start a thread? That's not the topic now is it?

Secretary of State is the highest profile position she has had outside of her husband. There must be many accomplishments to list which would enhance her presidential qualifications

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So, you didn't read the links and you have nothing to offer except to accuse someone of hero worship.

Fun!

Really sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation written by staffers doesn't mean anything. What did she accomplish as secretary of State? Did she fight for women's rights? Did she speak out against the slaughter of Christians in the middle east? What were her accomplishments? it's a simple question

You seem to be missing the point here, which is it doesn't fucking matter. Can she get elected is what matters, and that's true for everyone who runs. That's it. Clear now?

Sorry i just wanted to know what the "great" Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State

So start a thread? That's not the topic now is it?

Secretary of State is the highest profile position she has had outside of her husband. There must be many accomplishments to list which would enhance her presidential qualifications

Again, she only needs one qualification here - Can She Win? That's it.