House Resolution calls for National Day of Shame

He was awarded the prize under Affirmative Action rules....


lol....the way people fawn over this guy as if he is the savior of the world is really disturbing....this guy is not even in office 9 full months yet.....please somebody list all his great accomplishments......educate me will you????:confused:

He brought hope and change to millions and reached out to the Muslim world. Don't you read the papers?

I now declare as a Jew that I want to reach out and embrace my Muslim brothers.
Where's my prize??



The prize would be: PEACE!!!!!! Is that some sort of totally alien and unfathomable concept for you????:
 
He brought hope and change to millions and reached out to the Muslim world. Don't you read the papers?

silly me.....what was I thinking...lol....

btw.....I love your avatar!!!!:clap2:
 
KABUL: A Taliban spokesman in Afghanistan has condemned President Barack Obama's winning of the Nobel Peace Prize, saying the American president had only escalated the war by sending more troops.

Qari Yousef Ahmadi accused Obama ``of having the blood of the Afghan people on his hands.''

Ahmadi said in a telephone interview Friday from an undisclosed location: ``Why are they giving this prize to Obama, who has sent more troops to Afghanistan, who is bombing and killing innocent people?''

Obama ordered 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan earlier this year and is debating a request from his top commanders to send 40,000 more.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/Afghan-Taliban-condemn-Obamas-winning-Nobel-/articleshow/5106879.cms
:eusa_whistle:
 
KABUL: A Taliban spokesman in Afghanistan has condemned President Barack Obama's winning of the Nobel Peace Prize, saying the American president had only escalated the war by sending more troops.

Qari Yousef Ahmadi accused Obama ``of having the blood of the Afghan people on his hands.''

Ahmadi said in a telephone interview Friday from an undisclosed location: ``Why are they giving this prize to Obama, who has sent more troops to Afghanistan, who is bombing and killing innocent people?''

Obama ordered 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan earlier this year and is debating a request from his top commanders to send 40,000 more.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/Afghan-Taliban-condemn-Obamas-winning-Nobel-/articleshow/5106879.cms
:eusa_whistle:

Hmmmm......Taliban AND Conservatives condemning Obama's winning the Nobel!
 
October 9, 2009 - Reacting to the news this morning ***t President Barak Hussein Obama was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace, Republicans on the hill reacted quickly by introducing a resolution calling for a National Day of Shame.

Arguments for passage included statements ***t Mr. Hussein was merely sucking up to Eurotrash and ***t he paid off someone to get nominated.

"What the fuck has he done to promote peace?" shouted one emotional Representative. "He doesn't even have a valid birth certificate," cried another.

Voting was delayed until this afternoon, shortly after one member declared, "Upon reflection, he has screwed US over!" and the chamber erupted in tears. House Republicans made a beeline to the restrooms to repair their makeup and blow their noses.


:lol: Link?

There goes Ravi again. Posting immflamable material without proof(link). It means nothing, just a desperate socialist posting nonsense
 
Hmmmm......Taliban AND Conservatives condemning Obama's winning the Nobel!


how can anyone applaud this farce???....the nominations were required to be submitted Feb 1.....hmm.........what did he do in those 12 days ***t warrants this???

do tell:confused:
 
KABUL: A Taliban spokesman in Afghanistan has condemned President Barack Obama's winning of the Nobel Peace Prize, saying the American president had only escalated the war by sending more troops.

Qari Yousef Ahmadi accused Obama ``of having the blood of the Afghan people on his hands.''

Ahmadi said in a telephone interview Friday from an undisclosed location: ``Why are they giving this prize to Obama, who has sent more troops to Afghanistan, who is bombing and killing innocent people?''

Obama ordered 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan earlier this year and is debating a request from his top commanders to send 40,000 more.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/Afghan-Taliban-condemn-Obamas-winning-Nobel-/articleshow/5106879.cms
:eusa_whistle:

Hmmmm......Taliban AND Conservatives condemning Obama's winning the Nobel!
I thought it was pretty funny. :cool:
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.
 
October 9, 2009 - Reacting to the news this morning ***t President Barak Hussein Obama was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace, Republicans on the hill reacted quickly by introducing a resolution calling for a National Day of Shame.

Arguments for passage included statements ***t Mr. Hussein was merely sucking up to Eurotrash and ***t he paid off someone to get nominated.

"What the fuck has he done to promote peace?" shouted one emotional Representative. "He doesn't even have a valid birth certificate," cried another.

Voting was delayed until this afternoon, shortly after one member declared, "Upon reflection, he has screwed US over!" and the chamber erupted in tears. House Republicans made a beeline to the restrooms to repair their makeup and blow their noses.


:lol: Link?

There goes Ravi again. Posting immflamable material without proof(link). It means nothing, just a desperate socialist posting nonsense

Somebodys satire meter is in need of adjustment
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.

Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.

Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Unfortunately, I have a seriously low tolerance threshold for stupidity.

Surely, even latte liberals can work out the appropriate section to post in? Or do I give them too much credit for basic reading and comprehension skills?
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.

Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Uhhhhh...SURE they do. Can you say "WMD"? How about "Strategery"? "We will get enough oil from Iraq to more than pay for this war"? "Mission Accomplished"?

Trust me, the liberals needed NO fabrication. Dubya and DICK gave them all of the headlines they needed.
 
To commemorate this history victory, the Noble Committee awarded Barack Hussein Obama a Golden Kneepad
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.

Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Unfortunately, I have a seriously low tolerance threshold for stupidity.

Surely, even latte liberals can work out the appropriate section to post in? Or do I give them too much credit for basic reading and comprehension skills?

Can't tolerate yourself much, eh?
 
Am I the only person who thinks that "debating" an opening post that is sheer fantasy is a tad ridiculous at best ... at worst, totally fucking stupid.

I'm a newbie so perhaps I'm missing the point but I find myself thinking "WFT kind of political forum is this?" People actually debate based on fantasy? Oh dear, how very sad. It's not like there isn't enough real bullshit around to beat each other up with.

Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Unfortunately, I have a seriously low tolerance threshold for stupidity.
Excellent. Don't read my threads then...or at the very least quit whining about them.

Are you yet another whiner from Hannity?
 
Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Unfortunately, I have a seriously low tolerance threshold for stupidity.

Surely, even latte liberals can work out the appropriate section to post in? Or do I give them too much credit for basic reading and comprehension skills?

Can't tolerate yourself much, eh?

That's a very impressive comeback. Wow! I just soooo did not see that one coming....


Congratulations on actually making my point.
 
Libs often have to fabricate headlines just to attack their opposition.

Unfortunately, I have a seriously low tolerance threshold for stupidity.
Excellent. Don't read my threads then...or at the very least quit whining about them.

Are you yet another whiner from Hannity?

No sweetie, I'm just a reasonably intelligent person who would prefer to debate based on fact - or even reality - rather than some idiotic fantasy.

What flavor?
 

Forum List

Back
Top